Date: 4.10.2017 / Article Rating: 4 / Votes: 7267
Esa.essayninja.life #Does orange juice stain

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Does orange juice stain














My Homework Done | We Can Do Your Assignment - 24/7 Online Help - does orange juice stain - Winthrop University

Nov/Sun/2017 | Uncategorized


Essay Writing Service Australia - Orange Juice Stain Removal Guide - Stain Removal 101 - University of Leeds

Nov 26, 2017 Does orange juice stain,

Best Australian Essays | Best Essay Writing Service in Australia - How to Remove Juice Stains - How To Clean Stuff net - Spelman College

Blues take Brian Elliott off of injured reserve list. The St. Orange Stain. Louis Blues announced that they have activated Brian Elliott (knee) from the the woman, injured reserve list. Does. With Elliott back, he figures to resume his duties as the isabella measure for measure, team#8217;s starting goaltender, but the Blues#8217; goaltending situation is still somewhat unclear. They signed Martin Brodeur during Elliott#8217;s absence, which means they now have three healthy goaltenders on orange their roster. Hill. Brodeur#8217;s starts have been a mixed bag, but he posted a 16-save shutout against the Colorado Avalanche on Monday. Does Orange Juice Stain. He now has a 2.63 GAA and Throughout of American, .904 save percentage in six contests with St. Orange Juice Stain. Louis.

Meanwhile, Jake Allen has surrendered nine goals over his last two starts, giving him a 2.76 GAA and the woman in black, .899 save percentage in 19 games this season. Even if the does orange, Blues now see Brodeur as a preferable option to visual communication serve as Elliott#8217;s backup over Allen, it wouldn#8217;t necessarily settle the issue. Allen, 24, would still need to juice stain be placed on children 17 waivers in order to be sent to does orange the minors and visual communication definition, the Blues would be in danger of losing him given his potential and reasonable $800,000 annual cap hit. The news on stain the injury front wasn#8217;t all good for definition St. Orange Juice Stain. Louis. Measure For Measure. Chris Porter suffered a leg injury during Monday#8217;s contest and has been placed on the injured reserve list. He will be re-evaluated in does orange, six weeks.

Confirmed: Elliott will start tonight for kaizen foam uk #stlblues. Does Orange Stain. Video: Marleau scores in Maple Leafs regular season debut. Patrick Marleau was about to deontological ethics embark on his rookie NHL season when Auston Matthews was born. The year was 1997. Juice Stain. Way back in definition, the day. Orange Juice Stain. . For Measure. . Juice Stain. On Wednesday, they combined to score Toronto#8217;s fourth goal of the night versus Winnipeg, as Matthews set up Marleau off the kaizen foam uk, rush, and the former San Jose Sharks forward finished the orange, play off with a nice move to the backhand on Steve Mason. Marleau turned 38 years old last month at isabella measure the beginning of orange juice training camp, after deciding to sign as a free agent in Toronto following 19 seasons and 1,493 games with San Jose. Ducks sign Josh Manson to measure new four-year deal.

The Anaheim Ducks don#8217;t play Wednesday, but they made news anyway, by does orange announcing that Josh Manson has signed a new four-year contract. Definition. Manson, 25, was in the final year of a two-year contract with an annual average value of orange $825,000 and deontological ethics kant, a pending restricted free agent at orange the end of number this season. This new contract comes with a substantial raise, too, according to juice Eric Stephens of the Orange County Register. Josh Manson#39;s new four-year deal will have an AAV of deontological $4.1 million. Does Orange Juice Stain. Kicks in vodafone, next season. Manson, the does orange stain, son of former NHLer Dave Manson, broke into children 17, the league with the does, Ducks during the 2014-15 season and brings a physical style of play to act section 17 Anaheim#8217;s blue line.

Last season, he recorded a career high in does juice stain, points with 17 in visual, 82 games, while being used in juice, a penalty killing role, as well. Im hoping this year will be another step in kaizen foam uk, that direction,#8221; he told the L.A. Times a few days ago. #8220;I hope I dont fully feel like Ive reached my potential. Stain. Im always going to communication definition keep getting better. Video: Nazem Kadri scores the first goal of the 2017-18 season. On Wednesday, it was his Toronto Maple Leafs teammate Nazem Kadri opening the stain, new season with its first goal, as he skated by cassius the net and does juice stain, flipped a loose puck over act section 17, Steve Mason, who is making his official debut for the Winnipeg Jets. Juice Stain. The Kadri goal came soon after the cassius, Maple Leafs killed off three consecutive Winnipeg power plays early on, which helped the does juice stain, Jets take a sizable lead in children act section 17, shots on does orange stain goal. In Black. That said, they were unable to does orange juice beat Frederik Andersen, who was up to the challenge with some key stops. Toronto opened up a three-goal lead on for measure Winnipeg after the opening period. Does Stain. Talk about the woman a tough start for Mason. Does Orange Juice Stain. Oilers, Golden Knights, Cali teams, and more in PHT#8217;s Pacific preview. Let#8217;s cut to the chase and Essay Throughout, wrap up these division previews.

The Anaheim Ducks didn#8217;t lose Sami Vatanen to the expansion draft, as some feared. Still, Shea Theodoreis a painful loss, even though he highlights the Ducks#8217; riches on defense in does stain, his departure. Cam Fowler had been trade rumor fodder for what felt like ages. The Woman By Susan. The Ducks flipped the does, script, signing him to an eight-year, $52 million extension that remains eye-popping. Isabella Measure For Measure. To some surprise, the stain, Ducks brought backPatrick Eaves, a guy who once seemed like a nice rental. Then again, do you let a beard like that go?

The Ducks will limp, rather than waddle, into deontological, the season because of orange injuries to visual definition the likes of juice Eaves, Ryan Kesler and visual communication definition, Ryan Miller. Juice Stain. (Side note: Kesler#8217;s work ethic deserves a plug.) Looks like Patrick Eaves (lower body) and 17, Ryan Miller (upper body) start season on does orange stain injured reserve. They join Kesler, Lindholm, Vatanen. Essay Throughout The History Of American Society. Goodness, what an orange offseason for the Coyotes. Mark them down as one of the children act section 17, biggest movers, even if it remains to stain be seen if they can make big gains right away. Arizona added a possible first-line center option in Derek Stepan, while they#8217;ll ponder Antti Raanta#8216;s credentials as a potential goalie of the future. Vodafone. Raanta will need to prove it, as they didn#8217;t hand him an extension off the does orange juice, bat, like some teams have done in similar situations. Measure. The Coyotes also shippedConnor Murphy to does juice the Chicago Blackhawks for fantastic defensive defenseman Niklas Hjalmarsson. Isabella. That defense looks deadly after also adding Jason Demers to the mix.

There was a period where parting ways with Dave Tippett, Mike Smith, and Shane Doan seemed like bad PR. That wave of does orange juice moves likely washes that away, and deontological kant, gives new head coach Rick Tocchet something to does stain work with. There#8217;s still work to Essay Struggles Society do, however. The Flames keep clearing their throats at all that praise for orange juice stain the Coyotes. Kant. They made big changes, too. Does. One area that should be intriguing is in visual communication definition, net.

Smith and juice, Eddie Lack replace Brian Elliott and communication, Chad Johnsonas the does juice stain, Flames#8217; goalies. 17. That#8217;s a different duo; will they be better? If nothing else, the does orange juice stain, Flames deserve our collective appreciation for cassius giving Jaromir Jagr a long-overdue contract. Orange Stain. It should be fascinating to deontological ethics see where the legendary winger fits in. Calgary sent assets to stain the New York Islanders for Travis Hamonic, setting the stage for in black hill an outstanding defense alongside Mark Giordano, Dougie Hamilton, and T.J. Orange Stain. Brodie.

Re-signing Michael Stone could also help solidify the caesar, bottom pairing. Whether you agreed with the does orange, moves or not, this was a historic offseason for the Oilers. It all starts with two huge contract extensions: Connor McDavidtaking a bit less than he could and deontological kant, Leon Draisaitl#8216;s $8.5M cap hit causing some consternation. Yes, the Oilers#8217; cap situation could end up being scary. Does Orange. That has as much to do with the makeup of the by susan hill, supporting cast as anything else.

Kris Russell receiving term and a $4M cap hit draws somewhat similar criticism to does orange stain the deal Milan Lucic landed a year earlier. Another polarizing move: shedding Jordan Eberle#8216;s $6M in a trade that landed tough-to-gauge forward Ryan Strome, who#8217;s entering a contract year. Caesar. Could Ryan Nugent-Hopkins eventually join Eberle and Taylor Hall as $6M men traded out of town? As much as the Sharks have been able to keep the does orange, band together, a major era ended this summer. Patrick Marleauis now a member of the visual communication definition, Toronto Maple Leafs. Does Orange Juice Stain. It#8217;s going to be weird. Joe Thornton, however, came back.

The Sharks found a nice compromise by kaizen foam uk giving him generous money, but just for one year. Orange Stain. The world got to see Brent Burns and kaizen foam uk, Jumbo Joe just about naked. Enter if you dare. Also, Burns and orange juice, McDavid made some funny ads. Again, the number, band is staying together. Marc-Edouard Vlasic joins Burns and Martin Jones as aging (but impressive) players locked up long-term in San Jose. Juice Stain. The hope is that regression does not begin anytime soon #8230; but we#8217;ll see. The bad news is that, despite a dismal season, the vodafone sales number, Canucks didn#8217;t get one of the top two picks.

If tanking is the stain, plan, another rough year could be in children act section 17, order. Also not so great: the does orange, possible year-long story about the Sedin twins staying or going. Julius Caesar. Yes, there#8217;s some gloom. Juice. Yet, after a strong trade deadline and the woman by susan, some savvy offseason moves, there#8217;s hope that Vancouver might make some strides in their rebuild. Does Orange. They also might be marginally more pleasant this season. The additions of Sam Gagner, Michael Del Zotto, and Thomas Vanek aren#8217;t likely to make them a good team, but it might make Vancouver easier on the eyes.

Golden Knights GM George McPhee gleefully cornered the kaizen foam uk, trade market heading into juice stain, the expansion draft. Vegas didn#8217;t end up with a ton of immediate returns outside of ethics kant a few nice players (James Neal, Jonathan Marchessault, Reilly Smith, David Perron, Shea Theodore, and Marc-Andre Fleury in particular), but this franchise has a ton of draft picks in 2017 and beyond. Does Juice Stain. They seemed to ethics kant do well in their first draft, too. Independent observers agreed. Really, it#8217;s another post to does stain review the julius, Golden Knights#8217; entire offseason.

Take a peek at the league#8217;s opening night rosters to does get a sense of cassius julius where they stand today, though.

Do My Essay Me Free - How to Remove Juice Stains - How To Clean Stuff net - Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Does orange juice stain

Formatting Your Paper - APA Style Guide - Does orange juice stain your pants? | Yahoo Answers - Mary Baldwin University

Nov 26, 2017 Does orange juice stain,

Nursing Writing Services - Custom nursing papers including essays - Orange Juice Stain Removal Guide - Stain Removal 101 - University of Wisconsin Milwaukee

My Favourite Book In Hindi Essays and Research Papers. (1) I have read a number of books in English and Hindi . Orange Juice Stain? Most of them have been to Essay on Racial Struggles Society, my liking and I have spent . many an hour reading them. But one which has pleased me most is does orange juice stain, Munshi Prem Chands Godaan. Godaan, is Prem Chands master-piece and ranks very high in the world of fiction. Kaizen Foam Uk? The book portrays the does orange stain life of the poor villagers Hari, Dhania and tohers. The author felt the problems of the villagers and placed them before us honestly. Essay Struggles Society? Closely connected with their lives is the picture. Hanuman , Lakshmana , Lanka 1577 Words | 4 Pages. My favourite book . For years, teachers and parents have been worried about comics, the does orange stain cinema, television, . and now the Internet. They all stop children reading, they say. Ethics? However, it now seems that children are reading more than ever. Reading habits have changed, because there is does juice stain, now lots of Essay on Racial Struggles the History Society, competition from other media, but I think that reading is does orange, still popular.

The reading is very important for me because book is cognitive. When I read a book I recognize something interesting, I get. American Civil War , Ashley Wilkes , Clark Gable 936 Words | 3 Pages. Project: My favorite book 2012 . In Black Hill? Recently I`ve read a very interesting book that impressed me greatly. It was the novel by does Vera Kryzhanovskaya Hellish charms.

Russian writer and spiritualist Vera Kryzhanovskaya was the first woman writer of science fiction in the world, and the first professional science fiction writer in Russia. She was born June 2, 1857 .Her Father was from an old noble family. Boy , Female , Girl 890 Words | 3 Pages. ? My Favourite Author A person who has good thoughts cannot ever be ugly. You can have a wonky nose and kaizen foam uk a crooked mouth and does orange juice stain a . double chin and stick-out teeth, but if you have good thoughts, they will shine out of your face like sunbeams and you will always look lovely. -Roald Dahl Roald Dahl has written numerous childrens books in his career as a writer. He had fun playing around with. Charlie and isabella measure for measure the Chocolate Factory , Child , Chocolate 736 Words | 3 Pages. My Favourite Day of the Week I cannot say which day of the week is my favourite day because it is . unknown how a day would end up. But still, school days are never days that I look forward to. School, homework and tuition classes burdens me.

Excluding the schooldays, only does orange juice, Friday or Saturday would be my choice. The day I like the most, is Saturday. Saturday is perfectly placed at the last day of the week. As usual in the morning I would have to children 17, go to does, school for in black hill, co-curriculum activities. Those activities. Chasing Lights , Frankie Sandford , Piano 875 Words | 3 Pages.

9/17/12 Essa on M Favourite Teacher H OME A B OU T SI TE P RESERV E OU R A RTI CLE CONTENT QU A LI T GU I DELI NES DI . SCLA I MER TOS CONTA CT U GUIDELINES About Site Content Qualit Guidelines Terms of Service Privac Polic Disclaimer Cop right Recent Articles Essa on M Favourite Teacher ROHIT AGARWAL De igne Sa ee Online sare e sba aar.com /Sare e s-183.htm l Bu Latest Designer Sarees Online. Does Orange? Free Shipping WorldWide. Order now! O ganic Fa ming www.acre. All rights reserved , Casting , Copyright 595 Words | 4 Pages.

My Favourite Book It's hard to imagine our lives without books . We learn a lot of interesting things . when we read books . Books are our great friend, teachers and 17 advisers. Does Juice? They teach us how to take the next step when we are in a difficult situation. Essay On Racial Struggles Throughout Of American Society? They help to shape our life. It is impossible to become an educated person without books . Besides, books play an does orange juice, important role in upbringing our feelings, views and children act section tastes; give us a lot of useful information. Frankly speaking I'm not a bookworm but. Bella Swan , Edward Cullen , Friendship 856 Words | 2 Pages. Some read books to idle away their time. Some read books to widen their knowledge, while many others read books to . enjoy its content. I belong to juice, this category. I enjoy reading good books particularly novels, short stories, plays, etc. Measure For Measure? The world famous literary works of juice stain, great authors such as, Charles Dickens, Tolstoy, Dominique Lappiere, Rabindranath Tagore, R. K. Narayan, Arundhathi Roy, Salman Rushdie, etc. have always charmed and children act section 17 thrilled me, giving waves of delight, leisure, relaxation and.

Charles Dickens , Fiction , Kolkata 479 Words | 2 Pages. rigged her laptop to announce that it would self-destruct in five seconds. Does Juice Stain? While Donna was on her laptop, he activated the computers announcement. The . computer said five four three two and up the vodafone number stairs she ran screaming HIT THE DECK! HIT THE DECK, MY COMPUTER IS GOING TO BLOW UP!! He told her what he did and she bit him.

Later on, Randi, Donna, and does orange juice stain Mark had decided to make videos. At first he wanted to kaizen foam uk, make up a movie, but then they used Star Wars Trilogy but called it the Star Wars Sill-Ogy. Computer , Dustin Moskovitz , Eduardo Saverin 837 Words | 3 Pages. ? My favourite book Pride and stain prejudice Jane Austen Made by Khodjimukhamedova Dayana 06-12 group I like reading . Children Act Section? very much. Books are the does orange history and Essay on Racial Throughout Society tastes of does stain, each era. Sales Number? Some of them hopelessly lost its charm, others - are relevant and are read with interest today.

Every writer wanted to write for ages, but could he or no; it turns out in does juice, subsequent generations. Sales? I can say that I love all kinds of books . I have a lot of them, they are different, some imaginative, other fantastic. Does Orange? Pride of woman. Bridget Jones , Elizabeth Bennet , Fitzwilliam Darcy 758 Words | 5 Pages. MY FAVOURITE CITY I love Paris with such a passion, it hurts. Last year I lived there for four months but still, I can never . get enough.

When I'm not in Paris I ache for the woman, the city as if for a lost love. If I could return once more, I'd jump feet first into does orange juice stain, all the wonderful places I still want to discover. And, I would also make a personal pilgrimage to my favorite places from chic to charming all that hooked my heart. First I would re visit my favorite arrondissement, the Marais. Here the. 3rd arrondissement of Paris , 4th arrondissement of Paris , Le Marais 1005 Words | 3 Pages. My Favourite Sports I really love going outside and compete outdoor plot of on Racial the History of American, grounds.

Out of the many sports that I wee-wee play . in high school, I like playing basketball the does orange juice near. The reason is because it is challenging and it needs a plentifulness of on Racial Struggles Throughout the History, teamwork to derive a game. It is not subdued to be able to does juice stain, sink a basketball. It takes many days of kaizen foam uk, practice. Juice? I have a good aim and I like to be the someone to throw the ball into kaizen foam uk, the hoop.

I find that playing a basketball game is does orange juice stain, very challenging. Cricket , Cricket terminology , Fielding 1386 Words | 4 Pages. My Favourite City My favourite place is Hyderabad. I like it for its culture, location, good . connectivity with other cities, somewhat moderate climate, the in black hill economy, infrastructure, education, different markets and lots of does orange, other things. For Measure? Its a city where you find all the useful things in one place, its also an IT-BPO hub, the orange juice stain daily goods and kaizen foam uk services are very affordable and of reasonable quality, eateries offering a variety of does juice stain, cuisine also at kaizen foam uk very affordable rates, and to me as a practising Muslim. Andhra Pradesh , Hyderabad State , Hyderabad, India 976 Words | 3 Pages.

?ESSAY: MY FAVOURITE PERSONALITY Every person in this world has a hero. People have heroes because they really . admire that person and they really look up to that person. They want to do what they have done and they have achieved in their life. Like every person, I also have a hero. My hero had a great personality and does stain a great heart. Essay On Racial Throughout The History Of American? His name is does orange stain, Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah. I choose him as my hero because I really admire him. I admire his style, his personality and what he did for. Indian National Congress , Karachi , Lahore 956 Words | 3 Pages. Reading is the act section exercise of does juice, mind mostly done with books . A book is a volume of many sheets of paper bounded together, containing . Isabella? text, illustrations, photographs, or other kind of orange juice, information. I have read many books but the Holy Quran is the most important and sacred book to me.

Thus it is my favorite book . Vodafone Number? The Holy Quran is basically a religious book of does juice, Muslims. It was revealed to the last prophet of Allah, Hazrat Muhammad (SAW). The arch-angel Gabriel brought this scripture in the 7th century. Allah , Hadith , Islam 472 Words | 2 Pages. My Favourite Holiday Destination I have been to several places around the in black by susan hill world, Mumbai and Goa in India, Paris in France, . Hamburg in Germany, Rome and Venice in juice stain, Italy, Vatican City, Singapore, Hong Kong, Melbourne and Sydney in Australia but my personal favourite is the Brisbane-Gold Coast trip which also happens to children 17, be in orange juice stain, Australia.

I liked it very much since Gold Coast had 2 huge theme parks and an amazing water park. It was the 16th of Essay Struggles Throughout of American Society, December we were on orange our way to for measure, Dubai International Airport. Amusement park , Gold Coast, Queensland , Marine biology 2694 Words | 7 Pages. My favourite personality:THE PERSONALITY OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD (S.A.W.W) The Personality Of The Prophet Muhammad The Prophet . Does? Muhammad was known for good character throughout his life. He was known as: The Honest long before he received the message of Islam . He was handsome, of medium height, very active, walked rapidly which forced his companions to the woman in black by susan hill, race to keep up with him. People reported seeing light around his body and in does orange stain, his face, which they compared to the sun or the full moon.

His. Islam , Jesus , Medina 1122 Words | 3 Pages. My Favourite Book Essay noughts and crosses. My Favourite Book Essay (or not!) Books , what would my life be without . books ? BORING. Kaizen Foam Uk? With books you can do anything you put your mind to, be anything, travel anywhere in the world through a book , its amazing how just twenty six letters of the alphabet form to make a beautiful book , the smell of books can tell its own story, many people think that I read because I dont have a life but I read because I choose to orange juice, have many. I have many favourite books , however I dont have one particular favourite. Africa , Black people , Human 592 Words | 2 Pages. give every school student a computer. A computer is going to be given to the every school student by the government. 9. You can buy a magazine on the . train. A Magazinecan be boughton the isabella train.(by you) 10.

My sister made a pop video. Orange? The pop videowas made by sales number my sister. Complete this radio news report using a passive form on the verbs in stain, the brackets ! Good afternon . Deontological Kant? The lunch time news today will be read(read) by John Houard.The prime minister has visited a primary school. Automobile , School , Tabloid 636 Words | 2 Pages. is to provide information about the Physics i.e. electromagnetism, thermodynamics, gravitation.

Concepts made clear through animations and through the study . of reference books . COURSE OUTCOMES At the end of this course students become able to implements the does orange juice physics in ethics, different fields of orange juice, life like engineering etc TEXT BOOKS (S) AND REFERENCES PHYSICS BY HALLIDAY, RESNICK-WALKER PHYSICS BY HALLIDAY, RESNICK-KRANE VOLUME I AND II ASSESSMENT EVALUATION Final Exam 40% Midterm Exam 25% . Electric current , Electromagnetism , Fundamental physics concepts 325 Words | 4 Pages. ( DPLP 1112 ) DIPLOMA OF EDUCATION ISLAMIC STUDIES ( B ) PROGRESSIVE ENGLISH BOOK 1 PREPARED FOR : MISS NATASHA BINTI ARIFFIN . PREPARED BY : NADIA NUR AMIRAH BINTI CHE SEMAN 1053030 PAGE 29 ( TASK 10 ) Choose one of the measure for measure topics below and does orange stain write a journal entry of not less than 100 words on it. 4. THE MOST EMBARRASING MOMENT IN MY LIFE. Act Section 17? PAGE 47, 49 COMPREHENSION A. FIND THE FACTS ANSWERS: DIFFICULTY | DETAILS | MONEY | 1. 2. 3. | CLOTHES | 1. three. Family 606 Words | 7 Pages. Komande amx_cvar sv_restart time - restart top15 (samo smije head admin ovo da korsti) amx_map mapa - changelevel amx_votemap mapa1 mapa2 - . Juice? vote za mapu amx_slap nick dmg - slap igraca amx_slay nick - slay igraca amx_kick nick - kickas igraca amx_banip nick - banujes igraca amx_csay color pises slovima na sredini amx_tsay color lijeva strana amx_psay nick poruka playeru =======gt;gt;gt;gt;gt;gt;gt; immunity (can't be affected by other admins). Map , System administrator 574 Words | 3 Pages.

? CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 DESCRIPTION 3 PRESENT CONDITION 4 HOW TO PROTECT OUR WILD LIFE 5 WHICH ANIMALS ARE GOING TO EXTINCT 6 . CONCLUSION Introduction: Bangladesh is located in the north-eastern part of SouthAsia.Bangladesh lies between 20.34 and 26.36 north latitude and 88.01 and vodafone sales 92.41, east longitudes.The mighty Himalayas is to the north, while the southern frontier is covered to the Bay of does orange stain, Bengal.The expensive Gangetic plains to westBengal of. Bangladesh , Bird , Dinosaur 1018 Words | 4 Pages. Section 1: Reserves and Potential for Generation ENERGY STATISTICS 2010 Table 1.1 :Statewise Estimated Reserves of Coal in India as on kaizen foam uk 31.03.2008 and . Orange Stain? 31.03.2009 (In billion tonnes) Proved States/ UTs Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chhattisgarh Jharkhand Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Meghalaya Nagaland Orissa Sikkim Uttar Pradesh West Bengal All India Total Distribution (% ) 31.03.2008 31.03.2009 Indicated 31.03.2008 31.03.2009 Inferred 31.03.2008 31.03.2009 Total 31. Assam , Chhattisgarh , India 1292 Words | 7 Pages. Mirza Professor Marsh ENG 1104 38 25 Feb. 2013 My favorite Poet Throughout the . Kaizen Foam Uk? twenty one years of my life.

I have had the privilege of knowing about many poets and dramatists. However, there is stain, one particular poet whose name is etched in my memory. Ethics? Whenever somebody asks about my favorite poet, his name will automatically flash into my mind. He is Michael Madhusudan Dutt, was a popular 19th century Bengali poet, dramatist and the first sonnet. Bengal , Bengali literature , Bengali poetry 831 Words | 3 Pages. Name of the Candidate Name Surname Name of the Parent / Guardian Date of Birth (dd-mm-yyyy) Socio-Economic Details : Gender Nationality Marital Status Social . Status Male Indian Married SC TELUGU Telugu (For office use only) ID No. ENGLISH Hindi Sanskrit Candidates Latest Photo Female Others Un Married ST BC Rural PH Urban Others If any Specify : Area which you are living comes under whether Are you employed Yes No Please furnish Work Experience (if any) : Organisation Govt. Orange Juice? Private. Distance education , Education , Employment 417 Words | 2 Pages. Bollywood ( Hindi : #2348;#2377;#2354;#2368;#2357;#2369;#2337;, Urdu: ECa#1740; ??) is the deontological ethics informal name given to the popular . Mumbai-based Hindi -language film industry in India (Bharat). The term is often incorrectly used to refer to the whole of Hindi cinema.

Bollywood is only a part of the Bhartiya film industry. The name is a portmanteau of does orange juice stain, Bombay (the former name for act section, Mumbai) and Hollywood, the orange juice center of the American film industry. Though some deplore the name, arguing that it makes the. Asha Bhosle , Bollywood , Cinema of deontological kant, India 1014 Words | 3 Pages. added a new photo to the album Folios. Dad . Does Stain? . Kaizen Foam Uk? . .1 day i will make u proud . Does Orange Stain? ?No Officer I'm Not Drunk, I'm Just Trying To Walk Like Captain Jack Sparrow . I love my DAD shared a link. I guess in this case it'. Asna Aysha likes her own photo. Vishnu Patteri and the woman hill Navas Hashim are now friends.

My life My Choices My Mistakes My lessons not Your Business added a new photo. Does Juice Stain? Dad . . . .1 day i will make u proud . ?@ [111757958898679:? If it is isabella, a never ending Pain fOr me just tO get u ?] Ansab. Indian actors , Indian film actors , International Friendship Day 465 Words | 4 Pages. I read the first 2 books in the Harry Potter series around ten years ago, when we first moved to the UK. I hardly remember anything about . them, but of course, I know all about Harry. He's become such an orange, iconic character in children's fiction and kaizen foam uk is the does orange juice darling of so many kids who grew up with him and the woman hill who are now all young adults themselves. I've always been a bit bemused by Harry Potter's success and does juice stain I'll admit, it really put me off reading the rest of the books . When something gets that. Harry Potter , Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire , Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone 800 Words | 3 Pages.

used today, and they invented numerous astronomical instruments that could compute the positions of the stars. They built the first large observatory . Deontological Kant? research institutes, mainly for the purpose of does juice stain, producing Zij star catalogues.[19] Among these, the Book of Fixed Stars (964) was written by the woman by susan hill the Persian astronomer Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi, who observed a number of stars, star clusters (including the does orange juice Omicron Velorum and Brocchi's Clusters) and galaxies (including the the woman in black by susan Andromeda Galaxy).[20] According to juice stain, A. Alpha Centauri , Binary star , Main sequence 2252 Words | 6 Pages. My Ambition In Life Essay To Become A C. My ambition in life essay to become a collector Free Essays on My Ambition In Life To Become A Collector for students. Use our . papers to help you with yours. My Ambition Become a Collector: exaggeration of on Racial Struggles Throughout Society, your dream and orange juice stain thoughts of how you want to be in your life. My ambition is to become an IAS officer.

Though I. Kaizen Foam Uk? My ambition in does orange juice, life is to kaizen foam uk, become a teacher. There are a number of reasons for my choice. First, about 35 per cent of the people in India are illiterate. They are. Plan essay thirsha Websites. Essay , Writing 1073 Words | 4 Pages.

Book Report of Language in My Thought and My Action and Action by S.I. Hayakawa and Alan R. Juice? Hayakawa book report Language in kaizen foam uk, my Thought and my Action Since I was . born, I have been learning languages consciously and unconsciously without asking why. Juice? S.I. Hayakawa and deontological ethics kant Alan R. Hayakawas Language in Thought and Action remind me the goal of the study of language to learn to think more clearly, to speak and to write more effectively, and to does, listen and to read with greater understanding. This book is divided into 2 parts, the act section functions of does juice, language. Barack Obama , Cognition , Language 2039 Words | 6 Pages. Book Review of Hear My Testimony By Maria Teresa Tula This is probably one of the most moving books I have . Number? ever read in my life. It is basically a narrative story of the does stain life of an El Salvadorian women named: Maria Teresa Tula. Maria is a wonderful storyteller and children 17 the fact the does juice she is describing her own real life experiences greatly add to the impact of the book . In Black Hill? Most of the chapters in orange juice, the book are just her telling about isabella measure her life. She was born a very poor and sickly child, growing up. Abuse , Costa Rica , El Salvador 1222 Words | 4 Pages.

the summer of orange juice stain, 2002, I was curious about children 17 Cathi Hanauer's 1996 novel My Sister's Bones, so I picked it up at a Border's book store. . I'm a sucker for books about eating disorders, although I'm starting to outgrow that particular interest. I was thinking this book might be interesting because it promised a story about a person with an eating disorder told from juice stain a different point of view other than the Essay Throughout of American afflicted. In Hanauer's book , readers do get a novel that is orange juice, marginally about anorexia nervosa, but. Amenorrhoea , Anorexia nervosa , Body dysmorphic disorder 1019 Words | 3 Pages. Essay On My School Picnic For Class 1. Essay on my school picnic for class 1 Contributed By: Rose Johnson, class 7, Carmel School Kuwait. Rose. My father always likes . to speak about measure his childhood, especially when he scolds me. Does Stain? Posted: September 2, 2014 in childrens writing ideas, Essays for Class 1- Class4, Kids essays, Less than 15 sentence essays, Once our school picnic was to a zoo.

Completed application form, High School a picnic at seaside essay 9 class Transcript, Essay: Share a. Kaizen Foam Uk? Sep 25, 2011 - I am writing a profile essay on a. Educational years , Essay , Fifth grade 1239 Words | 4 Pages. Book Critique a Piece of My Heart. The book A Piece of my Heart by Keith Walker is a compilation of twenty-six stories told by the Women who served in Vietnam. . Each woman has their own story and memories that they tell to give the reader an appreciation for all of the women that served alongside the men. Does? These women all show us the the woman in black by susan reasoning behind why they served, their experiences in Vietnam, and their life following the war. Whether these women were nurses, activity planners, or doughnut dollies (women who were reminders. Cold War , Communism , John F. Kennedy 896 Words | 3 Pages. Essay on an Unforgettable Day of My Life in Hindi.

gautam nagar.p.o , Civil lines, Moradabad - 244001 (U.P.) Mobile No. +91-8899161283 E-Mail Address- dheerushrivastav@rediffmaill.com Career Objective: . Seeking a dynamic position in business developing in stain, order to increase my knowledge and further develop my skills in the field. Study till date ? MBA (Finance Marketing) from Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute Of Technology Science, Dehradun, affiliated to ethics kant, Uttrakhand Technical University. Academic Qualification: B.com from does M. Amitabh Bachchan , Business school , Leadership 257 Words | 3 Pages. facts about the most used and for measure abused drugs to the reader. The author tried to do this in a way that was very understandable to any appropriate reader that . picked up the book . Ultimately Buzzed was made to give people the ability to stain, make informed decisions on the woman in black by susan hill drug use. Each individual drug or class of does orange stain, drugs mentioned in the book came with common main points. Children Act Section? First the history of drug back to its earliest known use would be given to the reader.

Then, Kuhn would discuss how the drug or drugs move. Academy Award for Best Actress , Drug , Drug addiction 1156 Words | 3 Pages. to the printed directions supplied with each ball.14 Lindley LJ goes on to state We must first consider whether this was intended to be a promise at all, . or whether it was a mere puff which meant nothing. Was it mere puff? My answer to that question is No, and I base my answer upon this passage: 1000?. Is deposited with the alliance Bank, shewing our sincerity in the matter,The deposit is orange stain, called in aid by the advertised as proof of his sincerity in the matter, - that is, the sincerity of his. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company , Contract , Contract law 2673 Words | 7 Pages. Hindi Nationalism This piece on Hindu nationalism, written by Alok Rai, deals with the coming of for measure, modern Hindi in does orange juice, the late 90s . and the early 20s.

Alok Rai who is also known as a critical thinker, theorist and also the Society grandson of Premchand makes his readers aware of the does orange juice stain process of modernization in deontological kant, the case of language. In this essay we get to witness a connection between Hindi (old Hindi ) and Hindi (new Hindi ). Does Orange Juice? Making of Hindi as a modern language connects to the woman by susan, the programme of the imagining the. Braj Bhasha , Hindi , Hindi languages 1413 Words | 4 Pages. James Loewen wrote the book Lies My Teacher Told ME to help the orange juice students of the United States become aware of their true . history. This book attempts to show how and why American history has been taught the ethics kant way it has without regard for the truth. Mr. Does Stain? Loewen had compared twelve different history textbooks they are: The Great Republic, The American Way, Land of Promise, Rise of the American Nation, Challenge of Freedom, American Adventures, Discovering American History, The American Tradition, Life. Americas , Black people , Christopher Columbus 1442 Words | 4 Pages. of veterans for their role in a hated war.

However, few are aware of the female role in the Vietnam War; women, the other veterans, shared in isabella, all of these . Does? problems and issues along with the gun-toting men. They were the nurses, and in on Racial Throughout Society, A Piece of My Heart by Keith Walker the orange juice stain stories of many women are presented to vodafone, better understand just how the Vietnam War affected women. Working in places like evacuation hospitals exposed women to the endless flow of casualties from the stain battlefield, and these. Army of the Republic of Vietnam , Cambodia , Hanoi 1639 Words | 4 Pages. My Favourite Book or the Book I Like Most. I can unhesitatingly and boastfully claim that my never- failing friends are they, with whom I converse day by day. And these friends, with . Deontological Ethics? whom I talk, converse and gossip as a matter of routine, are the orange juice BOOKS , that are stacked in kaizen foam uk, our family-library.

Their sweet, long company has made me a true book -lover in the real sense. Without any doubt or reservation, I can frankly say that blessed are those, who are in constant company of books . Books never desert us, when we fall prey to evil days. Catch-22 , Character , Ernest Hemingway 585 Words | 2 Pages. Book Analysis on does orange juice Undercover By Beth Kephart In Partial Fulfilment In English 102 Study and kaizen foam uk Thinking Skills . Does Orange? Submitted to: Sir Mon Cholo A. Cabanig Submitted by: Hime Chu I. Introduction Undercover, a novel written by 17 Beth Kephart. Like a modern-day Cyrano de Bergerac, Elisa ghost-writes love notes for the boys in her school.

But when Elisa falls for Theo Moses, things change fast. Theo asks for verses to juice stain, court the lovely Lila--a girl known. Antagonist , Beth Kephart , Character 1077 Words | 5 Pages. SCC Maharashtra Board Exam Time Table March 2013. SSC Time Table 2013:- Date: 2 March 2013 (Saturday) Paper: First Language . (Marathi/ Hindi /Urdu/Gujarati/Kannada/Tamil/Telgu/Malayalam/Sindhi/ Bengali/Punjabi) Time: 11.00 am to 2.00 pm Date: 5 March 2013 (Tuesday) Paper: Second Language ( Hindi / Hindi Composite) Time: 11.00 am to 2.00 pm Paper: Hindi Composite Time: 11.00 am to 1.00 pm Date: 7 March 2013 (Thursday) Paper: English (First Language / Third Language) Time: 11.00 am to. Cricket , Foreign language , Language 2183 Words | 8 Pages. January 5th 2012 ELA-10-1 TKAMB Essay My Favourite Character This Essay is Essay on Racial Struggles the History of American, about my . favourite character in To Kill a Mocking Bird. She is does orange, one of the deontological biggest, most important characters; she is considered the stain main character.

She is very important for she helps narrate this story. Children Act Section? She helps with the story by describing her thoughts and feelings that is one of the main reasons why I like her. She also helps to develop the plot, themes, and helps to emphasize some of the does symbolism. 17? Her name. African American , American Civil War , Black people 373 Words | 2 Pages. American Novels for orange juice, Research Project English 11H Historical/War Red Badge of Struggles of American, Courage, Stephen Crane Killer Angels, Michael Shaara A Farewell to . Arms, Ernest Hemingway The Things They Carried, Tim OBrien Cold Mountain, Charles Frazier My Brother Sam is Dead, JL Collier African-American Beloved, Toni Morrison (mature themes) I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, Maya Angelou Native Son, James Baldwin The Color Purple, Alice Walker (mature themes) Invisible Man, Ralph Ellison. American novelists , American short story writers , Ernest Hemingway 494 Words | 2 Pages. Book Report on Charles Spurgeon's Lectures to My Students. Charles Spurgeon Book Report Lectures to does juice, my Students Submitted to: Dr. R. Scott Pace Pastoral Leadership 635 By: Johnny . Measure For Measure? F. Does Orange Stain? Gail (ID# L24543560) Lynchburg, Virginia 07 April 2013 Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Summary .1 Critique ...3 Evaluation ...5 Bibliography ..7 Summary Lectures to act section 17, my Students, by C. Does Orange? H.

Charles Spurgeon 876 Words | 3 Pages. think about my favorite things. Isabella? For instance my favorite color is green. I think what it would be like to juice, have everything that . color must get boring to after a while of always seeing that color right well my sisters room is all pink and she still buys a lot of other oink stuff. My favorite kind of kaizen foam uk, shoe is the high heel. I know what you might think at seeing me I am soooo tall I should not want to be taller but I like how it makes me look. Long legs, great calves and does juice stain awesome posture.

My favorite. Aurora , Disney Princess , Disney Princess Enchanted Tales: Follow Your Dreams 608 Words | 2 Pages. ? My Favourite Subject at measure School I must say that I study at an ordinary secondary school in orange juice stain, a small town in Vitebsk region. Isabella For Measure? . Does Orange? It's common knowledge that we study many different subjects at vodafone school. Well, I can't say that I like all of them or that I'm really good at all of them. In fact it's much more pleasant for me to does stain, speak about the subjects I like best. My favourite subjects are humanities, English in particular. Ethics? I began to does stain, study English on a regular school basis when I was in.

England , English language , Foreign language 483 Words | 3 Pages. My name is Andreas1) but I like to be called Andi I'm 34 years old I wrote a DokuWiki extension to make sure the Essay on Racial Throughout the History of American previous fact is . always correct I've been born and live in Berlin, Germany I studied applied computer science I work as a system administrator/ programmer I drink a lot of coffee I don't like sports I prefer T-Shirts and hate suits My first computer was my father's 286 CPU; 40MB HDD; 4 MB I'm only does orange stain, good at things I enjoy (or maybe the other way round) . Curry , Handedness , Left-handedness 751 Words | 5 Pages. Ekushey Book Fair 2012: Celebrating Books Every year when you visit the Bangla Academy area during the first few days of . February, the place takes on isabella measure a festive air with throngs of orange juice, people making their way to the annual Ekushey Book Fair. The entire place is lined with book stalls displaying books from every major publisher in the country, catering to the tastes of absolutely every reader. Kaizen Foam Uk? As you walk in, you are greeted by street artists offering to paint a little something on juice stain your face or hands. A Great Way to Care , Bengali language , Book 928 Words | 3 Pages. the nations attention should be invited to measure, Sardar Patels concrete and constructive contribution in various areas of does orange, Indian polity and vodafone number administration. . Sardar Patelji, the first Home Minister of free India, was a remarkable personality and he is my favourite leader for his innumerable qualities.

There is orange, no one in modern India who has achieved so much in children act section, so many directions and in such a short time as Sardar Patel. At the time of his death, the Manchester Guardian wrote that without Patel, Gandhijis. Gujarat , History of does, India , India 918 Words | 3 Pages. Listening Music * Reading books or Newspaper * Making Friends ------------------------------------------------- PROJECT UNDERTAKEN . Project Name : Business Solution Back End : SQL Server 2008 R2 Front End : Asp.net,C# Operating System : Window 7 ------------------------------------------------- PERSONAL DETAILS Date of Birth : 05/01/1991 Address : Vill+Post-Sandhan,Dist-Meerut(U.P.) ,250401 Language known : Hindi amp; English Gender . Microsoft , Microsoft SQL Server , Microsoft Windows 277 Words | 3 Pages. Book Critique of Charles Spurgeon Lectures to My Students. Liberty University liberty Baptist theological seminary Book CRITIQUE OF: Lectures to my students BY: Charles H. Spurgeon . Submitted to Dr.

Robert Pace in partial fulfillment of the children requirements for does, 201320 SPRING 2013PLED 635 D01 LUO PASTORAL THEOLOGY by: yossi sarid ID# 24901465 las cruces, new mexico APRIL 7, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS BIBLIOGRAPHIC ENTRY1 SUMMARY... 1 critique. Arthur Tappan Pierson , Baptist , Charles Spurgeon 859 Words | 3 Pages. ? My Favourite Hobby My favourite hobby is kaizen foam uk, all kinds of technology like cars, trains, planes . Orange Juice? etc. Sales Number? Mostly it's cars. Everything begun when I was small. My father was repairing his car and I was always helping him. Juice? I was asking him so many questions about it, because I was so interested in techniques. I even started making my own lamps and it worked! All of my family was using it.

List 1: What kinds? 2:How did it begun and vodafone sales number who introduced me to does juice stain, it? 3: Lamps. 4: Why do. Automobile , Family , Future 612 Words | 3 Pages. Book Review: Lies My Teacher Told Me. Book Review: Lies My Teacher Told Me A fascinating and informative book , Lies My Teacher Told Me . by James W. Loewen, takes a look at twelve popular American history textbooks and concludes that the information is false, viewed primarily from an isabella measure for measure, European perspective, and made up to credit national myths. In addition, James Loewen presents many key historical events that he feels are missing from many of these textbooks and should be included. Published in 1995 by The New Press, Lies My Teacher. American Civil War , Historiography , Historiography of early Islam 1251 Words | 4 Pages. Dictionaries qft C6Tm Compiled by.

Iq) S.No. Name of Dictionary . Orange Stain? Ri. 1. A Practical Hindi -English Mahendra Dictionary Chaturvedi Dr. Bholanath Tiwari National Publishing Rs.175.00 House, 23, Darya Ganj New Delhi -110002 (India) Rajpal Sons Kashmere Gate Delhi-ll0006 (India) Vani Prakashan 21-A, Darya Ganj New Delhi-ll0002 (India) Rs.150.00 2. Learners' Hindi -English Dictionary . Delhi , Dictionary , India 302 Words | 3 Pages. Book Reflection : The Book Of Negroes It's 1802 and Aminata Diallo, now an old woman, sits down to write her life story at Essay Throughout the History Society the . request of the Abolitionists in London.

Abducted from her village in West Africa at the age of eleven and marched in a coffle (a string of slaves) for three months before reaching the coast, Aminata survives the voyage to America and ends up sold to an indigo plantation owner in South Carolina. She describes herself as lucky, because compared to orange juice stain, the tragic circumstances. Africa , African American , Black people 1594 Words | 5 Pages. Science writing in deontological ethics kant, Hindi appears to have began in 1818 (Patariya, 2000) with the publication of a magazine named Hindi . Juice Stain? Digdarshan, copies of which were circulated to many schools in West Bengal. Essay Struggles The History? Digdarshan' regularly incorporated materials on does science, a trend that was not in vogue at that time even in contemporary reputed Hindi publication 'Udant martand' (1928) credited to vodafone, be the orange stain first Hindi newspaper. Patairiya (2000) further narrates that a questionnaire related to chemistry way.

Delhi , Hindi , Popular science 1626 Words | 5 Pages.

Buy Narrative Essay - How to Remove Orange Juice Stains on Clothes | Cleanipedia - Brenau University

Nov 26, 2017 Does orange juice stain,

Write My Paper In Hours - How to Remove Juice Stains - How To Clean Stuff net - Virginia Union University

8 Simple Business Plan Templates for Entrepreneurs. Writing a business plan is an important step in the startup process. It helps you and your partners decide if you will work well together, teaches you about the does orange, marketplace, and lets you brainstorm business and product goals. But because of all the effort and kaizen foam uk, detail involved, many entrepreneurs dread the thought of does orange stain sitting down and creating this critical but time-consuming document. While business plans can be frustrating if you#39;re writing one from vodafone sales number scratch, there are plenty of online templates available to take some of the does juice, pain out of the process. Vodafone Sales? Small business owners can benefit from simple, easy-to-follow business-plan tools so they can spend less time writing and stain, more time launching. Here are eight resources you can use to help you craft a professional business plan quickly and easily. You#39;ve heard about those entrepreneurs who started off by jotting down their ideas on Essay Struggles Throughout the History of American Society, a napkin at a bar, café or restaurant. $100 Startup#39;s One-Page Business Plan is juice a little like that, but more organized. Designed for entrepreneurs who are itching to kaizen foam uk get started, this simple business-plan template asks a handful of questions that you can easily answer in one or two sentences.

It covers everything from what you sell and who will buy it to how you will get paid, hustle to find customers, foresee challenges and overcome the obstacles all in does orange juice stain, a single page. [Writing a Business Plan? Do These 5 Things First] Not all small businesses are concerned with credit lines, partnerships and office space at kaizen foam uk, least not in orange juice, the beginning. So why should their initial business plans include these things? Copyblogger#39;s Remarkably Simple Business Plan doesn#39;t. The Woman By Susan Hill? Instead, it offers a business-plan template fit for the real would-be entrepreneur#39;s world. Whereas most business-plan templates assume all businesses are uniform, Copyblogger#39;s Remarkably Simple Business Plan was created to get to what entrepreneurs really need to orange stain know to start a business: the sales number, ins and outs of the product or service, how customers will find the business and how the does orange, business will make money. Simply copy and paste the number, template of the Remarkably Simple Business Plan, created by Sonia Simone, co-founder and does orange, chief content officer of Copyblogger Media, and you#39;re good to go. Founded in 2011, Enloop is regarded as an innovative player in the business-plan-creation industry. Like many others, the service uses an online interface to help automate your business plan#39;s creation. To get started, users enter basic information about their businesses, including product details. Then, Enloop#39;s software uses metrics to help predict the financial performance of the company in comparison with others in the sector.

According to CEO Cynthia McCahon, the goal of the company is to help entrepreneurs make better-informed decisions. Users can get started on Enloop for free; more advanced paid options are also available. LivePlan is a relatively new entrant to kaizen foam uk the online business-tools market that helps you every step of the way, from the planning stages through your launch. Like other services, LivePlan allows business owners to craft perfectly formatted plans. From there, users can create the presentation necessary to pitch their business ideas to would-be investors. Once off the ground, businesses can track revenue and does, expenses against forecasts, and multiple users within a company can work through the LivePlan interface. Pricing starts at less than $12 a month. The One Page Business Plan Company. Created by The One Page Business Plan Company, this simple business template covers only the Essay Throughout, key areas entrepreneurs need to address to start a business: their vision for does juice stain, the company, mission for isabella, why the juice stain, business exists, objectives for number, setting out goals, strategies to does orange juice make the business successful and action plans indicating what work needs to be done.

Unlike complicated business plans, boring blocks of text are not required bullet points will do. Are you the visual type? Look no further than Angela Bowman#39;s One-Page Visual Business Plan. Based on the principles of the Business Generation Model Strategyzer app, Bowman#39;s One-Page Visual Business Plan uses sticky notes to help you creatively craft an out-of-the-box business plan. To create a One-Page Visual Business Plan, start by separating a single page into different sections or columns, such as company information and deontological kant, customer segments. Write down your ideas or responses on a sticky note, and then stick it on does orange, the corresponding section. You can also color-code the sticky notes for better organization.

Then, if your plans change, you can easily remove a note, move it around or add new ones to better fit the direction in which your business is headed. SBA Build Your Business Plan Tool. The fact that the kaizen foam uk, U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) has an online tool to help users craft business plans will come as no surprise to anyone who has investigated the SBA#39;s offerings before. The agency has a wealth of free planning, financing and juice stain, consulting tools and resources, both online and through available consultants. The SBA#39;s online tool for business-plan creation allows a user to enter information on a Web interface that is tied to that user#39;s account.

The administration says this is intended to be a live plan that can be referred to and changed as the company#39;s plans progress. The SBA encourages entrepreneurs to use their generated plans to for measure discuss their company#39;s prospects with SBA advisers like those available through SCORE and the Small Business Development Center. The SBA#39;s tool is available online at no cost. Greg Go, co-founder of online finance community Wise Bread, is a big believer that entrepreneurs who are just starting out don#39;t need lengthy business plans. What they actually need, he said, is an juice internal working plan to get started.

The internal working plan consists of vodafone sales number four simple questions that make up the orange juice stain, simple business plan: What is your product or service? Who are your customers? When will things get done? When are bills due, and when do you get paid? To guide entrepreneurs in completing their four-question business plan, Go provides a simplified way of answering each question in act section 17, his blog post on the subject. Does Orange Stain? Editor#39;s note: If you#39;re looking for for measure, information to help you with writing a complete business plan, use the questionnaire below to have our sister site provide you with information from orange juice a variety of measure vendors for free. Updated on May 1, 2015.

Additional reporting by Business News Daily staff writer Sara Angeles.

How to Write a Persuasive Essay (with Free Sample Essay) - How to Remove Juice Stains - How To Clean Stuff net - Marywood University

Nov 26, 2017 Does orange juice stain,

Pay for Exclusive Essay - Does orange juice stain your pants? | Yahoo Answers - University of California (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA

dessay height Drunk Driving is a serious offense. Juice Stain! Dui Assistant can help you find a true Driving While Intoxicated lawyer or DUI law Firm to protect your legal rights and defend you from a Drunk Driving related Charge. A Drunk Driving Conviction can lead to loss of employment, substantial civil penalties, fines, jail time, probation, forced rehabilitation, loss of isabella, your vehicle, loss if income, loss of orange juice stain, insurance and other serious consequences. Massachusetts DUI and Massachusetts OUI Violations Here is the Law.

Massachusetts DUI Laws. It is illegal to drive or operate a motor vehicle in Massachusetts, if you are under the influence of kaizen foam uk, alcohol or drugs. According to Massachusetts DUI law, a person is considered too impaired to operate a vehicle if his blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is .08% or greater. If a driver is under the orange juice, age of 21, he or she is prohibited from driving if his or her BAC is higher than .02%. Any driver in Boston or throughout the act section 17, state of does orange, Massachusetts found driving with a BAC at in black, or above the legal limit will be arrested and booked on DUI charges. At this time, its best to contact a seasoned Boston DUI lawyer who has the experience and orange stain skill to defend you in court. Judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement authorities have no tolerance for people who drive under the influence, and always prosecute those people in court. There are defenses to a Massachusetts DUI and Massachusetts OUI Offense: For example, improper administration of roadside tests, mistakes in the arresting officers subjective conclusions regarding your coordination and stability, and on Racial Struggles the History of American the inaccuracy of breathalyzer machines. Field sobriety tests, for example, are not reliable indicators of intoxication. Especially when asked to perform them at night, on orange, the shoulder of the road, in the cold, in hill, the glaring squad car headlights.

We have had success in getting charges dismissed or reduced, or obtaining not guilty verdicts at trial, representing professionals, college students, underage drivers and does orange juice every type of client. Massachusetts encourages first time offenders with no criminal record to plead out in a diversion program. The case is dismissed after mandatory alcohol education classes and one year of probation and, and you can get a hardship drivers license within four days of the plea hearing. A second DUI is harsher, and often requires going to trial. The Woman Hill! A second offense is punished by a minimum of two weeks in an alcohol facility and does a 60-day suspended sentence, two-year license revocation with no hardship license for six months. A third DUI is punished with no less than 150 days of ethics, mandatory jail time, eight year license revocation, with no hardship license considered for two years. Massachusetts OUI/DUI Law First Offense Penalty.

Jail: Not more than 2 1/2 years House of Correction. License suspended for 1 year; work/education hardship considered in 3 months; general hardship in 6 months. Alternative Disposition (1st Offense OUI) Plead to Continuance without a Finding aka CWOF. It is similar to, but not technically a guilty plea. (More info on a CWOF.) Pay a number of fines and orange court fees (over $2500 in total), as well as take a hit to your insurance. Unsupervised probation for one year. Mandatory participation in 16 week (1 hour) alcohol-drug education (DAE) program paid for by defendant. License suspended for 45 to 90 days (not including any penalty for children act section 17 breath test refusal) License suspension is 210 days for drivers under age 21. You are eligible for a hardship license right away, in most cases. The Real Deal on First Offense OUI Penalties:

The minimum penalty (above) is almost always available for a first offense DUI/OUI plea, if your lawyer has OUI defense experience and knows what to ask for, and as long as there is juice stain, no accident, injury, or other extenuating circumstances. In addition, a smart attorney will include all other charges in the plea deal, including civil speeding ticket/moving violations as part of the same penalty, saving you fines and 17 insurance increases. Massachusetts OUI Law Second Offense Penalty. Jail: Not less than 60 days (30 day mandatory), not more then 2 1/2 years. License suspended for orange juice 2 years, work/education hardship considered in 1 year; general hardship in 17, 18 months. Does Orange Stain! (Note: In almost every case, with a breath test refusal or failure you wont be eligible for a hardship or full license restoration for at least 3 years total.) As of January 1, 2006 Interlock device installed in your car at kaizen foam uk, your own expense for 2 years, when you become eligible for hardship or license reinstatement.

Alternative Disposition (2nd Offense OUI) 2 years probation. 14 day confined (inpatient) alcohol treatment program paid for orange juice stain by the sales number, defendant. License suspended for orange juice two years, work/education hardship considered in 1 year; general hardship in 18 months. As of January 1, 2006 Interlock device installed in your car at your own expense for 2 years as a condition of vodafone number, any license reinstatement (including hardship license). If your prior offense is over orange, 10 years ago, you may be eligible for a 24D disposition, which would only kaizen foam uk be the penalties of a first offense. The Registry, however, would still treat you as a 2nd offender for license reinstatement. The Real Deal on 2nd Offense OUI Penalties: See my second offense OUI penalties page for does juice detail on the implications of vodafone, a 2nd offense drunk driving defense.

I can almost always negotiate for the Alternative Disposition above for any second offense OUI conviction, but it is still a tough punishment to accept for many people. Given that there isnt that much risk of a worse outcome if you choose to orange stain fight the case in court, most people choose to take a chance at no penalty, even on a weak case. Remember, even if the prior is in isabella for measure, another state, or decades old, you will be forced to get an interlock device installed in your car as a condition of license reinstatement. The Registry is juice, harsh on this point, and kaizen foam uk there is nothing any lawyer can do about does, it. If you are facing a 2nd offense DUI, this in itself is a good reason to strongly consider fighting the case. Massachusetts OUI/DWI Law Third Offense Penalty(3rd) Penalty. Jail: Not less than 180 days (150 day mandatory), not more than 5 years State Prison (felony status) May be served in measure for measure, a prison treatment program. License suspended for 8 years, work/education hardship considered in 2 years; general hardship in 4 years. Commonwealth may seize, keep, and/or sell your vehicle. The Real Deal on 3rd Offense OUI Penalties:

For any third offense OUI conviction, you are facing a mandatory 5-6 months in jail if found guilty. For a 3rd offense charge, this is a good reason to fight the does orange stain, case and look for a chance to win and avoid jail time. It usually only makes sense to work out a deal if jail time is off the by susan, table, which only happens if the court cant provide sufficient proof of the prior offenses (This can happen if prior DUI convictions are are old, or out of state.) More on third offense DUI charge strategies. MASSACHUSETTS OUI LAW FOURTH OFFENSE (4th) Penalties. Jail: Not less than 2 years (1 year minimum mandatory), not more than 5 years in State Prison (4th Offense OUI is does orange, a Felony Offense) License suspended for 10 years, work/education hardship considered in 5 years; general hardship in 8 years. Commonwealth may seize, keep, and/or sell your vehicle.

The Real Deal on 4th Offense OUI Penalties: Everything about a 3rd offense applies to deontological ethics kant a 4th, 5th or subsequent drunk driving charge. Orange! Even a small chance of winning the isabella for measure, case is worth the does orange juice stain, risk, since it is probably your only chance to avoid jail time. You need to consider fighting your case at trial in almost all cases. MASSACHUSETTS OUI/DUI LAWS FIFTH OFFENSE (5th) Penalty. Jail: Not less than 2 1/2 years (24 mos. minimum mandatory), not more than 5 years (felony status) License Revoked/Suspended for life, no possibility of a hardship license. If convicted on a sixth or subsequent OUI offense, the punishment and mandatory jail time you are risking if found guilty will even longer. Call me for kaizen foam uk details.

OUI With Serious Bodily Injury Penalties. If you are charged with an OUI where someone is injured, you are almost certain to do jail time. The cases become extremely complicated and you need the advice of a DUI OUI lawyer. You can face penalties of 6 months to 2.5 years in jail or 6 months to 10 years in State Prison depending on how your DUI or OUI violation is does orange juice stain, charged and prosecuted. Here is the woman in black hill, a copy of the Massachusetts DUI and OUI Laws. Section 24. (1) (a) (1) Whoever, upon any way or in any place to does stain which the public has a right of access, or upon any way or in any place to which members of the sales number, public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle with a percentage, by weight, of alcohol in their blood of eight one-hundredths or greater, or while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, or of marijuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances, all as defined in orange stain, section one of chapter ninety-four C, or the the woman in black hill, vapors of glue shall be punished by a fine of does orange juice stain, not less than five hundred nor more than five thousand dollars or by children 17, imprisonment for not more than two and one-half years, or both such fine and juice stain imprisonment.

There shall be an assessment of Essay on Racial Throughout the History Society, $250 against a person who is convicted of, is placed on probation for, or is granted a continuance without a finding for or otherwise pleads guilty to does juice or admits to a finding of sufficient facts of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, marijuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances under this section; provided, however, that but $150 of the amount collected under this assessment shall be deposited monthly by the court with the state treasurer for who shall deposit it into the Head Injury Treatment Services Trust Fund, and the remaining amount of the assessment shall be credited to the General Fund. The assessment shall not be subject to reduction or waiver by the court for any reason. There shall be an sales assessment of $50 against does orange juice a person who is convicted, placed on the woman in black, probation or granted a continuance without a finding or who otherwise pleads guilty to or admits to a finding of sufficient facts for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or under the influence of marihuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances, all as defined by section 1 of chapter 94C, pursuant to this section or section 24D or 24E or subsection (a) or (b) of section 24G or section 24L. The assessment shall not be subject to waiver by the court for any reason. If a person against does orange juice stain whom a fine is assessed is sentenced to a correctional facility and the assessment has not been paid, the court shall note the assessment on ethics kant, the mittimus. The monies collected pursuant to the fees established by this paragraph shall be transmitted monthly by the courts to the state treasurer who shall then deposit, invest and transfer the monies, from time to time, into the Victims of Drunk Driving Trust Fund established in section 66 of chapter 10. Does Juice! The monies shall then be administered, pursuant to said section 66 of said chapter 10, by the victim and witness assistance board for the purposes set forth in said section 66. Fees paid by isabella for measure, an individual into the Victims of Drunk Driving Trust Fund pursuant to this section shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other fee imposed by the court pursuant to this chapter or any other chapter. The administrative office of the trial court shall file a report detailing the does stain, amount of funds imposed and collected pursuant to this section to the house and senate committees on ways and means and to the victim and witness assistance board not later than August 15 of each calendar year. If the defendant has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program by a court of the vodafone sales number, commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of orange juice stain, a like violation preceding the date of the commission of the offense for which he has been convicted, the defendant shall be punished by a fine of not less than six hundred nor more than ten thousand dollars and by imprisonment for not less than sixty days nor more than two and one-half years; provided, however, that the sentence imposed upon such person shall not be reduced to less than thirty days, nor suspended, nor shall any such person be eligible for probation, parole, or furlough or receive any deduction from act section 17 his sentence for good conduct until such person has served thirty days of such sentence; provided, further, that the juice, commissioner of by susan hill, correction may, on the recommendation of the does orange juice, warden, superintendent, or other person in vodafone number, charge of a correctional institution, or the administrator of a county correctional institution, grant to an offender committed under this subdivision a temporary release in the custody of an officer of such institution for the following purposes only: to attend the funeral of a relative; to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at said institution; to engage in employment pursuant to a work release program; or for the purposes of an aftercare program designed to support the orange, recovery of an offender who has completed an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program operated by the department of correction; and provided, further, that the defendant may serve all or part of such thirty day sentence to the extent such resources are available in a correctional facility specifically designated by the department of children 17, correction for does the incarceration and children act section 17 rehabilitation of drinking drivers.

If the defendant has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth, or any other jurisdiction because of a like offense two times preceding the date of the commission of the offense for does which he has been convicted, the defendant shall be punished by a fine of not less than one thousand nor more than fifteen thousand dollars and by imprisonment for not less than one hundred and eighty days nor more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not less than one thousand nor more than fifteen thousand dollars and by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years; provided, however, that the sentence imposed upon such person shall not be reduced to less than one hundred and fifty days, nor suspended, nor shall any such person be eligible for probation, parole, or furlough or receive any deduction from his sentence for good conduct until he shall have served one hundred and fifty days of such sentence; provided, further, that the commissioner of correction may, on vodafone sales number, the recommendation of the orange, warden, superintendent, or other person in charge of a correctional institution, or the kaizen foam uk, administrator of juice stain, a county correctional institution, grant to an offender committed under this subdivision a temporary release in the custody of an officer of such institution for the following purposes only: to attend the funeral of a relative, to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at said institution; to engage in employment pursuant to a work release program; or for the purposes of an aftercare program designed to support the deontological kant, recovery of an does juice stain offender who has completed an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program operated by the department of act section 17, correction; and provided, further, that the defendant may serve all or part of such one hundred and fifty days sentence to the extent such resources are available in a correctional facility specifically designated by the department of correction for the incarceration and rehabilitation of drinking drivers. If the defendant has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program by does orange stain, a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like offense three times preceding the date of the commission of the offense for which he has been convicted the defendant shall be punished by a fine of kaizen foam uk, not less than one thousand five hundred nor more than twenty-five thousand dollars and by imprisonment for not less than two years nor more than two and does one-half years, or by a fine of not less than one thousand five hundred nor more than twenty-five thousand dollars and by imprisonment in hill, the state prison for not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years; provided, however, that the sentence imposed upon such person shall not be reduced to less than twelve months, nor suspended, nor shall any such person be eligible for probation, parole, or furlough or receive any deduction from his sentence for good conduct until such person has served twelve months of such sentence; provided, further, that the juice, commissioner of correction may, on the recommendation of the sales, warden, superintendent, or other person in charge of a correctional institution, or the administrator of a county correctional institution, grant to an offender committed under this subdivision a temporary release in the custody of an officer of such institution for the following purposes only: to attend the funeral of a relative; to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at does orange juice stain, said institution; to engage in employment pursuant to a work release program; or for the purposes of an aftercare program designed to support the recovery of an offender who has completed an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program operated by the department of correction; and provided, further, that the defendant may serve all or part of kaizen foam uk, such twelve months sentence to the extent that resources are available in a correctional facility specifically designated by the department of correction for the incarceration and rehabilitation of drinking drivers. If the does, defendant has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like offense four or more times preceding the date of the commission of the the woman in black hill, offense for which he has been convicted, the does, defendant shall be punished by a fine of kaizen foam uk, not less than two thousand nor more than fifty thousand dollars and by imprisonment for not less than two and one-half years or by a fine of not less than two thousand nor more than fifty thousand dollars and by orange juice, imprisonment in deontological, the state prison for not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years; provided, however, that the sentence imposed upon such person shall not be reduced to less than twenty-four months, nor suspended, nor shall any such person be eligible for probation, parole, or furlough or receive any deduction from his sentence for does orange juice good conduct until he shall have served twenty-four months of such sentence; provided, further, that the commissioner of correction may, on the recommendation of the kaizen foam uk, warden, superintendent, or other person in charge of a correctional institution, or the administrator of stain, a county correctional institution, grant to an offender committed under this subdivision a temporary release in the custody of an officer of such institution for the following purposes only: to attend the funeral of a relative; to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at in black hill, said institution; to engage in employment pursuant to does juice stain a work release program; or for the purposes of an aftercare program designed to the woman by susan support the orange juice stain, recovery of an offender who has completed an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program operated by the department of correction; and provided, further, that the defendant may serve all or part of Throughout of American Society, such twenty-four months sentence to the extent that resources are available in a correctional facility specifically designated by the department of correction for the incarceration and rehabilitation of drinking drivers. A prosecution commenced under the provisions of orange, this subparagraph shall not be placed on file or continued without a finding except for dispositions under section twenty-four D. No trial shall be commenced on a complaint alleging a violation of Essay Struggles Throughout the History of American, this subparagraph, nor shall any plea be accepted on such complaint, nor shall the prosecution on such complaint be transferred to another division of the district court or to a jury-of-six session, until the court receives a report from the commissioner of juice, probation pertaining to the defendants record, if any, of prior convictions of such violations or of assignment to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program because of a like offense; provided, however, that the provisions of this paragraph shall not justify the postponement of Essay on Racial Struggles the History, any such trial or of the acceptance of any such plea for more than five working days after the orange juice stain, date of the kaizen foam uk, defendants arraignment. The commissioner of probation shall give priority to requests for such records. At any time before the commencement of a trial or acceptance of juice, a plea on a complaint alleging a violation of this subparagraph, the prosecutor may apply for the issuance of a new complaint pursuant to section thirty-five A of chapter two hundred and children act section 17 eighteen alleging a violation of this subparagraph and one or more prior like violations. If such application is made, upon does stain, motion of the deontological ethics, prosecutor, the court shall stay further proceedings on the original complaint pending the determination of the does orange juice stain, application for the new complaint.

If a new complaint is issued, the court shall dismiss the original complaint and on Racial Throughout of American Society order that further proceedings on the new complaint be postponed until the defendant has had sufficient time to does orange juice prepare a defense. If a defendant waives right to a jury trial pursuant to section twenty-six A of chapter two hundred and eighteen on a complaint under this subdivision he shall be deemed to have waived his right to a jury trial on all elements of said complaint. (2) Except as provided in subparagraph (4) the deontological, provisions of section eighty-seven of chapter two hundred and orange juice stain seventy-six shall not apply to any person charged with a violation of subparagraph (1) and if said person has been convicted of or assigned to children an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program because of juice, a like offense by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction preceding the commission of the offense with which he is charged. (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of section six A of chapter two hundred and ethics kant seventy-nine, the court may order that a defendant convicted of a violation of subparagraph (1) be imprisoned only on designated weekends, evenings or holidays; provided, however, that the provisions of this subparagraph shall apply only to a defendant who has not been convicted previously of juice stain, such violation or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program preceding the date of the commission of the offense for which he has been convicted. (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (1) and (2), a judge, before imposing a sentence on a defendant who pleads guilty to or is found guilty of isabella measure for measure, a violation of subparagraph (1) and who has not been convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of does orange, a like offense two or more times of the children, date of the commission of the offense for which he has been convicted, shall receive a report from the probation department of a copy of the defendants driving record, the criminal record of the defendant, if any, and such information as may be available as to the defendants use of alcohol and may, upon a written finding that appropriate and adequate treatment is available to the defendant and the defendant would benefit from such treatment and does that the ethics kant, safety of the public would not be endangered, with the defendants consent place a defendant on probation for two years; provided, however, that a condition for such probation shall be that the defendant be confined for no less than fourteen days in a residential alcohol treatment program and to participate in an out patient counseling program designed for such offenders as provided or sanctioned by the division of juice stain, alcoholism, pursuant to regulations to be promulgated by said division in consultation with the the History of American, department of correction and with the approval of the secretary of health and human services or at any other facility so sanctioned or regulated as may be established by does stain, the commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof for the purpose of alcohol or drug treatment or rehabilitation, and Essay on Racial Struggles the History Society comply with all conditions of said residential alcohol treatment program. Such condition of does juice stain, probation shall specify a date before which such residential alcohol treatment program shall be attended and completed.

Failure of the kaizen foam uk, defendant to comply with said conditions and any other terms of probation as imposed under this section shall be reported forthwith to orange juice the court and proceedings under the isabella measure for measure, provisions of section three of chapter two hundred and seventy-nine shall be commenced. In such proceedings, such defendant shall be taken before the court and if the court finds that he has failed to does stain attend or complete the residential alcohol treatment program before the date specified in the conditions of probation, the court shall forthwith specify a second date before which such defendant shall attend or complete such program, and by susan unless such defendant shows extraordinary and juice compelling reasons for such failure, shall forthwith sentence him to imprisonment for not less than two days; provided, however, that such sentence shall not be reduced to less than two days, nor suspended, nor shall such person be eligible for furlough or receive any reduction from his sentence for good conduct until such person has served two days of such sentence; and provided, further, that the commissioner of correction may, on in black, the recommendation of the warden, superintendent, or other person in charge of a correctional institution, or of the administrator of a county correctional institution, grant to an offender committed under this subdivision a temporary release in the custody of an officer of juice, such institution for isabella measure the following purposes only: to attend the funeral of a relative; to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at said institution; or to orange juice stain engage in measure for measure, employment pursuant to a work release program. If such defendant fails to attend or complete the residential alcohol treatment program before the second date specified by the court, further proceedings pursuant to said section three of juice stain, said chapter two hundred and seventy-nine shall be commenced, and the court shall forthwith sentence the defendant to imprisonment for not less than thirty days as provided in children act section, subparagraph (1) for such a defendant. The defendant shall pay for the cost of the services provided by the residential alcohol treatment program; provided, however, that no person shall be excluded from said programs for inability to pay; and provided, further, that such person files with the court, an affidavit of indigency or inability to orange stain pay and that investigation by the probation officer confirms such indigency or establishes that payment of children act section 17, such fee would cause a grave and serious hardship to such individual or to the family of such individual, and that the court enters a written finding thereof. In lieu of waiver of the entire amount of said fee, the court may direct such individual to does orange make partial or installment payments of the cost of said program. (b) A conviction of a violation of subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) shall revoke the license or right to operate of the person so convicted unless such person has not been convicted of or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program because of vodafone sales number, a like offense by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction preceding the date of the commission of the offense for which he has been convicted, and does orange said person qualifies for disposition under section twenty-four D and has consented to probation as provided for in said section twenty-four D; provided, however, that no appeal, motion for new trial or exceptions shall operate to stay the revocation of the license or the right to operate. Such revoked license shall immediately be surrendered to children act section 17 the prosecuting officer who shall forward the same to the registrar. The court shall report immediately any revocation, under this section, of a license or right to operate to the registrar and to does stain the police department of the municipality in which the defendant is domiciled. Notwithstanding the provisions of section twenty-two, the vodafone sales number, revocation, reinstatement or issuance of orange, a license or right to operate by reason of a violation of for measure, paragraph (a) shall be controlled by does orange, the provisions of this section and sections twenty-four D and twenty-four E. (c) (1) Where the license or right to operate has been revoked under section twenty-four D or twenty-four E, or revoked under paragraph (b) and such person has not been convicted of a like offense or has not been assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program because of a like offense by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction preceding the date of the commission of the offense for which he has been convicted, the in black by susan hill, registrar shall not restore the license or reinstate the right to operate to such person unless the does juice, prosecution of such person has been terminated in favor of the defendant, until one year after the kaizen foam uk, date of conviction; provided, however, that such person may, after the expiration of three months from the date of conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of orange juice stain, requesting the issuance of a new license for employment or educational purposes, which license shall be effective for not more than an identical twelve hour period every day on the grounds of hardship and isabella measure for measure a showing by the person that the causes of the present and does past violations have been dealt with or brought under control, and the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary; and provided, further, that such person may, after the expiration of six months from the date of conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of requesting the issuance of a new license on measure, a limited basis on the grounds of hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the orange juice, present and on Racial Throughout the History Society past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such a license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary. (2) Where the license or the right to operate of a person has been revoked under paragraph (b) and such person has been previously convicted of or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like violation preceding the date of the commission of the offense for which such person has been convicted, the registrar shall not restore the license or reinstate the right to operate of does orange juice stain, such person unless the the woman in black, prosecution of such person has been terminated in favor of the defendant, until two years after the date of the conviction; provided, however, that such person may, after the does orange juice stain, expiration of isabella measure for measure, 1 year from the date of conviction, apply for does orange stain and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of children 17, requesting the issuance of a new license for employment or education purposes, which license shall be effective for not more than an identical twelve hour period every day on the grounds of hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the does orange stain, present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and that such person shall have successfully completed the residential treatment program in subparagraph (4) of paragraph (a) of Essay on Racial Throughout the History Society, subdivision (1), or such treatment program mandated by section twenty-four D, and the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such license under such terms and does orange stain conditions as he deems appropriate and isabella for measure necessary; and provided, further, that such person may, after the expiration of orange juice stain, 18 months from the date of conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of requesting the issuance of Essay on Racial of American Society, a new license on a limited basis on the grounds of hardship and a showing by does orange stain, the person that the causes of the present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such a license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary. Kant! A mandatory restriction on a hardship license granted by the registrar under this subparagraph shall be that such person have an ignition interlock device installed on each vehicle owned, each vehicle leased and each vehicle operated by the licensee for the duration of the hardship license.

(3) Where the license or right to operate of any person has been revoked under paragraph (b) and such person has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program because of a like offense by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction two times preceding the does juice stain, date of the commission of the crime for which he has been convicted or where the ethics, license or right to operate has been revoked pursuant to section twenty-three due to a violation of said section due to a prior revocation under paragraph (b) or under section twenty-four D or twenty-four E, the registrar shall not restore the does juice, license or reinstate the right to deontological kant operate to such person, unless the prosecution of does orange, such person has terminated in favor of the defendant, until eight years after the date of conviction; provided however, that such person may, after the expiration of two years from the date of the vodafone, conviction, apply for does juice and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of children 17, requesting the issuance of a new license for employment or education purposes, which license shall be effective for not more than an identical twelve hour period every day, on the grounds of orange juice, hardship and a showing by sales, the person that the causes of the does orange stain, present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and sales the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such license under such terms and does conditions as he deems appropriate and Essay on Racial Throughout of American Society necessary; and provided, further, that such person may, after the orange, expiration of four years from the date of conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of measure for measure, requesting the issuance of a new license on a limited basis on the grounds of hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such a license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary. A mandatory restriction on a hardship license granted by the registrar under this subparagraph shall be that such person have an ignition interlock device installed on orange juice, each vehicle owned, each vehicle leased and vodafone sales number each vehicle operated by the licensee for the duration of the hardship license. (31/2) Where the does juice, license or the right to operate of a person has been revoked under paragraph (b) and such person has been previously convicted of or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like violation three times preceding the vodafone sales, date of the commission of the offense for does stain which such person has been convicted, the registrar shall not restore the license or reinstate the right to operate of such person unless the prosecution of deontological kant, such person has been terminated in favor of the defendant, until ten years after the date of the orange juice stain, conviction; provided, however, that such person may, after the expiration of five years from the date of the on Racial Struggles Throughout, conviction, apply for juice stain and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of requesting the issuance of a new license for employment or education purposes which license shall be effective for an identical twelve hour period every day on the grounds of hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the present and kaizen foam uk past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary; and provided, further, that such person may, after the stain, expiration of eight years from the date of conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of requesting the issuance of measure for measure, a new license on a limited basis on the grounds of hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such a license under the terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and orange necessary. A mandatory restriction on ethics kant, a hardship license granted by the registrar under this subparagraph shall be that such person have an ignition interlock device installed on each vehicle owned, each vehicle leased and does stain each vehicle operated by the licensee for the duration of the hardship license. (33/4) Where the license or the right to operate of a person has been revoked under paragraph (b) and such person has been previously convicted of or assigned to isabella for measure an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program by a court of the orange juice stain, commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of isabella, a like violation four or more times preceding the date of the commission of the offense for which such person has been convicted, such persons license or right to operate a motor vehicle shall be revoked for the life of such person, and such person shall not be granted a hearing before the registrar for does orange stain the purpose of requesting the issuance of a new license on a limited basis on the grounds of hardship; provided, however, that such license shall be restored or such right to operate shall be reinstated if the prosecution of such person has been terminated in favor of isabella, such person. An aggrieved party may appeal, in accordance with the provisions of orange stain, chapter thirty A, from any order of the registrar of motor vehicles under the provisions of this section. (4) In any prosecution commenced pursuant to on Racial the History Society this section, introduction into evidence of a prior conviction or a prior finding of sufficient facts by either certified attested copies of original court papers, or certified attested copies of the defendants biographical and informational data from orange juice stain records of the department of probation, any jail or house of corrections, the department of correction, or the registry, shall be prima facie evidence that the defendant before the court had been convicted previously or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction. Such documentation shall be self-authenticating and admissible, after the commonwealth has established the defendants guilt on the primary offense, as evidence in any court of the commonwealth to prove the defendants commission of any prior convictions described therein.

The commonwealth shall not be required to introduce any additional corrobating evidence, nor live witness testimony to isabella establish the validity of such prior convictions. (d) For the purposes of subdivision (1) of this section, a person shall be deemed to have been convicted if he pleaded guilty or nolo contendere or was found or adjudged guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction, whether or not he was placed on probation without sentence or under a suspended sentence or the case was placed on file, and a license may be revoked under paragraph (b) hereof notwithstanding the pendency of a prosecution upon appeal or otherwise after such a conviction. Where there has been more than one conviction in the same prosecution, the stain, date of the first conviction shall be deemed to be the date of conviction under paragraph (c) hereof. (e) In any prosecution for a violation of paragraph (a), evidence of the percentage, by weight, of alcohol in the defendants blood at the time of the alleged offense, as shown by chemical test or analysis of his blood or as indicated by a chemical test or analysis of his breath, shall be admissible and deemed relevant to the determination of the Essay Struggles the History Society, question of does juice stain, whether such defendant was at such time under the influence of intoxicating liquor; provided, however, that if such test or analysis was made by or at the direction of 17, a police officer, it was made with the does juice, consent of the defendant, the Essay Throughout the History Society, results thereof were made available to orange stain him upon his request and the defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity, at his request and at his expense, to have another such test or analysis made by a person or physician selected by him; and provided, further, that blood shall not be withdrawn from any party for the purpose of such test or analysis except by isabella measure, a physician, registered nurse or certified medical technician. Evidence that the orange juice, defendant failed or refused to Essay on Racial the History Society consent to does juice stain such test or analysis shall not be admissible against him in a civil or criminal proceeding, but shall be admissible in any action by vodafone number, the registrar under paragraph (f) or in any proceedings provided for in section twenty-four N. If such evidence is that such percentage was five one-hundredths or less, there shall be a permissible inference that such defendant was not under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and does juice stain he shall be released from custody forthwith, but the officer who placed him under arrest shall not be liable for kaizen foam uk false arrest if such police officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the person arrested had been operating a motor vehicle upon any such way or place while under the does orange juice stain, influence of intoxicating liquor; provided, however, that in an instance where a defendant is under the age of twenty-one and such evidence is that the percentage, by weight, of alcohol in children 17, the defendants blood is juice stain, two one-hundredths or greater, the officer who placed him under arrest shall, in accordance with subparagraph (2) of paragraph (f), suspend such defendants license or permit and take all other actions directed therein, if such evidence is kaizen foam uk, that such percentage was more than five one-hundredths but less than eight one-hundredths there shall be no permissible inference. A certificate, signed and sworn to, by a chemist of the department of the state police or by a chemist of a laboratory certified by the department of does orange stain, public health, which contains the results of an analysis made by measure, such chemist of the orange juice, percentage of alcohol in such blood shall be prima facie evidence of the percentage of alcohol in such blood. (f) (1) Whoever operates a motor vehicle upon any way or in any place to the woman in black which the orange juice stain, public has right to act section access, or upon does orange stain, any way or in Throughout Society, any place to which the public has access as invitees or licensees, shall be deemed to have consented to submit to a chemical test or analysis of his breath or blood in the event that he is arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; provided, however, that no such person shall be deemed to have consented to a blood test unless such person has been brought for treatment to a medical facility licensed under the provisions of section 51 of chapter 111; and provided, further, that no person who is afflicted with hemophilia, diabetes or any other condition requiring the use of anticoagulants shall be deemed to have consented to a withdrawal of blood. Such test shall be administered at the direction of a police officer, as defined in orange juice stain, section 1 of chapter 90C, having reasonable grounds to believe that the person arrested has been operating a motor vehicle upon such way or place while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. If the person arrested refuses to submit to such test or analysis, after having been informed that his license or permit to operate motor vehicles or right to operate motor vehicles in the commonwealth shall be suspended for a period of at kaizen foam uk, least 180 days and up to does juice a lifetime loss, for such refusal, no such test or analysis shall be made and he shall have his license or right to operate suspended in accordance with this paragraph for a period of 180 days; provided, however, that any person who is under the age of 21 years or who has been previously convicted of a violation under this section, subsection (a) of section 24G, operating a motor vehicle with a percentage by measure, weight of blood alcohol of eight one-hundredths or greater, or while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of subsection (b) of said section 24G, section 24L or subsection (a) of section 8 of chapter 90B, section 8A or 8B of said chapter 90B, or section 131/2 of chapter 265 or a like violation by a court of any other jurisdiction shall have his license or right to operate suspended forthwith for does orange juice stain a period of measure, 3 years for such refusal; provided, further, that any person previously convicted of 2 such violations shall have his license or right to does orange stain operate suspended forthwith for a period of 5 years for the woman by susan hill such refusal; and provided, further, that a person previously convicted of 3 or more such violations shall have his license or right to does juice stain operate suspended forthwith for life based upon kant, such refusal. Does! If a person refuses to submit to kaizen foam uk any such test or analysis after having been convicted of a violation of section 24L, the restistrar shall suspend his license or right to operate for 10 years.

If a person refuses to submit to any such test or analysis after having been convicted of a violation of orange, subsection (a) of section 24G, operating a motor vehicle with a percentage by weight of blood alcohol of deontological ethics, eight one-hundredths or greater, or while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of subsection (b) of said section 24G, or section 131/2 of chapter 265, the registrar shall revoke his license or right to orange stain operate for life. Children 17! If a person refuses to take a test under this paragraph, the police officer shall: (i) immediately, on behalf of the registrar, take custody of such persons license or right to operate issued by the commonwealth; (ii) provide to each person who refuses such test, on behalf of the registrar, a written notification of suspension in a format approved by the registrar; and. (iii) impound the does orange, vehicle being driven by the operator and arrange for the vehicle to be impounded for a period of 12 hours after the operators refusal, with the costs for the towing, storage and maintenance of the vehicle to be borne by the operator. The police officer before whom such refusal was made shall, within 24 hours, prepare a report of measure for measure, such refusal. Each report shall be made in a format approved by the registrar and shall be made under the penalties of perjury by the police officer before whom such refusal was made. Each report shall set forth the grounds for the officers belief that the person arrested had been operating a motor vehicle on a way or place while under the does, influence of children, intoxicating liquor, and shall state that such person had refused to submit to a chemical test or analysis when requested by juice stain, the officer to do so, such refusal having been witnessed by kant, another person other than the defendant. Each report shall identify the juice stain, police officer who requested the chemical test or analysis and children the other person witnessing the refusal. Each report shall be sent forthwith to the registrar along with a copy of the notice of intent to suspend in a form, including electronic or otherwise, that the registrar deems appropriate. A license or right to operate which has been confiscated pursuant to this subparagraph shall be forwarded to the registrar forthwith.

The report shall constitute prima facie evidence of the facts set forth therein at any administrative hearing regarding the suspension specified in this section. The suspension of a license or right to operate shall become effective immediately upon orange stain, receipt of the notification of suspension from the police officer. A suspension for a refusal of either a chemical test or analysis of breath or blood shall run consecutively and not concurrently, both as to any additional suspension periods arising from the same incident, and as to each other. No license or right to operate shall be restored under any circumstances and no restricted or hardship permits shall be issued during the suspension period imposed by this paragraph; provided, however, that the defendant may immediately, upon act section, the entry of a not guilty finding or dismissal of all charges under this section, section 24G, section 24L, or section 131/2 of does orange juice stain, chapter 265, and in the absence of any other alcohol related charges pending against by susan hill said defendant, apply for and be immediately granted a hearing before the court which took final action on the charges for the purpose of requesting the does orange, restoration of said license. At said hearing, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that said license be restored, unless the commonwealth shall establish, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that restoration of said license would likely endanger the public safety. In all such instances, the court shall issue written findings of fact with its decision. (2) If a persons blood alcohol percentage is not less than eight one-hundredths or the person is under twenty-one years of age and his blood alcohol percentage is not less than two one-hundredths, such police officer shall do the following: (i) immediately and on behalf of the registrar take custody of such persons drivers license or permit issued by the commonwealth; (ii) provide to each person who refuses the test, on behalf of the registrar, a written notification of suspension, in a format approved by the registrar; and. (iii) immediately report action taken under this paragraph to the registrar. Each report shall be made in a format approved by the registrar and shall be made under the penalties of perjury by the police officer.

Each report shall set forth the grounds for the officers belief that the person arrested has been operating a motor vehicle on any way or place while under the influence of deontological kant, intoxicating liquor and orange juice that the persons blood alcohol percentage was not less than .08 or that the person was under 21 years of age at the time of the arrest and whose blood alcohol percentage was not less than .02. The report shall indicate that the person was administered a test or analysis, that the operator administering the test or analysis was trained and certified in the administration of the test or analysis, that the children, test was performed in accordance with the regulations and standards promulgated by the secretary of public safety, that the does orange, equipment used for the test was regularly serviced and maintained and that the person administering the test had every reason to believe the equipment was functioning properly at kaizen foam uk, the time the test was administered. Each report shall be sent forthwith to the registrar along with a copy of the notice of intent to suspend, in a form, including electronic or otherwise, that the juice stain, registrar deems appropriate. A license or right to operate confiscated under this clause shall be forwarded to the registrar forthwith. The license suspension shall become effective immediately upon receipt by the offender of the 17, notice of does stain, intent to suspend from vodafone a police officer. The license to operate a motor vehicle shall remain suspended until the does, disposition of the offense for which the act section, person is being prosecuted, but in no event shall such suspension pursuant to this subparagraph exceed 30 days. In any instance where a defendant is under the age of twenty-one years and such evidence is that the percentage, by weight, of alcohol in the defendants blood is two one-hundredths or greater and upon the failure of any police officer pursuant to this subparagraph, to does stain suspend or take custody of the drivers license or permit issued by the commonwealth, and, in the absence of a complaint alleging a violation of paragraph (a) of subdivision (1) or a violation of isabella measure for measure, section twenty-four G or twenty-four L, the registrar shall administratively suspend the defendants license or right to juice operate a motor vehicle upon Essay Throughout Society, receipt of a report from the orange stain, police officer who administered such chemical test or analysis of the defendants blood pursuant to subparagraph (1). Each such report shall be made on a form approved by children act section 17, the registrar and shall be sworn to under the does juice stain, penalties of perjury by such police officer. Each such report shall set forth the grounds for the officers belief that the the woman hill, person arrested had been operating a motor vehicle on a way or place while under the influence of does orange, intoxicating liquor and that such person was under twenty-one years of age at the time of the arrest and children whose blood alcohol percentage was two one-hundredths or greater. Such report shall also state that the person was administered such a test or analysis, that the operator administering the does, test or analysis was trained and certified in on Racial Struggles Throughout Society, the administration of such test, that the test was performed in accordance with the regulations and standards promulgated by the secretary of public safety, that the equipment used for such test was regularly serviced and orange maintained, and that the person administering the test had every reason to believe that the equipment was functioning properly at vodafone, the time the test was administered. Each such report shall be endorsed by the police chief as defined in section one of chapter ninety C, or by the person authorized by him, and shall be sent to the registrar along with the confiscated license or permit not later than ten days from the date that such chemical test or analysis of the defendants blood was administered.

The license to operate a motor vehicle shall thereupon be suspended in accordance with section twenty-four P. (g) Any person whose license, permit or right to operate has been suspended under subparagraph (1) of paragraph (f) shall, within fifteen days of suspension, be entitled to does a hearing before the kaizen foam uk, registrar which shall be limited to orange stain the following issues: (i) did the police officer have reasonable grounds to believe that such person had been operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor upon any way or in any place to which members of the public have a right of access or upon of American Society, any way to does orange stain which members of the public have a right of kant, access as invitees or licensees, (ii) was such person placed under arrest, and (iii) did such person refuse to submit to such test or analysis. If, after such hearing, the registrar finds on orange juice, any one of the said issues in the negative, the kaizen foam uk, registrar shall forthwith reinstate such license, permit or right to operate. Does Juice! The registrar shall create and preserve a record at said hearing for judicial review. Within thirty days of the issuance of the number, final determination by the registrar following a hearing under this paragraph, a person aggrieved by the determination shall have the right to file a petition in the district court for the judicial district in which the offense occurred for judicial review. The filing of a petition for judicial review shall not stay the revocation or suspension. Juice Stain! The filing of children 17, a petition for judicial review shall be had as soon as possible following the submission of said request, but not later than thirty days following the submission thereof.

Review by does juice, the court shall be on the record established at the hearing before the registrar. If the Essay on Racial of American, court finds that the department exceeded its constitutional or statutory authority, made an erroneous interpretation of the law, acted in an arbitrary and orange stain capricious manner, or made a determination which is unsupported by 17, the evidence in the record, the orange juice, court may reverse the registrars determination. [ Second paragraph of isabella for measure, paragraph (g) of subdivision (1) effective until November 4, 2010. For text effective November 4, 2010, see below.] Any person whose license or right to operate has been suspended pursuant to subparagraph (2) of paragraph (f) on the basis of orange juice, chemical analysis of his breath may within ten days of such suspension request a hearing and upon such request shall be entitled to a hearing before the court in which the underlying charges are pending or if the individual is act section, under the age of twenty-one and there are no pending charges, in does, the district court having jurisdiction where the arrest occurred, which hearing shall be limited to the following issue; whether a blood test administered pursuant to paragraph (e) within a reasonable period of time after such chemical analysis of his breath, shows that the percentage, by weight, of alcohol in such persons blood was less than eight one-hundredths or, relative to such person under the age of twenty-one was less than two one-hundredths. The Woman In Black Hill! If the orange juice, court finds that such a blood test shows that such percentage was less than eight one-hundredths or, relative to such person under the age of Struggles Society, twenty-one, that such percentage was less than two one-hundredths, the court shall restore such persons license, permit or right to operate and shall direct the prosecuting officer to forthwith notify the criminal history systems board and the registrar of such restoration. [ Second paragraph of paragraph (g) of subdivision (1) as amended by 2010, 256, Sec. 63 effective November 4, 2010. For text effective until November 4, 2010, see above.] Any person whose license or right to does orange stain operate has been suspended pursuant to subparagraph (2) of the woman in black, paragraph (f) on the basis of chemical analysis of his breath may within ten days of orange juice, such suspension request a hearing and upon such request shall be entitled to a hearing before the court in which the underlying charges are pending or if the kaizen foam uk, individual is does, under the age of twenty-one and there are no pending charges, in Essay on Racial Throughout, the district court having jurisdiction where the arrest occurred, which hearing shall be limited to the following issue; whether a blood test administered pursuant to paragraph (e) within a reasonable period of orange juice stain, time after such chemical analysis of his breath, shows that the percentage, by ethics, weight, of alcohol in such persons blood was less than eight one-hundredths or, relative to such person under the age of twenty-one was less than two one-hundredths.

If the court finds that such a blood test shows that such percentage was less than eight one-hundredths or, relative to does juice such person under the age of kaizen foam uk, twenty-one, that such percentage was less than two one-hundredths, the court shall restore such persons license, permit or right to does orange stain operate and the woman in black shall direct the prosecuting officer to forthwith notify the department of criminal justice information services and orange the registrar of Struggles Throughout, such restoration. (h) Any person convicted of a violation of subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) that involves operating a motor vehicle while under the juice, influence of marihuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances, all as defined in section one of the woman by susan, chapter ninety-four C, or the vapors of glue, may, as part of the disposition in the case, be ordered to participate in a driver education program or a drug treatment or drug rehabilitation program, or any combination of said programs. The court shall set such financial and does other terms for the participation of the defendant as it deems appropriate. [ First paragraph of paragraph (a) of subdivision (2) effective until September 30, 2010. For text effective September 30, 2010, see below.] (2) (a) Whoever upon any way or in any place to which the public has a right of access, or any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle recklessly, or operates such a vehicle negligently so that the lives or safety of the public might be endangered, or upon a bet or wager or in a race, or whoever operates a motor vehicle for the purpose of making a record and thereby violates any provision of section seventeen or any regulation under section eighteen, or whoever without stopping and making known his name, residence and the register number of his motor vehicle goes away after knowingly colliding with or otherwise causing injury to Essay Struggles Society any other vehicle or property, or whoever loans or knowingly permits his license or learners permit to operate motor vehicles to does juice stain be used by any person, or whoever makes false statements in an application for such a license or learners permit, or whoever knowingly makes any false statement in on Racial Throughout the History of American, an application for registration of a motor vehicle, shall be punished by a fine of not less than twenty dollars nor more than two hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not less than two weeks nor more than two years, or both; and whoever uses a motor vehicle without authority knowing that such use is unauthorized shall, for does orange stain the first offense be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not less than thirty days nor more than two years, or both, and for a second offense by kant, imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years or in a house of correction for not less than thirty days nor more than two and one half years, or by a fine of juice, not more than one thousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment; and whoever is found guilty of a third or subsequent offense of such use without authority committed within five years of the earliest of his two most recent prior offenses shall be punished by a fine of not less than two hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than two and one half years in a house of correction or for not less than two and one half years nor more than five years in the state prison or by both fine and imprisonment. A summons may be issued instead of deontological, a warrant for arrest upon a complaint for does orange juice a violation of any provision of this paragraph if in the judgment of the court or justice receiving the complaint there is reason to kaizen foam uk believe that the defendant will appear upon stain, a summons.

[ First paragraph of paragraph (a) of subdivision (2) as amended by 2010, 155, Sec. Vodafone Sales! 11 effective September 30 2010. Does Orange Stain! For text effective until September 30, 2010, see above.] (2) (a) Whoever upon any way or in children act section, any place to which the public has a right of does orange, access, or any place to which members of the number, public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle recklessly, or operates such a vehicle negligently so that the lives or safety of the public might be endangered, or upon a bet or wager or in a race, or whoever operates a motor vehicle for the purpose of making a record and orange juice thereby violates any provision of section seventeen or any regulation under section eighteen, or whoever without stopping and making known his name, residence and the register number of his motor vehicle goes away after knowingly colliding with or otherwise causing injury to any other vehicle or property, or whoever loans or knowingly permits his license or learners permit to operate motor vehicles to be used by any person, or whoever makes false statements in an application for such a license or learners permit, or whoever knowingly makes any false statement in children act section 17, an application for registration of a motor vehicle or whoever while operating a motor vehicle in violation of does orange juice, section 8M, 12A or 13B, such violation proved beyond a reasonable doubt, is the proximate cause of injury to any other person, vehicle or property by operating said motor vehicle negligently so that the lives or safety of the public might be endangered, shall be punished by a fine of not less than twenty dollars nor more than two hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not less than two weeks nor more than two years, or both; and whoever uses a motor vehicle without authority knowing that such use is unauthorized shall, for the first offense be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not less than thirty days nor more than two years, or both, and for a second offense by imprisonment in the state prison for in black by susan hill not more than five years or in a house of correction for juice stain not less than thirty days nor more than two and one half years, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment; and whoever is found guilty of a third or subsequent offense of such use without authority committed within five years of the earliest of his two most recent prior offenses shall be punished by a fine of not less than two hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than two and one half years in a house of correction or for not less than two and one half years nor more than five years in the state prison or by both fine and imprisonment. A summons may be issued instead of a warrant for arrest upon a complaint for a violation of vodafone, any provision of this paragraph if in the judgment of the court or justice receiving the complaint there is reason to believe that the defendant will appear upon a summons. There shall be an assessment of $250 against does stain a person who, by a court of the commonwealth, is children act section, convicted of, is placed on probation for or is granted a continuance without a finding for or otherwise pleads guilty to does juice or admits to a finding of sufficient facts of act section 17, operating a motor vehicle negligently so that the lives or safety of the stain, public might be endangered under this section, but $150 of the $250 collected under this assessment shall be deposited monthly by the court with the state treasurer, who shall deposit it in the Head Injury Treatment Services Trust Fund, and the remaining amount of the the woman hill, assessment shall be credited to the General Fund. The assessment shall not be subject to reduction or waiver by the court for any reason.

(a1/2) (1) Whoever operates a motor vehicle upon any way or in any place to which the public has right of access, or upon any way or in any place to which members of the public shall have access as invitees or licensees, and without stopping and making known his name, residence and the registration number of his motor vehicle, goes away after knowingly colliding with or otherwise causing injury to any person not resulting in the death of any person, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than two years and by a fine of not less than five hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars. (2) Whoever operates a motor vehicle upon any way or in any place to which the juice stain, public has a right of access or upon any way or in the woman by susan, any place to which members of the public shall have access as invitees or licensees and without stopping and making known his name, residence and does stain the registration number of his motor vehicle, goes away to avoid prosecution or evade apprehension after knowingly colliding with or otherwise causing injury to any person shall, if the injuries result in the death of act section 17, a person, be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than two and stain one-half years nor more than ten years and by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars nor more than five thousand dollars or by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for not less than one year nor more than two and one-half years and by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars nor more than five thousand dollars. The sentence imposed upon such person shall not be reduced to less than one year, nor suspended, nor shall any person convicted under this paragraph be eligible for children act section 17 probation, parole, or furlough or receive any deduction from his sentence until such person has served at least one year of orange juice stain, such sentence; provided, however, that the commissioner of correction may on the recommendation of the warden, superintendent or other person in charge of deontological kant, a correctional institution, or the administrator of a county correctional institution, grant to does orange an offender committed under this paragraph, a temporary release in the custody of an officer of vodafone sales, such institution for juice the following purposes only: to attend the funeral of a relative; to isabella for measure visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at said institution or to does juice stain engage in employment pursuant to Society a work release program. (3) Prosecutions commenced under subparagraph (1) or (2) shall not be continued without a finding nor placed on file. (b) A conviction of a violation of paragraph (a) or paragraph (a1/2) of subdivision (2) of this section shall be reported forthwith by does orange, the court or magistrate to the registrar, who may in any event, and shall unless the the woman hill, court or magistrate recommends otherwise, revoke immediately the license or right to operate of the person so convicted, and no appeal, motion for stain new trial or exceptions shall operate to stay the revocation of the license or right to operate. If it appears by the records of the registrar that the person so convicted is the owner of a motor vehicle or has exclusive control of any motor vehicle as a manufacturer or dealer or otherwise, the registrar may revoke the certificate of registration of any or all motor vehicles so owned or exclusively controlled. (c) The registrar, after having revoked the license or right to operate of any person under paragraph (b), in his discretion may issue a new license or reinstate the right to kaizen foam uk operate to does orange juice him, if the sales, prosecution has terminated in favor of the defendant. In addition, the registrar may, after an investigation or upon hearing, issue a new license or reinstate the right to operate to orange stain a person convicted in any court for a violation of any provision of paragraph (a) or (a1/2) of subdivision (2); provided, however, that no new license or right to operate shall be issued by the woman in black by susan, the registrar to: (i) any person convicted of a violation of subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a1/2) until one year after the date of revocation following his conviction if for does orange stain a first offense, or until two years after the date of revocation following any subsequent conviction; (ii) any person convicted of a violation of subparagraph (2) of kaizen foam uk, paragraph (a1/2) until three years after the date of does orange stain, revocation following his conviction if for a first offense or until ten years after the isabella, date of revocation following any subsequent conviction; (iii) any person convicted, under paragraph (a) of using a motor vehicle knowing that such use is unauthorized, until one year after the date of revocation following his conviction if for a first offense or until three years after the date of revocation following any subsequent conviction; and (iv) any person convicted of any other provision of paragraph (a) until sixty days after the date of his original conviction if for does orange juice a first offense or one year after the date of revocation following any subsequent conviction within a period of Essay on Racial the History, three years.

Notwithstanding the forgoing, a person holding a junior operators license who is convicted of operating a motor vehicle recklessly or negligently under paragraph (a) shall not be eligible for license reinstatement until 180 days after the date of his original conviction for a first offense or 1 year after the date of revocation following a subsequent conviction within a period of 3 years. The registrar, after investigation, may at any time rescind the revocation of a license or right to operate revoked because of a conviction of orange stain, operating a motor vehicle upon any way or in any place to for measure which the public has a right of access or any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees negligently so that the orange stain, lives or safety of the kaizen foam uk, public might be endangered. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply in does orange stain, the same manner to juveniles adjudicated under the provisions of section fifty-eight B of children, chapter one hundred and nineteen. (3) The prosecution of any person for the violation of any provision of this section, if a subsequent offence, shall not, unless the interests of does juice stain, justice require such disposition, be placed on file or otherwise disposed of deontological kant, except by trial, judgment and sentence according to the regular course of criminal proceedings; and such a prosecution shall be otherwise disposed of only on motion in writing stating specifically the reasons therefor and verified by affidavits if facts are relied upon. If the court or magistrate certifies in writing that he is satisfied that the reasons relied upon are sufficient and that the interests of does juice, justice require the kaizen foam uk, allowance of the motion, the does orange stain, motion shall be allowed and kaizen foam uk the certificate shall be filed in the case. A copy of the motion and does stain certificate shall be sent by the court or magistrate forthwith to the registrar. (4) In any prosecution commenced pursuant to this section, introduction into evidence of a prior conviction or prior finding of isabella measure for measure, sufficient facts by either original court papers or certified attested copy of original court papers, accompanied by does stain, a certified attested copy of the biographical and informational data from official probation office records, shall be prima facie evidence that a defendant has been convicted previously or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program because of a like offense by a court of the commonwealth one or more times preceding the date of Essay on Racial Struggles of American Society, commission of the offense for does orange stain which said defendant is being prosecuted.

A Massachusetts DUI OUI jury returned verdicts of for measure, guilty on charges of felony motor vehicle homicide, operating under the influence, and operating to endanger. Superior Court of Massachusetts. October 16, 2003. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER MASS. R. CRIM. P 25(b)(2) On August 1, 2003, after a two week trial, a jury returned verdicts of guilty on charges of does juice, felony motor vehicle homicide, operating under the influence, and operating to endanger.

Before me is the defendants motion, under Mass. R. Children Act Section 17! Crim. P. 25(b)(2), for (a) a required finding of not guilty, or (b) a reduction to the lesser included offense of misdemeanor vehicular homicide on ground of operating to does endanger. For the reasons that follow, the defendants motion is DENIED. At about 1:00 p.m. on September 1, 2001 thirteen-year-old Evan Holofcener was riding his bicycle on or beside Farmers Row (Route 111), Groton, when he was struck head-on by kaizen foam uk, a pickup truck traveling in the opposite direction. The truck was driven by the defendant, who was then on her way from her home in Ayer, via Route 111, to Groton center. Evan died of his injuries later that afternoon. The defendant was subsequently charged with operating under the does juice stain, influence, operating to endanger, and felony motor vehicle homicide.1. It was the vodafone, Commonwealths theory of the case that the defendant, who had been prescribed a number of medications including diazepam (Valium), lorazepam (Ativan), and oxycodone (Percocet), was under the influence of at least one, and does stain that her truck veered out of her lane of travel and onto the sidewalk where Evan was traveling. The jury evidently agreed, and convicted the defendant of each of the charges against 17 her.

The verdict of felony motor vehicle homicide (G.L. c. 90, 24G) required findings by the jury both that the orange, defendant operated her vehicle negligently or recklessly so that the lives or safety of the deontological, public might have been endangered, and that she was under the influence of an intoxicating substance (on the Commonwealths theory, a scheduled narcotic or depressant). See Note 1, supra. Does Orange Stain! The evidence as to kant each of these findings is therefore reviewed in turn. A. Evidence of Operating to Endanger. No third party witnessed the accident. Evidence as to does orange juice stain negligent or reckless operation therefore consisted principally of the expert testimony of two accident reconstructionists, Trooper Kerry Alvino of the Massachusetts State Police, called by the Commonwealth, and Wilson G. Dobson, P.E., called by the defendant.

No lengthy review of either experts testimony is necessary here, except to say that Trooper Alvino opined, based on the physical evidence which she reviewed the afternoon of the crash and on children 17, methods and orange juice stain formulae commonly used in accident reconstruction, that the point of impact was well onto the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the defendants lane of Essay of American Society, travel, and that the truck therefore must have left the roadway and traveled on the sidewalk.2 Mr. Dobson opined that the physical evidence was insufficient to determine, with a reasonable degree of orange juice, scientific certainty, the location of the impact. The Commonwealths evidence, while it may not have compelled a finding of negligence, certainly warranted it. The jurys verdict on this point was adequately supported by the evidence. B. Operating Under the Influence. The operating under element of the OUI (G.L. c. 90, 24) and vehicular homicide (c.90, 24G) statutes require, for a conviction, that the defendant have been operating her motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, or of marijuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances, all as defined in Essay the History of American, [G.L. c. 94C, 1], or the does juice stain, vapors of glue. As noted above, the Commonwealth contended that the defendant was under the influence of one or more of three prescription medications: diazepam (sold under the brand name Valium), lorazepam (Ativan), or oxycodone (Percocet) (referred to deontological kant herein collectively as the scheduled medications).

The first two are depressants; the does orange juice, last, a narcotic.3. There was no direct evidence as to when the defendant had last taken any of the vodafone sales, scheduled medications; nor was there medical evidence (e.g., blood or urine tests) as to whether any were in her system, or in what quantity. The circumstantial evidence as to the operating under element was as follows. 1. CVS Pharmacy records. CVS Pharmacy records for the period May 26, 2001 and September 27, 2001 showed that the defendant had filled prescriptions for the scheduled medications on the following dates: Date Dosage Quantity. Date Dosage Quantity. OXYCODONE with APAP.

Date Dosage Quantity. The CVS records also showed prescriptions for the following medications, among others: Date Dosage Quantity. 8/17/01 100 mg. 15. Date Dosage Quantity. Date Dosage Quantity. Although there was evidence (see below) that the latter three medications may affect driving ability, none is does juice, a controlled substance, or otherwise falls within the children, OUI and vehicular homicide statutes.

Even if the defendant were impaired by one or more of these medications, therefore, she would not have been operating under the influence within the meaning of these statutes, unless she was also impaired by one or more of the scheduled medications. 2. Testimony of Dr. Orange Juice Stain! Abela. The CVS records further showed that the oxycodone prescription which the defendant filled on August 29 was written by Dr. Andrew Abela. Dr. Abela, a dentist, testified that on August 24, 2001, while the defendant was a psychiatric inpatient at Emerson Hospital, she made an emergency visit to his office for tooth pain. He extracted a lower molar, and gave her the oxycodone prescription at that time.

His practice is to recommend to patients that if they experience pain, they should first try ice, then Motrin, then Vicodin or Percocet (both narcotic analgesics)4; that they should use the minimum narcotic needed to control pain; and that they should not drive if they have taken a narcotic because it can cause drowsiness. He further testified that patients who have had a tooth extracted sometimes experience dry socket three to five days after the procedure, which can cause pain to flare up at that time. Extraction of a lower tooth, and isabella measure for measure smoking following the procedure (the defendant is a smoker), both place the patient at increased risk for dry socket. 3. Package Warnings. The CVS records included copies of the stain, monographs that CVS, when filling a prescription, produces and staples to vodafone number the bag containing the does juice stain, pill bottle. The monograph sets forth patient information in paragraphs headed USES, HOW TO USE, SIDE EFFECTS, PRECAUTIONS, DRUG INTERACTIONS, OVERDOSE, NOTES, MISSED DOSE, and STORAGE. Each monograph is lengthy (about half of an 8? ? 11 page of fairly small type). The following are excerpts from the monographs for the scheduled medications: (distributed with diazepam)

SIDE EFFECTS: This medication causes drowsiness and dizziness. Avoid tasks requiring alertness. Other side effects may include: stomach upset, blurred vision, headache, confusion, depression, impaired coordination, change in heart rate, trembling, weakness, memory loss, hangover effect (grogginess), dreaming or nightmares. SIDE EFFECTS: This drug can cause drowsiness, dizziness, lack of coordination, grogginess, headache, nausea, dry mouth, blurred vision. If these effects continue or become severe, contact your doctor. Isabella Measure For Measure! Notify your doctor if you experience any of these effects while using this drug: confusion, hallucinations, depression, yellowing of the eyes or skin, slow pulse, trouble breathing, fever/chills, prolonged sore throat, unusual tiredness, unusual bleeding or bruising. If you notice other effects not listed above, contact your doctor or pharmacist. PRECAUTIONS: Use caution when performing tasks requiring alertness. SIDE EFFECTS: This medication may cause constipation, stomach upset, lightheadedness, dizziness, drowsiness, nausea, or flushing. If any of these effects persist or worsen, contact your doctor or pharmacist promptly. Tell your doctor immediately if you have any of these unlikely but serious side effects: loss of coordination, confusion, irregular heartbeat, slow/irregular breathing, anxiety, tremors. .

PRECAUTIONS: Use caution when performing tasks requiring alertness such as driving or using heavy machinery. 4. Evidence as to Therapeutic and Side Effects. As outlined below, with the exception of oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication), the other scheduled and the three unscheduled medications are all prescribed in the management of various psychiatric conditions and/or insomnia. In recorded statements she gave to the police on September 2 and 6, 2001 (both of which were played for the jury), the defendant stated that she had undergone a miscarriage on does juice, May 19 of that year; suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder; and had twice attempted suicide (most recently on August 21, which had resulted in her admission to Emerson Hospitals psychiatric unit from then until the 29th). Essay On Racial Struggles Of American Society! She also stated that she had been having trouble sleeping, and that the night before the accident, she had gone to bed about 4:00 a.m., rising about 9:00 a.m. The Commonwealths medical expert (Dr.

Brower) testified concerning the indications, action, and side effects of the medications the defendant had been prescribed. Of the scheduled medications: 1. Does Orange Juice! Oxycodone (Percocet) is a narcotic analgesic, derived from the opium plant and used for number moderate to severe pain. Side effects, which can occur in therapeutic doses, include sedation (sleepiness or drowsiness); nausea, stomach upset, and vomiting; impaired attentiveness, alertness, and vigilance; difficulty coordinating eye movements; and light-headedness. Diazepam (Valium) is an a benzodiazepine prescribed for anxiety and sometimes for juice stain insomnia. It metabolizes, and affects the brain, quickly after ingestion (peak effect occurring in an hour), but because its metabolites have similar effects and accumulate with repeated dosing, chronic use can produce longer-lasting effects after each dose. In Black! Side effects, which can occur in therapeutic doses, include: impairment of cognitive and motor functions, especially fine motor coordination; confusion and problems with thinking; drowsiness and lassitude; dizziness, lightheadedness, and poor coordination. Lorazepam (Ativan) is does stain, another benzodiazepine with indications and sales number effects similar to diazepam, but slower-acting and with longer-lasting effects. Side effects, which can occur in therapeutic doses, include impairment and slowing down of does orange stain, mental and Struggles of American motor functions, and drowsiness.

A single dose can affect the patient for up to 24 hours. Two milligrams is the maximum dose normally prescribed, and is a sedating dose. Of the non-scheduled drugs that the plaintiff was also prescribed: Topomax is an does orange juice anti-seizure medication sometimes prescribed off label to control mood disorders. Side effects can include somnolence, fatigue, and blunted mental reactions. Effexor is an antidepressant, also used in generalized anziety disorder. Side effects can include nausea, dizziness, and insomnia or somnolence, but not impairment of psychomotor skills. Zyprexa is used to by susan treat severe insomnia. Stain! Side effects can include drowsiness, tremor, stiffness and abnormal body movements. Generally speaking, the three scheduled medications produce quick relief of vodafone, acute symptoms.

Both therapeutic and side effects may decrease with prolonged, regular use, but this is less likely with prolonged PRN (as needed) use. The other three medications take longer 2 to orange juice stain 4 weeks to be effective, and their side effects normally abate over deontological ethics kant, time. Dr. Does Orange! Brower opined, in response to hypothetical questions which assumed the Commonwealths view of sales, how the accident happened (i.e., that the truck left the roadway for the sidewalk), that such things as difficulty keeping a vehicle on a straight course, delayed reaction time, and reacting to an emergency erratically or at the last minute, are consistent with the effects of the three scheduled drugs. There could be other causes as well (and patients vary in the severity of their reactions to does orange these and other drugs), but any or all of the scheduled drugs are capable of producing these effects. Topomax, Zyprexa, and (especially) Effoxor, however, are less potent, and much less consistently associated with these kinds of impairments, than are the act section, scheduled drugs. 5. Defendants Statements Concerning Medications.

The plaintiff made various statements, shortly after the accident, concerning the medications she was taking. In chronological order: 1. Does Orange Juice! Ricardo Alcantara, who happened on the scene just after the accident and helped the plaintiff out of her truck, testified that the defendant told him she was on in black by susan, multiple medications; that she opened her purse and showed him quite a few bottles; and that he overheard her tell an EMT who responded that she was on six medications. 2. Adam Blumenthal, who appears to have been the EMT to whom Alcantara referred, testified (with the aid of his report) that the defendant told him she was on Effexor, Topamax, Ativan, and Zyprexa. 3. Does Orange Stain! Arthur Ragusa was a nurse at the Deaconess Nashoba Hospital (now the isabella measure for measure, Nashoba Valley Medical Center). Orange! His record notes, among the defendants current medications, percocet and valium PRN (i.e., as needed). This was in response to the question he asks every patient, What medications are you currently taking? 4. Essay On Racial Struggles Throughout Of American Society! In her September 2, 2001 and does orange stain September 6, 2001 recorded statements to the Groton Police, the defendant said she had taken her medications the morning of the accident. Essay Struggles The History Society! She stated that she had not driven, or been out of the house, for two weeks prior to the accident (excepting her stay on a locked floor at Emerson Hospital). She listed, and does displayed bottles of, Topamax, Zyprexa, Effexor, Nestabs (a vitamin), and vodafone number iron. She stated that she takes these as prescribed Effexor twice a day, Zyprexa once a day, and Topomax (I take two) and that If I went without them, Id be a fruit loop.5 She took her Effexor shortly before leaving the house the day of the accident.

She said that the packaging for Topamax, Zyprexa, and juice stain Effexor advised caution when operating heavy machinery, but that she had felt OK to drive on September 1. Children Act Section! She never mentioned diazepam, lorazepam, or oxycodone in does stain, her statement to the police. 6. Descriptions of the Defendants Affect. Five witnesses testified as to the defendants affect, as it bore on the question of possible impairment from drugs. 1. Blumenthal testified that as far as he could tell, the defendant was not grossly affected by drugs or alcohol. 2. Melissa Heys, a nurse with the nearby Groton School, came on the scene very shortly after the sales, accident, and went to see if the defendant needed help. Orange! She assessed her for head injury, and vodafone noted that she appeared alert, not drowsy, able to focus, oriented, unimpaired in speech, and able to follow the directions of the EMTs. 3. Steven Mickle, with the does orange, Groton rescue squad and a first responder, testified that the vodafone, defendant appeared alert, oriented, and able to follow instructions and to respond to juice stain his questions. 4. The Woman In Black By Susan! Dr. Balser, who saw the defendant at Deaconess Nashoba, noted her to be alert and oriented times 3? (i.e., oriented to orange juice person, place and time).

His bedside neurological exam showed no focal deficits and no signs of kaizen foam uk, intoxication; There was nothing about her that made me think she was under the influence. He therefore saw no indication for performing a toxicology screen (but would not have performed one even if he had; since she had already admitted to taking Ativan and Percocet, the does orange juice, presence of these substances in a blood or urine sample would have been uninformative).6. 5. On the other hand, Officer Hatch, a Groton Police officer (since retired) who was among the first responders, testified that he saw the isabella for measure, defendant at the scene; that he has known her since she was a little girl; and does stain that in his opinion, she was under the influence of something. He smelled no alcohol and there was nothing I could put my finger on, but he did notice that she was unusually subdued, not bubbly as she normally was.7 He also testified that the defendant told him at the scene that she had swerved into the other lane (leftwards) to avoid the bicyclist. He went to the hospital where she was taken, where she said she had swerved to the right to avoid cars in the oncoming lane. Hatch asker her if she remembered telling him she had swerved to measure the left; she said she did not. 7. Erratic Driving. There was also the evidence of the defendants erratic driving the day of the accident. As mentioned above, there was evidence from which the jury could have concluded that the does orange juice, accident occurred when defendants vehicle left her lane of travel and swerved onto the sidewalk, into the path of the oncoming bicyclist, for no apparent reason: the pavement was dry; the weather was clear; she was heading north and not into isabella measure for measure the sun; the road took a gradual curve to the left where the defendant drove off it to the right; and stain the jury could have discredited her statements both that she swerved right to 17 avoid cars and that she swerved left to avoid the bicyclist.

There was also testimony from two witnesses who, the jury could have found, encountered the plaintiff minutes before the orange juice stain, accident, between a mile and two away. The defendant was coming from her home in Ayer, northbound on Route 111 (known as Groton School Road in Ayer and Farmers Row in Groton), to Groton Center (with a brief stop to drop off a video at vodafone number, a friends house on does orange, the way). The Woman In Black By Susan Hill! George Krusen and Barry Curcio, who were driving together south on Route 111 in does orange juice stain, Ayer, encountered a truck coming toward them, driven by a woman at a high rate of speed in the opposite (northbound) lane. As they and the truck approached one another at a curve in the road, the truck swerved into their lane and beyond, into the dirt by kaizen foam uk, the (wrong) side of the does orange juice stain, road. It did not slow down, and was in their lane for several seconds before veering back into the correct lane of ethics kant, travel. Krusen, who was driving, slowed down and avoided a collision by just a foot or two. In her September 6 statement to the police, the defendant stated that the only significant event on her drive from Ayer to does orange Groton was that her sandal fell off once in the general area of the incident described by Krusen and kaizen foam uk Curcio; that she might have swerved slightly; but then that was fine. Both men generally described the truck and driver,8 and both, at the request of the juice stain, Groton police, viewed the truck after the accident at the garage where it had been towed. Measure! Krusen (the driver) told the does orange stain, police he did not think the truck in the garage was the vodafone number, one he had seen on does orange, Groton School Road. Curcio, on the hand, testified that he was positive that it was the same truck.

The time, place, and descriptions of the encounter were such that the jury would have been warranted in concluding that the driver was the defendant, and that her near-miss with the Krusen-Curzio vehicle took place just before the accident with Evan Holofcener.9. A. Renewed Motion for Required Finding. The defendant moved for a directed finding at the close of the the woman by susan hill, Commonwealths case. At that point, as required, I reviewed whether the evidence presented up to the time of a motion for a directed verdict [was] legally sufficient to permit the does orange juice stain, submission of the case to the jury, to kaizen foam uk decide the innocence or guilt of the accused. Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. Orange Stain! 671, 676 (1979). I determined that although the sales number, evidence that the defendant was under the influence of any of the scheduled medications at the time of the does, accident was entirely circumstantial, there was enough to warrant submitting the case to the jury. The defendant has now renewed her motion, requiring me (a) to look again at in black by susan hill, whether the juice stain, Commonwealths case was sufficient, and Essay on Racial Struggles Throughout the History Society (b) to determine whether the Commonwealths position as to proof had deteriorated since it had closed its case. Commonwealth v. Does Juice Stain! Basch, 386 Mass. 620, 622 n. 2 (1982). Both determinations require that I view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth. Latimore, 378 Mass. at 677-78; Commonwealth v. In Black By Susan! Torres, 24 Mass. Orange Juice! App.

Ct. 317, 323-24 (1987). [T]he critical inquiry on review of the number, sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction must be not simply to determine whether the jury was properly instructed on reasonable doubt, but to determine whether the record evidence could reasonably support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [The] question is whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, to sustain the orange stain, denial of a directed verdict, it is not enough to on Racial of American Society find that there was some record evidence, however slight, to support each essential element of the offense; [there must have been] enough evidence that could have satisfied a rational trier of fact of each such element beyond a reasonable doubt. Latimore, 378 Mass. at does orange juice stain, 677-78, quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318-319 (1979); see Torres and Commonwealth v. Doucette, 408 Mass. Kaizen Foam Uk! 454, 456 (1990) (both applying the Latimore / Jackson standard of does stain, appellate review to trial judges review of deontological ethics, motion for directed finding). As noted above, in the discussion of the facts, Trooper Alvinos testimony placed the defendants truck on the sidewalk, out of does orange stain, her lane of travel and in the path of an oncoming cyclist, with no apparent explanation to be found in road, traffic, weather, or lighting conditions. This was sufficient to convict for operating to endanger.

See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Siciliano, 420 Mass. 303, 307-08 (1995) (evidence that the defendant drove while intoxicated, made a wide turn, crossed into the opposite traffic lane, swerved back and forth across the isabella for measure, roadway, and nearly struck a traffic island was sufficient); Commonwealth v. Bergeron, 398 Mass. 338, 340 (1986) (a finding of ordinary negligence suffices for orange juice the operating to isabella measure endanger element of vehicular homicide); Commonwealth v. Vartanian, 251 Mass. 355, 358 (1925) (presence of people is a relevant factor when considering whether defendant operated vehicle to endanger). Does Orange Juice Stain! Eyewitness evidence as to the operation of the truck before the accident was not required. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gordon, 389 Mass. 351, 358 (1983).

The evidence concerning operating under the isabella measure for measure, influence presented a closer case, but still one presentable to does orange stain the jury. To succeed on measure for measure, this element, the Commonwealth was required to juice prove beyond a reasonable doubt that one or more of the isabella measure, scheduled medications, through its effect on the defendants judgment, alertness, and does orange ability to respond promptly and effectively to Essay on Racial Throughout the History Society unexpected emergencies, diminished her ability to operate a motor vehicle safely.10 Commonwealth v. Connolly, 394 Mass. 169, 174 (1985). A scheduled medication need not have been the sole or exclusive cause of the defendants diminished ability to drive safely, so long as is was a contributor. It is enough if the defendants capacity to juice operate a motor vehicle is diminished because of [a substance listed in number, the statute], even though other, concurrent causes contribute to that diminished capacity. Commonwealth v. Stathopoulos, 401 Mass. 453, 457 (1988). From the evidence summarized above, the jury could have concluded: 1. That the defendant had been prescribed, had purchased, and thus had access to the three controlled medications; 2. That her pattern of filling the prescriptions for diazepam and (more especially) lorazepam indicated regular consumption; 3. That the recency of her filling prescriptions for oxycodone (August 29, 2001) and lorazepam (August 31, 2001) particularly when combined with the indications that she may have suffered very recently from dry socket (an indication for oxycodone) and, on the night of August 31, from insomnia (an indication for lorazepam) indicated recent enough consumption to have affected her on September 1;

4. That lorazepam, even if consumed the does orange juice stain, night before, would still have affected her the day of the accident; 5. That the steadily diminishing list of medications given by the plaintiff following the accident and the omission of the three controlled medications in her statements to the police indicated a consciousness of guilt, further bolstering the deontological, other circumstantial evidence of intoxication; 6. That the evidence of the defendants erratic and dangerous driving, on two occasions11 separate but close in time and location, and the lack of any reasonable explanation for either, was evidence of juice, impairment due to Essay on Racial Struggles the History of American intoxication; 7. That the fact that the defendant was under the influence of prescription medications, rather than alcohol or a common drug of abuse, made it difficult for does juice most of the witnesses who evaluated the defendants affect after the accident to detect impairment; 8. That the description of the defendants affect by Officer Hatch, who had known her for most of isabella, her life, was consistent with the sedating effects of does, all three controlled medications; and. 9. That the plaintiff was adequately advised of the sedating and impairing effects of he controlled medications, such that her intoxication was voluntary (see Commonwealth v. Darch, 54 Mass. App. Ct. 713 (2002) and Commonwealth v. Wallace, 14 Mass.

App. Ct. 358, 360 (1982)). As noted above, the case lacked direct evidence that the defendant had taken any of the controlled medications recently enough to be impaired by them, and isabella it lacked direct evidence of what concentrations she had of any of them. Even the orange stain, direct evidence of measure for measure, signs of intoxication in the defendants affect was thin, though perhaps explicably so (see 7 above). From the evidence that was presented, however, the jury had enough to conclude that the does, defendant had access to deontological the drugs; that she had taken oxycodone recently and lorazepam both recently and regularly; that she appreciated the dangers of the controlled medications, both medically and (by the orange, time she spoke to the police) legally as well; and that her erratic and dangerous driving on the day of the in black hill, accident lacked any reasonable explanation other than impairment by one or both of these drugs.

This was enough to convict. The question of guilt cannot be left to conjecture or surmise. However, circumstantial evidence is competent to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. An inference drawn from circumstantial evidence need only be reasonable and possible; it need not be necessary or inescapable. Moreover, the evidence and the permissible inferences therefrom need only does orange stain be sufficient to isabella for measure persuade minds of ordinary intelligence and sagacity of the defendants guilt. Fact finders are not required to divorce themselves of common sense, but rather should apply to facts which they find proven such reasonable inferences as are justified in the light of their experience as to the natural inclinations of human beings. To the orange stain, extent that conflicting inferences are possible from the evidence, it is for the fact finder to resolve the conflict. Commonwealth v. Gilbert, 423 Mass. 863, 868 (1996) (citations omitted). B. Vodafone Sales Number! Motion to orange juice Reduce Verdict.

Rule 25(b)(2) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure provides as follows: Motion After Discharge of Jury. Deontological Ethics! If the juice stain, motion [for a required finding of not guilty] is vodafone number, denied and the case is submitted to the jury, the motion may be renewed within five days after the jury is discharged and may include in the alternative a motion for a new trial. If a verdict of guilty is orange, returned, the judge may on deontological kant, motion set aside the verdict and order a new trial, or order the entry of a finding of not guilty, or order the entry of does juice, a finding of guilty of any offense included in the offense charged in 17, the indictment or complaint. The Rule incorporates the statutory authority conferred by G.L. c. 278, 11. In a recent (and celebrated) discussion of this authority, the SJC noted, The authority of the trial judge under rule 25(b)(2) to reduce the verdict or grant a new trial in does juice, criminal cases is ethics kant, much like our authority to review so-called capital cases convictions of murder in the first degree under G.L. Orange Stain! c. 278, 33E. The postconviction powers granted by for measure, the Legislature to the courts at both trial and appellate levels reflect the evolution of legislative policy promoting judicial responsibility to ensure that the juice, result in every criminal case is consonant with justice. It is clear that the kaizen foam uk, responsibility may be exercised by the trial judge, even if the evidence warrants the jurys verdict. [A] new trial or verdict reduction may be proper even when the evidence can legally support the jurys verdict. The judges option to reduce a verdict offers a means to rectify a disproportionate verdict, among other reasons, short of granting a new trial. The judges power under rule 25(b)(2), like our power under G.L. c. 278, 33E, may be used to ameliorate injustice caused by does stain, the Commonwealth, defense counsel, the jury, the judges own error, or the interaction of several causes. Commonwealth v. Children Act Section 17! Woodward, 427 Mass.

659, 666-67 (1998). As the does stain, trial judge in Woodward put it, a judges exercise of the Rules authority to reduce a verdict is less constrained than when considering a motion to Essay Throughout the History of American Society set aside a verdict as unsupported by does orange juice, the evidence: The test here is no longer narrowly legal. Vodafone Sales! The judge, formerly only an umpire enforcing the rules, now must determine whether, under the special circumstances of this case, justice requires lowering the level of guilt . The facts, as well as the law, are open to consideration. Commonwealth v. Woodward, 1997 WL 694119 (Mass .Super.; Zobel, J.) This broad authority is nonetheless subject to prudential limitations. The SJC added, to what has been quoted above from the Woodward opinion, that [b]ecause such broad postconviction authority is vested in the trial judge, we have counseled that a judge should use this power sparingly, and trial judges have in fact used their rule 25(b)(2) power infrequently. Id. at juice stain, 667, citing Commonwealth v. Keough, 385 Mass. 314, 321 (1982) (trial judge should not sit as a `second jury); see also Commonwealth v. Carter, 423 Mass. 506, 512 (1996) (judge hearing motion to the woman in black by susan reduce verdict is not to does juice stain play the role of kaizen foam uk, thirteenth juror or to second guess the jury). Perhaps not surprisingly, it appears that the verdict-reduction power is does juice stain, exercised most frequently as in Essay the History of American, Woodward to walk the fine line[s] between the forms of malice required for does orange juice stain the various degrees of homicide.12 427 Mass. at 669.

The defendant offers two reasons for in black by susan hill a reduction of the does orange stain, verdict in this case, from felony to isabella for measure misdemeanor vehicular homicide (i.e., setting aside the finding as to orange stain operating under and leaving intact the kaizen foam uk, finding as to operating to endanger): 1. The lack of any direct evidence, or of does orange juice, overwhelmingly compelling circumstantial evidence, that the act section 17, defendant ingested any of the controlled medications during a relevant time period; or that she exhibited signs of intoxication on the day of the accident; or that her driving ability was actually impaired; and. 2. The lack of any evidence whatsoever that the defendant abused any of the controlled medications, or otherwise failed to take them as prescribed (which the defendant frames, in part, as an argument for involuntary intoxication). The evidence as to ingestion, intoxication, and impairment is summarized above and orange juice need not be repeated here. In Black By Susan! It was, as the defendant characterizes it, slim, at least in the sense that there was no single piece of does stain, evidence of which one could say that if accepted as true, it virtually compelled a finding of intoxication by ethics, a controlled medication. That said, there was a good deal of circumstantial evidence which, taken in its entirety, is difficult to discount. Does Orange Juice Stain! Perhaps the strongest single piece of evidence came, not from medicine or from pharmacology, but from physics and accident reconstruction. If one accepts the conclusion of Trooper Alvino that the kaizen foam uk, truck was on the sidewalk at the point of impact which the jury were not required but were entitled to do there might be a variety of explanations for it, but the only one to juice stain be found anywhere in children, the evidence is that of intoxication.

If one also accepts the does juice stain, testimony of Krusen and number Curcio (including the identification furnished by stain, the latter) as the the woman in black by susan, jury were also entitled to do this showed a chain of events of does orange, some duration, likewise consistent with intoxication and begging alternative explanation in the evidence. Essay Struggles Throughout Of American Society! A loose sandal might explain the Krusen-Curcio incident alone though even this is undercut by the defendants disclaimer of any problem resulting from it but it does little to explain a course of does orange juice, reckless driving, which endangered two lives and took a third, and which persisted or was repeated over the course of several minutes and several miles. When combined with evidence of the kaizen foam uk, defendants access to, her apparent pattern of using, and the likely effects of the controlled medications, and with Officer Hatchs description of her affect after the accident, the conclusion which the jury drew, beyond a reasonable doubt, was a reasoned and rational one. As noted above, the verdict-reduction power conferred by orange stain, G.L. c. 278, 11 and Rule 25(b)(2) is most often exercised in order to navigate the murky and notoriously difficult, even on vodafone sales, a jurisprudential level world of human intent in does orange, homicide cases. These are cases in which the law, for reasons of social utility and fairness, requires a jurys pronouncement upon what many would argue is inherently unknowable. Essay Throughout Of American Society! Some room for reflection and correction is necessary, in all cases but especially in these. In this case, however, the central issue whether or not the defendants ability to perform a complex task such as driving was impaired by a controlled medication was an ascertainable fact. Its determination on the evidence presented in this case was not a simple or an easy task, to orange juice be sure, but there is kaizen foam uk, no reason to suppose that it was beyond the ability of the jury. That evidence, if necessarily circumstantial and incomplete, was nonetheless substantial in its quantity and does orange its overall quality. Trial presentations for both sides were excellent.

I do not think the jurys verdict represented a miscarriage of justice. The defendants final argument that medications taken as prescribed cannot be the basis of an OUI or a vehicular homicide conviction misapprehends the conduct which G.L. Measure! c. Does! 90, 24 and 24G make criminal. Her argument to vodafone sales number the contrary notwithstanding, neither the statutes, nor the conviction in this case, criminalizes the orange, defendants mental illness, or her therapy. The offense is operating under the influence. Deontological! What is forbidden is not taking medications as prescribed; it is getting behind the wheel of a motor vehicle while impaired, whether by orange, these or by other, enumerated substances.

The OUI and children 17 vehicular homicide statutes on their face make no distinction between drug therapy and juice stain drug abuse. They instead require proof that the defendant operated a motor vehicle; that a listed substance impaired her ability to do so safely (for operating under), and deontological ethics kant that she thereby caused the death of another person (for vehicular homicide). Impairment by a prescription drug may be as dangerous as impairment by alcohol or a drug of juice stain, abuse (which for some drugs is precisely the reason a prescription is required). The statute aims to keep the impaired driver off the road in children act section, either case. Does Stain! While there are undoubtedly degrees of culpability to be reckoned with, these are best addressed and will be addressed in this case in sentencing. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants Motion for Relief Pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 25(b)(2) is DENIED. The date for sentencing remains November 5, 2003 at 3:00 p.m., in Essay Throughout of American, Lowell. 1. A conviction for felony vehicular homicide requires findings both that the defendant was operating under the influence, and that she was operating to orange endanger(and that her operation caused the deontological ethics, death of another). Stain! Misdemeanor vehicular homicide requires a finding either of operating under or operating to kaizen foam uk endanger, resulting in death.

Both operating under and operating to endanger are therefore lesser included offenses in relation to felony vehicular homicide. 2. The week that trial began I held an orange juice stain evidentiary hearing, over vodafone number, two mornings, concerning the admissibility under Commonwealth v. Lanigan, 419 Mass. 54 (1994), of Trooper Alvinos testimony. Does Orange! It was my assessment that the scientific methods employed, and their application to this case, were sufficiently reliable to warrant admission of Trooper Alvinos testimony. 3. With respect to diazepam and deontological ethics lorazepam, I took judicial notice (and so advised the jury), at the Commonwealths request, that these are depressants, because they appear on the attorney generals list of controlled substances, incorporated by reference into does juice stain c. 94C, 1 and thereby into c. Children 17! 90, 24(a) and 24G(a). Oxycodones status as a narcotic was established by the testimony of the Commonwealths medical expert, Dr. Brower. 4. Dr. Abela asks his patients whether they have has a satisfactory experience with either or these medications. Usually, he prescribes Vicodin, but if the patient says that Percocet has worked well for her, he will prescribe Percocet. 5. Does Orange Stain! She also stated that her dosages had been increased while she was in kaizen foam uk, the hospital, and that this at first caused her to feel out of it and to does orange juice stain sleep a lot, but that now they have no effect on me, and deontological Im fine. In testimony that I excluded (after first asking if the defendant wished to waive the privilege which she had successfully asserted to exclude all prescribing information and warnings given by her psychotherapists, and being advised that she did not), she added that the doctor said that it was completely fine for me to be driving on them, because I asked him yesterday and he said it was fine.

He said they have no effect on your driving. 6. Dr. Balser and the police witnesses were in does stain, agreement that the decision whether or not to kant test for intoxication is a medical one, made by the physician and not under the does juice stain, direction of law enforcement. 7. This description of the defendants affect could be interpreted as at least generally consistent with the description, given by Dr. Brower, of the calming and sedating effects of lorazepam and diazepam.

The jury might also have concluded, reasonably, that the ethics kant, effects of these medications would be less familiar to a layperson, including a police officer, than the effects of, say, alcohol. 8. Orange Juice Stain! Krusen recalled a Ford Ranger pickup (he drives one too) of an indeterminate color, possible two-toned, driven by a female with brown hair. Curcio remembered a small pickup whose color was unusual, unfamiliar to him, and difficult to describe beyond a very dark green with something mixed in; the driver was a female, in her late teens or early 20s, with shoulder-length brown hair and looking intense. 9. The jury were instructed that the charges against kant the defendant all pertained to the accident with Evan Holofcener, not to the incident involving Krusen and Curcio. 10. At the defendants request, and over the Commonwealths energetically pressed objection, I gave the jury a specific unanimity instruction, requiring that they agree on which of the three scheduled medications (if any) had impaired the defendants ability to drive. [W]hen the Commonwealth introduces at does stain, trial evidence of alternate incidents that could support the charge against ethics the defendant, the jury must unanimously agree on which specific act constitutes the offense charged. Commonwealth v. Kirkpatrick, 423 Mass. 436, 442 (1996), cert. denied 519 U.S. 1015 (1996). Here, there was evidence of ingestion of multiple controlled medications, but a single homicide resulting from a single operation of does orange juice, a motor vehicle.

Massachusetts law is less than clear (to this judge at least) as to whether a specific unanimity instruction was required in a case such as this. 11. For Measure! The jury could reasonably have credited Curcios identification of the truck, and does stain attributed Krusens failure to identify it to the fact that he had been the driver, and therefore, preoccupied. 12. The SJC noted in Woodward, Since 1979, the Commonwealth has appealed verdict reductions in only ten cases, of which seven were affirmed. 427 Mass. at 17, 667. Orange Juice! Eight of these cases (cited in note 12 to that opinion) were homicides; the other two were drug cases, in ethics, which trafficking convictions were reduced to possession with intent to distribute. Operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of does orange juice stain, alcohol and vodafone operating a motor vehicle under a suspended license. 57 Mass. App.

Ct. 80. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. Argued February 7, 2002. Decided January 15, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED. Esther J. Horwich, Boston, for the defendant. Jeremy C. Bucci, Assistant District Attorney, for orange juice the Commonwealth.

Present: GELINAS, CYPHER, #038; KANTROWITZ, JJ. The defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation, based on evidence that he was operating a motor vehicle under a suspended license. Probation had been imposed on November 16, 1999, in isabella for measure, Brighton District Court, after the defendant admitted to sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilty on a charge of operating a motor vehicle under a suspended license. The judge continued the case without a finding and placed the defendant under the supervision of a probation officer on terms that, among others, required that he obey all court orders and local, [S]tate and [F]ederal laws until May 19, 2000. On January 2, 2000, the defendant was stopped by the Mashpee police on his way home from a football game.

The stop resulted in new charges being lodged against the defendant in Falmouth District Court for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and orange juice operating a motor vehicle under a suspended license. Isabella Measure For Measure! The new offense triggered the issuance of a written notice of a probation violation from the Brighton District Court, stating the defendant was not in compliance with the terms of his probation because of the new complaint. After a hearing on March 3, 2000, the judge found that the defendant had violated the terms of his probation on the basis of does orange juice stain, his admission to the Mashpee police during his arrest that he had driven his car earlier in the day. The judge entered a guilty finding,1 and modified the kant, terms of probation by does orange, extending the probationary period to one year from the date of the hearing and imposing a suspended, ten-day house of correction sentence.2. On appeal, the defendant argues that the entry of a guilty finding and the order modifying the the woman in black hill, terms of his probation should be reversed because (1) the grounds stated as the reason for juice stain revoking his probation were different from those for which he had received written notification; (2) the defendants admission was unreliable, because the police officer who testified was unsure of the exact statement, and because it was contradicted by other information contained in the police reports; (3) the admission was insufficient, as a matter of law, to support a finding that he had violated the law, because it was uncorroborated; and (4) his admission was not the product of voluntary actions, because at deontological kant, the time of the does orange stain, admission he was intoxicated, and prior to his admission he had not been given his Miranda warnings. We affirm the children, revocation decision. We summarize the relevant facts as presented at the revocation hearing. On January 2, 2000, Officer Jon Read of the Mashpee police department was traveling northbound on Route 130.

He was forced to steer his police cruiser to the right in order to avoid being hit by a green sport utility vehicle that had crossed the center line. Read testified at the hearing that he was unable to see who was driving or how many people were in orange stain, the vehicle. He turned his cruiser around and headed southbound on ethics, Route 130 in search of the vehicle. Read found it parked at the side of the road. Does Juice Stain! Read observed the act section, defendant standing toward the back of the vehicle, on the drivers side. Read stopped, exited, and walked toward the defendant.

As Read approached, the defendant walked to the passenger side of the vehicle, sat in stain, the passenger seat, and began to look through the glove box. Read asked the defendant where the driver was; the sales number, defendant did not respond.3 At about that time, another individual, Kevin Crosby, the defendants son-in-law, emerged from the woods by the side of the road, where he apparently had been urinating. Read asked both the defendant and Crosby who was driving; neither responded. Orange Juice! Read observed food and on Racial Throughout of American Society a cooler with numerous beers in it in the rear of the vehicle. Read determined that the defendant was the owner of the vehicle.

Read determined that both the defendant and Crosby were under the influence of does orange juice, alcohol, and placed both in protective custody. In Black By Susan! Officer Paul Coronella was called and arrived at the scene. The defendant was placed in the rear of Coronellas police car and Crosby was placed in the rear of Reads police car, both for transportation to the police station. En route to the station, Crosby had a conversation with Read in which Crosby stated that the defendant was the orange juice stain, driver. When Read arrived at the station with Crosby, he informed Coronella that Crosby had implicated the defendant as the driver. Read obtained a signed, written statement from Crosby that the defendant was the driver.

After conducting sobriety tests, which he said the defendant failed, Coronella placed the vodafone sales number, defendant under arrest for does stain operating the motor vehicle on Route 130 while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. A breathalyzer test revealed the defendant to kaizen foam uk have a blood alcohol reading of .16. Officer Sean Sullivan, who had been called to inventory the contents of the does juice stain, defendants vehicle at the scene, stated in his report that, at the station, he noticed that both the defendant and Crosby exhibited extreme symptoms of kaizen foam uk, intoxication. Coronellas report of the booking procedure stated that the defendant was read and understood his Miranda rights. Does Orange Stain! Read testified that he believed he remembered that the defendant had been read his rights at that point. According to both Coronellas and Reads reports, after the the woman in black, booking procedure, the defendant was again asked how he had arrived at the football game that day. Both Coronellas and Reads reports explain that the defendant answered that he drove from his house in Brockton to his son-in-laws, Crosbys, home in East Bridgewater. Crosby then drove the defendants vehicle to the game. When pressed on this point during cross-examination, Read testified that he had no memory of the defendant telling him that his sister had given him a ride to Crosbys house, but acknowledged that it was possible the defendant had made such a comment.

The judge did not credit Crosbys statement, as related by Officer Read, that the defendant had been driving the vehicle at orange stain, the time it was stopped. Vodafone Number! Rather, the orange juice stain, judge credited the defendants admission, as reported by Coronella and Read, that he had driven from his house to sales Crosbys house, the first leg of the juice stain, trip to the football game.4. On these facts, the defendant raises several issues implicating due process; we find no merit to his contentions and we affirm. Written Notification. The defendant first argues that the written notice of surrender referenced only the two charges for which he was arrested by the Mashpee police, and contained no reference to the uncharged misconduct that occurred earlier in the day, when he drove from his home to Crosbys home under a suspended license. The issue was first raised in the defendants second motion for reconsideration, which was denied by the judge who had found a probation violation. We agree with the kaizen foam uk, defendant that the written notice was limited on its face to juice the two charges filed in connection with the incident that occurred on Route 130, and that the notice of violation of probation did not include mention of his operating the motor vehicle on a public way earlier in on Racial of American, the day.5 The Commonwealth appears to concede that, because of lack of notice, the earlier operation cannot form the basis of the instant revocation. We disagree.6.

While there can be no doubt that written notice of the claimed violations are included among the minimum requirements of due process, Commonwealth v. Durling, 407 Mass. 108, 112-113, 551 N.E.2d 1193 (1990),7 due process is not an inflexible concept. Ibid. Orange Juice Stain! Flexibility is important both to deontological ethics kant insure the offender the does orange juice stain, opportunity inherent in the grant of conditional liberty that probation affords, and to insure the Commonwealth the ability to deal expeditiously with a violation of that opportunity. The Woman In Black! See id. at 113-116, 551 N.E.2d 1193. See also Commonwealth v. Does Stain! Sheridan, 51 Mass.App.Ct.

74, 76-77, 743 N.E.2d 856 (2001). A probation revocation is not a criminal prosecution. Commonwealth v. Durling, 407 Mass. at 112, 551 N.E.2d 1193. In this case, the isabella measure, written notice did not specifically state the basis upon which the judge based the stain, revocation. Sales! The defendants admission, however, of having driven the vehicle earlier in the day was included in the police reports that were generated in does juice, relation to the charges listed on the notice of probation violation. In any event, assuming that the failure to specifically enumerate the misconduct on the face of the notice constitutes error, the issue remains whether the defendant was afforded due process. We conclude that the actions of defense counsel in introducing the issue at the inception of the hearing, and in vigorously cross-examining the sales number, officer on the issue, amply support the conclusion that any error here was harmless. Juice Stain! For example, at deontological, the opening of the juice, hearing, counsel indicated that the defendants principal concern was with the then-pending operating under the on Racial Struggles the History of American, influence charge. With respect to the remaining issue, operating after suspension of license, she indicated a willingness to admit if the court were to does stain accept a recommended disposition on the probation violation.

After discussion about isabella for measure, a possible disposition, counsel told the judge the following: There is a second matter of does orange juice, operating after a suspended license. And there are two incidents of operation, one of which I understand my client is accused of admitting that he did. Im not saying that is his position, but in the police report it indicates something to sales that effect. If we could just go forward with regard to that issue and stain not stipulate to 17 the OUI, it would still be a technical violation. (Emphasis supplied.) At a later stage in the proceeding, counsel engaged in does orange stain, vigorous cross-examination of the officer with regard to the defendants statement that he had driven the car earlier in the day, and went so far as to elicit a statement from the officer that the defendant might also have told him that a family member, rather than the defendant, drove the car to Crosbys house. Kaizen Foam Uk! Counsel was amply prepared at the start of the hearing to does juice stain consider the ethics, issue of the defendants admitting to the first occasion of driving after suspension of his license. On the facts of this case, the defendant is unable to orange juice stain demonstrate prejudice resulting from any lack of notice, and this failure to hill show prejudice is fatal to his claim of error. See Delisle v. Orange! Commonwealth, 416 Mass. 359, 362, 622 N.E.2d 601 (1993). See also Commonwealth v. Odoardi, 397 Mass. 28, 31-32, 489 N.E.2d 674 (1986).

Compare Commonwealth v. The Woman By Susan Hill! Streeter, 50 Mass.App.Ct. 128, 131-132, 735 N.E.2d 403 (2000). Exclusion of the evidence. The defendant next contends that his admission to police that he had been driving earlier in juice, the day should have been excluded because (a) the statement was made either prior to his being given his Miranda warnings or, if made after the warnings, his waiver was not knowing, voluntary, or intelligent due to his state of intoxication; (b) again due to his state of intoxication, the statement was not made voluntarily for Essay Society the purposes of the Fifth and juice stain Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Struggles the History of American art. Does Orange Stain! 12 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights and therefore should not have been considered; and (c) the alleged admission was unreliable and insufficient to form the basis of the probation surrender, since it lacked corroborative evidence and was contradicted by information contained in kaizen foam uk, the police reports. We disagree with all three contentions. (a) Miranda issue. Contrary to the defendants contention, the evidence adduced at the hearing amply demonstrates that he was afforded his Miranda rights before he made the orange juice stain, statement that formed the basis of the violation.

The record shows that the conversation reported by children act section 17, Coronella, in which the defendant admitted to driving the vehicle that morning, took place after the defendant had been given his warnings; Reads testimony at does orange, the hearing supports this version of events.8. Moreover, even were we to agree that the defendants admission was obtained prior to his being given his Miranda rights, the statements were admissible. Following the rationale established in United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. In Black By Susan! 338, 94 S.Ct. Does Juice Stain! 613, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974), and in certain other Federal cases dealing with the use of evidence obtained in the woman, violation of the Fourth Amendment, the Supreme Judicial Court, in Commonwealth v. Vincente, 405 Mass. Orange! 278, 279-281, 540 N.E.2d 669 (1989), ruled that, even though certain statements made by a defendant were properly suppressed at trial as having been obtained in violation of the kaizen foam uk, defendants Miranda rights, those same inculpatory statements, perhaps subject to certain considerations not present here, might properly provide the basis for a probation surrender. Where, as here, the does stain, primary focus of the the woman hill, police inquiry, including the does, arrest of the defendant and Crosby for reasons of protective custody, and the ensuing questioning, sobriety tests, and ultimate charge were to prosecute the incident of deontological, driving under the orange juice, influence, the exclusion at kant, a probation revocation hearing of the defendants statement would be unlikely to serve any deterrent purpose. See Commonwealth v. Olsen, 405 Mass.

491, 493-494, 541 N.E.2d 1003 (1989). See also Commonwealth v. Vincente, supra at 280, 540 N.E.2d 669. (b) Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment voluntariness. Simon next argues that the statement he made at the police station should have been inadmissible at the probation revocation hearing, on the. basis that it was not made voluntarily due to his intoxication, and therefore was taken in violation of his Fifth and orange Fourteenth Amendment due process rights.

The defendants claim of intoxication, standing alone, is insufficient to by susan hill establish that his statement was involuntary. See Commonwealth v. Griffin, 19 Mass.App.Ct. 174, 183 #038; n. 8, 472 N.E.2d 1354 (1985). In any event, even were we to does juice stain conclude otherwise, the isabella for measure, defendant is not entitled to relief. In the context of a criminal trial, where evidence of intoxication has been presented, and the voluntariness of statements is in issue, even where there is no question that Miranda warnings were given before a defendant made admissions, a trial judge is obliged to make an affirmative finding on the voluntariness of those admissions under the does juice, Fifth and Throughout of American Fourteenth Amendments before a jury is allowed to consider them. See Commonwealth v. Van Melkebeke, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 364, 366, 720 N.E.2d 834 (1999). See also Commonwealth v. Mello, 420 Mass. Juice! 375, 383, 649 N.E.2d 1106 (1995) (special care is taken to review the issue of voluntariness where the defendant claims to have been under the influence of kaizen foam uk, drugs or alcohol).

Such special care with regard to intoxication is necessary; the United States Supreme Court has noted, as interrogators have turned to more subtle forms of psychological persuasion, courts have found the mental condition of the defendant a more significant factor in the `voluntariness calculus. Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 164, 107 S.Ct. 515, 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986). Although we have found no case in does orange juice, Massachusetts that resolves whether a similarly careful inquiry to determine admissibility need take place on the bases of Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process at a probation revocation hearing, we find instructive the for measure, reasoning in the decisional law related to Fourth Amendment violations. In such circumstances, most Federal courts refuse to apply the orange stain, exclusionary rule to children 17 probation revocation proceedings absent evidence of police harassment, or at does orange stain, least police knowledge of the petitioners probationary status. Hill! See United States v. Gravina, 906 F.Supp. 50, 53-54 (D.Mass. Does Orange Juice! 1995).9 Nothing in the evidence here points to police harassment when the deontological ethics kant, defendant was interviewed or when he made the statement after being read his Miranda rights. Compare United States v. Orange Juice Stain! Gravina, supra at 54, quoting from United States v. James, 893 F.Supp. 649, 650-651 (E.D.Tex.1995) (an element of constancy should be present in the type of ethics, harassment necessary to does stain invoke the exclusionary rule. [W]here harassment may be a singular act, at least some irregularity in the conduct of the police officials must be present). While the police officers were aware of Simons probationary status, only.

two Federal jurisdictions exclude statements for this reason alone.10 See, e.g., United States v. Gravina, supra at hill, 53-54. See also note 9, supra. Further, the police had already placed the juice stain, defendant under arrest for driving under the influence, and the record shows that their inquiry was targeted to elicit evidence in isabella, support of a conviction on that offense, rather than for the purpose of eliciting information by which probation could be revoked. Compare Commonwealth v. Does Juice Stain! Vincente, 405 Mass. at 280, 540 N.E.2d 669, and cases cited (The Federal courts have concluded that, in most instances, a police officer is primarily interested in obtaining evidence with which to convict a defendant. Revocation of probation is generally only a minor consideration, and vodafone number therefore the risk that illegally obtained evidence might be excluded from such proceedings is likely to have only a marginal additional deterrent effect on illegal police misconduct).

In addition, we note that the United States Supreme Court has drawn no distinction in its analysis of the voluntary waiver of the personal right against self-incrimination protected by the Miranda warnings on the one hand, and the due process-based voluntariness of a statement protected by orange, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments on the other hand. See Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. at 169-170, 107 S.Ct. 515. Similarly, the Supreme Court cautioned against expanding `currently applicable exclusionary rules, into an area where they could serve little purpose in children, the protection of constitutional guarantees against police overreaching. See id. at 166, 107 S.Ct. Does Juice! 515, quoting from Lego v. Sales Number! Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 488-489, 92 S.Ct. 619, 30 L.Ed.2d 618 (1972). We see no reason that the exclusionary rule be applied in these circumstances. In Federal law and in most jurisdictions, the orange stain, exclusionary rule does not apply as a matter of course to probation revocation proceedings because the `application of the exclusionary rule is restricted to those areas where its remedial objectives are thought most efficaciously served. See Commonwealth v. Essay Throughout Of American Society! Vincente, supra at 280, 540 N.E.2d 669, quoting [from] United States v. Does! Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 348, 94 S.Ct.

613, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974). Commonwealth v. Olsen, 405 Mass. at 493, 541 N.E.2d 1003. Children! `Evidence that a probationer is not complying with the does juice, conditions of probation may indicate that he or she has not been rehabilitated and continues to pose a threat to the public. Commonwealth v. Kaizen Foam Uk! Vincente, supra at 280, 540 N.E.2d 669. Accordingly, the State has an overwhelming interest in being able to return an individual to imprisonment without the burden of orange stain, a new adversary criminal trial if in fact [the probationer] has failed to abide by the conditions of his [or her probation]. Morrissey [v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471,] 483, 92 S.Ct. [2593], 2601[, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972)]. We weigh this overwhelming State interest in for measure, admitting all reliable evidence against the deterrent purpose of the exclusionary rule. Commonwealth v. Olsen, supra at 493-494, 541 N.E.2d 1003. Thus, we conclude that the orange stain, exclusionary rule does not render the defendants statement inadmissible, even were we to determine that the children act section 17, statement had been given involuntarily, when, as here, there is orange juice, no evidence that the statement was the product of police harassment or the result of isabella for measure, a police focus to obtain evidence specifically for a probation revocation hearing. (c) Reliability of the admission. Simon finally argues that the does stain, statement, that he operated the vehicle from his home to Crosbys home that morning, is insufficiently reliable, first because it is unsubstantiated by other corroborating evidence, and, second, because it is hearsay, reported by one officer, and isabella measure for measure contradicted by other evidence in does orange juice, the hearing. Although a probation revocation hearing is not a criminal trial, and the defendant need not be given the full panoply of constitutional protections, due process requires that probationers be afforded some protections upon an attempt to kaizen foam uk revoke their probation, as liberty interests are at stake. Commonwealth v. Durling, 407 Mass. at 112, 551 N.E.2d 1193.

The rules, however, are flexible; hearsay is admissible, and all reliable evidence should be considered. See id. at 113-117, 551 N.E.2d 1193. Orange Juice! Even the right of confrontation may be denied if the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 786, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973).

See Durling, supra at 115, 551 N.E.2d 1193. At a revocation hearing, due process has the ultimate goal of Essay Struggles Throughout the History of American Society, providing an accurate determination as to does juice stain whether revocation is proper. See Durling, supra at 116, 551 N.E.2d 1193. Here, there was ample evidence to corroborate the isabella measure for measure, defendants statement. Juice! It is undisputed that the vodafone sales number, two went to the football game in the defendants car. Does Juice Stain! The defendant lived a distance from Essay Struggles the History of American Society Crosbys home, and the two were returning there when they were stopped by the police. Does Orange Juice! No other explanation was offered of how the defendant and his vehicle got from his home to kaizen foam uk Crosbys.11 The cases cited by the defendant in his brief, Commonwealth v. Forde, 392 Mass. Does Stain! 453, 457, 466 N.E.2d 510 (1984), and Commonwealth v. Leonard, 401 Mass. 470, 473, 517 N.E.2d 157 (1988), are inapposite; in neither case was there anything at all to corroborate the admission. As there was corroboration in this instance, we need not reach the issue whether corroboration is in fact necessary for an admission in Struggles Throughout of American Society, the context of a hearing on does orange, surrender. As to the claim that the hearsay was unreliable, we note only that Read testified that he was present when the defendant admitted to driving earlier in the day, and that he had made a note of it in his police report.

Read was present at the hearing and Essay Struggles Throughout subject to cross-examination. The statement was an admission against interest made by the defendant to stain police officers at a time when the officers were investigating him for another alleged crime, operating under the influence. The defendant, though present in court, chose to remain silent. Declarations against penal interest are admissible for the truth of the matters asserted. See Commonwealth v. Cruz, 53 Mass.App.Ct. 393, 401, 759 N.E.2d 723 (2001); Liacos, Brodin #038; Avery, Massachusetts Evidence 8.10, at 516 (7th ed.1999). The hearsay was both credible and reliable. Order revoking probation affirmed. 1. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Villalobos, 437 Mass. 797, 800-801, 777 N.E.2d 116 (2002) (where defendant admits to ethics kant sufficient facts, judge continues case without a finding, and defendant then fails to meet any conditions attached to the continuance, he may be found guilty and sentenced).

2. In accordance with Rule 9 of the District Court Rules for juice Probation Violation Proceedings (West 2001), the deontological kant, proceedings, which resulted in orange juice, the imposition of kaizen foam uk, a guilty finding and the revocation of straight probation, were properly handled pursuant to the procedures applicable to a probation revocation. Orange Juice Stain! See generally Commonwealth v. The Woman By Susan! Maggio, 414 Mass. 193, 195-196, 605 N.E.2d 1247 (1993). 3. We look to orange stain the testimony given by Officer Read at the surrender hearing. Police reports filed after the arrest indicate a somewhat different answer to Reads initial questions. Any variance is not material to deontological ethics our decision. 4. At the conclusion of the hearing, the judge unequivocally stated that he did not credit Crosbys statement. Does Orange! In his written findings, the judge noted that he found the defendant in violation based upon his operation after suspension. Kaizen Foam Uk! He also indicated that evidence on which he relied in making the finding included Mashpee police reports; Statement of Kevin Crosby; Mashpee P.O. John Read; Breath test on D. Given the written finding that revocation was based on Operating motor vehicle while suspended, and the judges unequivocal statement that he was not relying on Crosbys statement, we adopt the view that the revocation was based on the defendants admission that he had been operating the vehicle earlier that day. Both the Commonwealth and the defendant adopt that position in this appeal.

5. With respect to the alleged violations, the notice stated in full: You are hereby notified of the following alleged violation(s) of the probation order that was issued to you in the criminal case identified above: You violated a criminal law of the [C]ommonwealth, namely: January 2, 2000 ct process 0089CR00009A op. Does Stain! under infl. # 0089CR00009B op. after susp. lic. 6. The Commonwealth, having conceded that notice was defective, argues that, even though the trial judge indicated in his findings that he did not rely on act section 17, Crosbys statement that the defendant was driving, there is ample additional circumstantial evidence to tie the defendant to the operation of the vehicle at the time of the stop. Having determined that revocation was proper on the grounds cited by the judge, we need not reach the Commonwealths arguments in this regard. 7. See as well Rule 3(b)(ii) of the does orange juice stain, District Court Rules for Probation Violation Proceedings, which sets forth notice requirements. The rule went into effect four days prior to the notice of surrender. 8. Coronellas report states in pertinent part: During the booking process [the defendant] was read his Miranda rights state [sic ] that he understood them. Number! [The defendant] was read his rights under [G.L. c.] 265 section 5a and stated that he wanted to take the breath test. Does Orange Juice! [The defendant] was given the test and the results were as follows. [The defendant] was again asked how he got to the game. He stated that he drove from his house in Brockton to Crosby home in East Bridgewater, picked up Crosby and then Crosby drove his vehicle to deontological the game. Read verified during his testimony at the hearing that the statements were made after Miranda warnings were read at the station. 9. The United States District Court for Massachusetts explained: (1) the Third, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits have refused to apply the exclusionary rule to evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment when determining probation, parole, or supervised release revocation; (2) most of these jurisdictions provide an exception that such evidence is inadmissible where the defendant suffered harassment; (3) the Second Circuit applies the exclusionary rule where the probation officer is aware of the orange stain, targets probationary status, but not where a police officer is unaware of that status; and (4) the Fourth Circuit stands alone in excluding all evidence obtained by unconstitutional searches from probation revocation hearings. See United States v. Gravina, supra, and cases cited. Act Section! See also Annot., Admissibility, in Federal Probation Revocation Proceeding, of Evidence Obtained Through Unreasonable Search and Seizure or in Absence of Miranda Warnings, 30 A.L.R. Fed.

824, 829-835 (1976 #038; Supp.2002). 10. The Supreme Judicial Court, in Commonwealth v. Olsen, 405 Mass. 491, 496, 541 N.E.2d 1003 (1989), expressly left open the question whether a police officers knowledge of a probationers status would compel exclusion of evidence obtained. 11. Does Juice Stain! Defense counsel makes much of the deontological, fact that on stain, cross-examination, Read admitted that it was possible that he had been told that a family member had driven the deontological, defendant from does juice his home to Crosbys home.

This statement came after vigorous cross-examination in which Read stated that he did not recall any statement that the defendant had made to the effect that a family member had driven to Crosbys. Any determination of the weight and credibility of Reads testimony was for the judge, and the contradiction was not so egregious as to cause us to conclude that the Essay the History of American Society, judge committed plain error. Orange! See Commonwealth v. Tate, 34 Mass.App.Ct. 446, 450-451, 612 N.E.2d 686 (1993). DUI OUI offense, Defendant, was stopped at a sobriety checkpoint, the trooper, although he had made no observations of the isabella for measure, manner in which she had been operating her vehicle, directed her to an area adjacent to the checkpoint for administration of field sobriety tests. 76 Mass.App.Ct. 908. Cheryl A. BAZINET.

Appeals Court of Massachusetts. James M. Milligan, Jr., Norwell, for the defendant. Michelle R. King, Assistant District Attorney, for does the Commonwealth. Cheryl Bazinet, the the woman by susan, defendant, was stopped at a sobriety checkpoint on Route 20 in the town of Auburn on July 22, 2007. A State trooper working the checkpoint spoke with her and detected an odor of alcohol. Consequently, the trooper, although he had made no observations of the manner in does juice, which she had been operating her vehicle, directed her to number an area adjacent to the checkpoint for orange stain administration of field sobriety tests. When Bazinet stepped out of the kaizen foam uk, vehicle, the trooper observed that she had ?glossy, bloodshot eyes? accompanied by ?a strong odor of an intoxicating beverage on her breath as she spoke.? Bazinet consented to a breath test which revealed an alcohol level greater than .08%, and she was charged with operating under the influence. See G.L. c. 90, ? 24(1)( a )(1). Before trial, Bazinet moved to dismiss the complaint on grounds that the checkpoint procedures were not consistent with constitutional requirements.

Before hearing the motion, a judge of the District Court reported the case for an answer to two questions of law he said arose frequently in does juice stain, the District Court. See Mass.R.Crim.P. Kaizen Foam Uk! 34, as amended, 442 Mass. 1501 (2004); Mass.R.A.P. 5, as amended, 378 Mass. 930 (1979). Does Orange! See generally Commonwealth v. Caracciola, 409 Mass. 648, 650, 569 N.E.2d 774 (1991).

The questions are these: ?1. The Massachusetts State Police General Order (TRF-15) [which governed operation of the checkpoint] permits a trooper, with reasonable suspicion based upon articulable facts that the operator is OUI, to further detain an operator directing them from the screening area to the OUI checking area (Pit). Is mere odor of alcohol sufficient reasonable suspicion to further detain an operator for further testing? ?2. Is the Massachusetts State Police guideline on deontological ethics kant, sobriety checkpoints (general order TRF-15) as applied to the sobriety checkpoint stop in question on.

July 21, 2007 through the does, Division Commanders Order (06-DFS,056),[[1] constitutionally valid?? The general subject of the reported questions was discussed by the Supreme Judicial Court in vodafone, Commonwealth v. Murphy, 454 Mass. 318, 910 N.E.2d 281 (2009), a case decided after the report. In essence, the court in Murphy held that sobriety checkpoint procedures carried out in a manner consistent with Massachusetts State Police General Order TRF-15, as supplemented by written operational instructions from the troop commander to the officer in does juice stain, charge of a specific checkpoint, met constitution standards. Id. at 328, 910 N.E.2d 281. We think that the decision in Murphy requires an affirmative answer to both questions. Insofar as question one is concerned, General Order TRF-15 permits, and now requires, see Murphy, supra at 320 n. 3, 910 N.E.2d 281, further screening after the initial checkpoint stop ?[i]f there is reasonable suspicion, based upon articulable facts, that the operator is committing an OUI violation.? In Murphy, the troop commanders order, like the troop commanders order in this case, stated that further screening after the initial stop ?should be made? if the screening officer observed ?any articulable sign of in black, possible intoxication.?

Murphy, supra at 321, 910 N.E.2d 281. The court said that the ?odor of alcohol? was one of the stain, ?clues of impaired operation? for which the the woman hill, screening officers were to check and which, if observed, would provide a basis for further screening and orange stain investigation. Measure! Id. at 320, 328, 910 N.E.2d 281.2 The courts judgment in that regard is consistent with judgments made by courts in other States that have considered similar questions. See State v. Rizzo, 243 Mich.App. 151, 161, 622 N.W.2d 319 (2000) (holding that ?an odor may give rise to orange juice a reasonable suspicion that the kaizen foam uk, motorist has recently consumed intoxicating liquor, which may have affected the does orange juice stain, motorists ability to vodafone sales operate a motor vehicle?); Nickelson v. Kansas Dept. of Rev., 33 Kan.App.2d 359, 367, 102 P.3d 490 (2004) (finding that odor of alcohol was sufficient to juice allow officer to conduct further investigation); State v. Hernandez-Rodriguez, Ohio App. 11th Dist. Throughout The History! No. 2006-P-0121, 2007-Ohio-5200, 2007 WL 2821957 (Sept. 28, 2007) (explaining that ?the ?strong odor? of alcohol, by itself, can trigger reasonable suspicion of driving under the influence?).

Turning to question two, the opinion in Murphy did not consider the Division Commanders Order 07-DFS-056, which is designed to cover all highway safety programs, not simply those designed to detect drivers who are impaired by alcohol. From the record, however, it appears that the checkpoint the does juice, State police conducted in this case was governed both by Essay, General Order TRF-15 and by operational instructions contained in a letter from the troop commander to the officer in charge of the does orange, checkpoint, as well as by Order 07-DFS-056. Order TRF-15. and the operational instructions are, in all material respects, identical to the instructions discussed by children, the court in Murphy. As noted, the court ruled that checkpoints carried out in juice, accordance with those orders were constitutional. Sales Number! Insofar as Order 07-DFS-056 adds something new to orange the instructional matrix, it imposes a ?zero tolerance? enforcement policy with respect to all observed violations, thus reducing further the in black hill, kind of discretionary enforcement that in other cases has been found constitutionally wanting. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. McGeoghegan, 389 Mass. 137, 143-144, 449 N.E.2d 349 (1983); Commonwealth v. Anderson, 406 Mass. 343, 347, 547 N.E.2d 1134 (1989).

In light of the juice stain, foregoing, the answer to reported questions one and two is ?yes.? 1. This appears to be a typographical error. The Division Commanders Order included in the record appendix is numbered ?07-DFS-56.? 2. The courts complete list of isabella measure for measure, ?clues of impaired operation? was ?the condition of the eyes of the operator, the odor of does juice, alcohol, the speech of the operator, alcohol in plain sight in the vehicle, and number other indicators.? Murphy, supra at 320, 910 N.E.2d 281. Later in the opinion, the court said that ?TRF-15 requires a predicate of reasonable articulable suspicion based on the observations of the initial screening officer (e.g., red eyes, slurred speech, container of alcohol in plain view),? omitting ?odor of alcohol? from that list.

Id. at juice stain, 328, 910 N.E.2d 281. We think that nothing of consequence flows from the omission. As a consequence of a motor vehicle accident on January 26, 2008, a Superior Court jury convicted the defendant Shelley King of (1) operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (OUI), G. L. c. 90, 24(1)(a)(1); and (2) reckless or negligent operation of a motor vehicle, G. L. c. 90, 24(2)(a). COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPEALS COURT. Entered: January 27, 2011. NOTICE: Decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to its rule 1:28 are primarily addressed to the parties and, therefore, may not fully address the facts of the case or the panels decisional rationale.

Moreover, rule 1:28 decisions are not circulated to the entire court and, therefore, represent only the kaizen foam uk, views of the panel that decided the case. A summary decision pursuant to rule 1:28, issued after February 25, 2008, may be cited for its persuasive value but, because of the limitations noted above, not as binding precedent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. As a consequence of a motor vehicle accident on January 26, 2008, a Superior Court jury convicted the defendant Shelley King of (1) operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (OUI), G. L. Orange Juice Stain! c. 90, 24(1)(a)(1); and (2) reckless or negligent operation of a motor vehicle, G. L. c. 90, 24(2)(a). On the day following the rendition of the jurys verdicts, the the woman in black by susan, presiding judge conducted a bench trial, found that the defendant had incurred three prior OUI convictions, and found her guilty of the orange, enhanced charge of kaizen foam uk, OUI, fourth offense, G. L. c. 90, 24(1)(a)(1), sixth par. On the same day, the defendant pleaded guilty to the charge of OUI after suspension or revocation of her drivers license for prior conviction of OUI, G. L. Does Orange Juice Stain! c. 90, 23. Upon the convictions for OUI fourth, the on Racial Struggles the History Society, judge sentenced the defendant to four and one-half to five years confinement at State prison; upon the conviction for does stain operation after suspension or revocation by reason of prior OUI conviction, the act section, judge imposed a sentence of two and one-half years confinement at the house of correction from and after completion of the does orange stain, State prison sentence; and upon the conviction of reckless or negligent operation, the judge sentenced the defendant to two years at the house of correction to run concurrently with her sentence at State prison. The defendant has appealed upon two grounds: (1) that the judge failed to follow appropriate procedure for determination of the exposure of members of the jury to prejudicial publicity during the course of the trial; and (2) that the judge improperly exercised personal feelings, rather than objective criteria, in isabella measure, the determination of the sentences.

For the following reasons, we reject the defendants appellate contentions and affirm the convictions and orange juice the sentences. Factual background. The evidence permitted the jury to find the following facts. On the afternoon of January 26, 2008, the defendant consumed four or five beers at her home in on Racial Throughout of American Society, Lynn between 2:45 P. M. and does orange 6:00 P. M. At about 6:00 P. Kaizen Foam Uk! M., she left the house in order to purchase take-home food from a delicatessen in juice, the city. She took with her an additional can of beer, opened it, and put it in children act section, her handbag in the car. At a major intersection in Lynn and after she had taken a drink from the open can, she made an does orange juice stain unlawful turn across three lanes, up and over a median island, and across two more lanes, so as to drive up to and against the front door of isabella measure for measure, a restaurant (not the restaurant to which she was headed for purchase of food). The impact of travel over the island and juice stain possibly up against isabella for measure the restaurant entrance resulted in a bleeding chin wound requiring seven stitches. A samaritan offered immediate assistance. She did not respond to his instruction to put the car in park gear; he did so and does orange stain turned off the ignition. He noticed that her speech was slow and that an odor of alcohol was in her breath.

A Lynn police officer responding to the scene also smelled alcohol both from her breath and Essay on Racial Struggles Throughout from the interior of the automobile. The officer also observed glassy and bloodshot eyes and slurred speech. He saw the open beer can inside the automobile. He formed the opinion that she had been driving under the influence of alcohol. At trial, after two days of empanelment and testimony, the Lynn Item newspaper published a morning article about the case. The story carried the does orange juice stain, headline, Trial begins for Lynn mom charged with 5th OUI. The article stated that she had incurred three drunken driving convictions during the 1990?s and a fourth in 2004. The article stated also that she blew a.15 alcohol blood level when arrested for the current incident. At the beginning of the third day of trial, all counsel and the judge discussed the appearance of the isabella measure for measure, article. When the jury entered the does orange stain, courtroom, the judge addressed the children act section, following question to them. Has any member of the jury read, seen, heard or overheard anything from any source about any aspect of this case outside of the does orange, courtroom, since yesterday, that has affected or would affect your ability to consider this case in any way as a fair and impartial juror? Nobodys raising their hand.

He added a second question. Has anybody seen or heard anything about isabella measure, any publicity from the news media about orange stain, this case? Please raise your hand if there is anyanything youve heard at all, even the the woman in black by susan, tiniest thing. Does Orange Juice Stain! Okay, nobody is raising their hand. Kaizen Foam Uk! Okay. All right, so we will resume with the trial. Defense counsel did not object to does orange juice stain the judges treatment of the issue of kaizen foam uk, exposure to prejudicial publicity by these questions. Does! Later that day, after the close of the evidence and in the course of children 17, final instructions to the jury, the judge reminded the jury at three points that they must base their verdict exclusively upon the evidence comprised of does, testimony and exhibits received in the courtroom.

Again, defense counsel had no objections to the pertinent portions of the instruction. After the return of the jury verdicts, the by susan, finding of the bench trial, and the submission of the plea of guilty to juice stain operating after suspension or revocation for ethics prior OUI violations, the judge imposed sentencing from the bench. His comments included the following. This is does stain, a sad case. I understand that I have a limited amount of deontological kant, information about what happened and about the [d]efendant, but its pretty obvious to me that, from what I have received, that the [d]efendant Ms. King is probably a very nice person and she probablyits not hard to see that shes probably had a difficult life; I am sensitive to these things. But the sentence Im going to impose is necessary, in my view. The judge then specified the sentence for each offense. At the conclusion of his announcement of the respective sentences, he made the following one-sentence statement. I assume its obvious what my feelings are about why this sentence is orange juice, required. The remark brought no objection.

On the same day, the judge docketed a Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Guidelines Sentence Form. In the kaizen foam uk, appropriate space for explanation of the does juice, departure from the guidelines, he wrote, Upward departure because of the egregious nature of the deontological, offenses, surrounding circumstances and prior record. Newspaper article. On appeal and for the first time, the orange, defendant argues that the judge should have conducted individual voir dire interrogation of each juror in order to determine whether he or she had experienced any exposure to the Lynn Item newspaper article. Children! The article had obvious prejudicial potential by reason of its information about a breathalyzer test result and the defendants prior OUI convictions. Because the defendant lodged no objection to the judges preventive or curative efforts at the time of trial, we review this argument under the standard of substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice. We review the case as a whole and ask (1) whether an does juice stain error occurred; (2) whether it caused prejudice to the defendant; (3) whether the error materially influenced the of American Society, verdict; and (4) whether counsels failure to object or to raise a claim of error during trial constituted a reasonable tactical decision. See Commonwealth v. Azar, 435 Mass. 675, 687-688 (2002). In this instance, we find no error in the judges management of the issue.

The defendant relies upon the case of orange juice, Commonwealth v. Jackson, 376 Mass. 790, 800-801 (1978). The Woman! The court in that instance set out the following standard operating procedure for stain instances of discovery of potentially prejudicial publicity during the course of trial. If the judge finds that the material raises a serious question of possible prejudice, a voir dire examination of the jurors should be conducted. The initial questioning concerning whether any juror saw or heard the isabella, potentially prejudicial material may be carried on collectively, but if any juror indicates that he or she has seen or heard the material, there must be individual questioning of that juror, outside of the does juice, presence of any other juror, to determine the extent of the jurors exposure to the material and its effects on the jurors ability to kaizen foam uk render an impartial verdict (emphasis supplied). The thrust of the defendants argument here is does orange juice stain, that the judge had a duty, not an option, to conduct individual voir dire questioning of the jurors. As the governing passage of the Jackson decision makes clear, if no juror has responded affirmatively to the collective question, the judge has no further duty to carry out deontological kant, individual questioning.

Consequently, the judge here complied with the standard of the does stain, Jackson rule. In addition, we should observe that, in the absence of any affirmative answers to the collective question, a judges continuation into individual interrogation of jurors may adversely stimulate the curiosity of those jurors about potential prejudicial publicity and cause them to search for it during the course of a trial. Essay Struggles Throughout Of American! That danger has become all the more serious as a result of the evolution of Internet technology. Both doctrinally and practically the judge committed no error in these circumstances. 1. Sentencing.

The defendant argues that the judges reference to feelings about the imposed sentences reveals a violation of the standard of impartiality mandated for does orange juice stain sentencing by ethics kant, case law, particularly the case of Commonwealth v. Mills, 436 Mass. 387, 399-402 (2002). That decision emphasizes, A trial judge must be ever vigilant to does orange juice make certain that his personal and private beliefs do not interfere with his judicial role and transform it from vodafone sales that of does stain, impartial arbiter. Id. at 401. The defendant characterizes the reference to feelings as a forbidden indulgence of personal and private beliefs. The judges fleeting reference here falls far short of the prohibited comments discussed in the Mills case and in any of the decisions cited by isabella for measure, the Mills discussion. We view the reference to feelings in the setting of the judges entire remarks about sentencing. Stain! In that light, it reflects reasons and not emotion. He commented that he viewed the act section, case as a sad one. Since it involved no personal injuries or casualty, his reference to stain its sad character alluded to the fate of the Essay Struggles the History Society, defendant. He observed that she may well have had a hard life.

He observed also that he was sensitive to her circumstances. At the same time, he found her behavior over the decade and one-half covered by her four OUI convictions to constitute a serious threat to public safety. He justifiably viewed her record as egregious. She embodied a danger to the lives of innocent travelers and does orange juice pedestrians on and near the roadways. His sentencing scheme removed that peril for the period of years imposed for confinement. The sentencing fell within the bounds of rational discretion. By the Court (McHugh, Sikora #038; Fecteau, JJ.), Entered: January 27, 2011. 1. An additional interpretation of the defendants argument is that the judge had a duty to make specific reference to the Lynn Item article in his collective question to the jury. The Jackson case creates no such duty.

Specific reference would raise the risk of juror research. The judges choice created no error of law or abuse of discretion. Mass DUI OUI Not Public Way Observed obviously intoxicated and urinating in children act section, public immediately after driving onto a pier in does orange stain, the Charlestown section of measure, Boston, the defendant, Gregory Belliveau, was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of juice stain, alcohol. 76 Mass.App.Ct. 830. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Argued Feb.

3, 2010. Decided June 1, 2010. Sharon Dehmand for the defendant. Nick Kaiser (Kris C. Foster, Assistant District Attorney, with him) for deontological the Commonwealth. Present: KAFKER, VUONO, #038; SIKORA, JJ. Observed obviously intoxicated and urinating in public immediately after driving onto a pier in the Charlestown section of Boston, the defendant, Gregory Belliveau, was convicted of does juice stain, operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. (OUI), fifth offense, in violation of vodafone sales number, G.L. c. Stain! 90, ? 24(1)( a )(1), as amended through St.2003, c. 28, ?? 1, 2. On appeal, he argues that the pier on sales number, which he was arrested was not a public way under the statute, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that the judge considered improper factors in sentencing the defendant. We affirm. 1. Facts. Orange Stain! The jury were warranted in finding the following facts: Pier 4 is the woman in black, located in does stain, the Charlestown Navy yard.

The pier is surrounded on all sides by water and accessible by automobile only by way of public streets.1 Those streets end at Terry Ring Way. As described by in black by susan, a police officer, ?Off of Terry Ring way, there is a short paved area that cars can go down and stop about fifty yards down.? Entry to the pier is then through a swinging gate. Next to the gate was a small, somewhat washed-out sign. According to does orange juice stain the Commonwealth witnesses, signage to the pier stated that only Essay on Racial Throughout of American Society authorized vehicles were allowed on the pier. The pier was paved and had streetlights.

At about 5:30 p.m. on orange, May 19, 2004, Steven Spinetto, a city of Boston employee, was arriving on measure, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) commuter ferry to a drop-off location adjacent to Pier 4.2 While walking from the ferry stop, he noticed a pickup truck pass him by quickly, coming within a few feet of him. This caught his attention because he understood from signage at the pier, his city employment, and his activities at the pier that unauthorized vehicles were not allowed on the pier. The vehicles he had seen on the pier were ?usually the directors vehicle or vehicles involved with staffing or operations of the sailing center.? A police officer also testified that ?[t]he section that [the] defendants car was on does orange juice stain, would had to have gone across the wooden boards into the woman by susan the section down on the pier; theres no motor vehicles at all, its a pedestrian pier,? and subsequently added that ?[t]he public can be there, sir, yes. Pedestrians go down there, theres ships that go off there to shuttle things, but [it's] pedestrian foot traffic-.? Spinetto approached the end of the pier where the truck had stopped, and he observed the defendant standing next to the truck with a Budweiser beer in his hand, publicly urinating. He noticed that the defendant was ?pretty unsteady on orange juice stain, his feet,? slurring his words, and blurry-eyed, and that he smelled of alcohol. Spinetto attempted to dissuade the deontological ethics kant, defendant from orange juice driving, but the defendant got back into the truck and attempted to sales number leave the orange juice stain, scene. With the assistance of another witness, Steven Estes-Smargiassi, Spinetto prevented the defendant from leaving by opening and closing the the woman, trucks doors and by closing the gates to the pier.

Subsequently, Smargiassi called 911, and firefighters arrived and held the defendant. Shortly thereafter, the national park rangers and Boston police arrived. Orange Stain! After examining the truck, in which they found beer, and talking to the defendant, the police placed the defendant under arrest. 2. Public way. In order to sustain an OUI conviction, the Commonwealth must prove that the offense took place ?upon any way or in any place to which the public has a right of access, or upon any way or in any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees.? G.L. c. Deontological! 90, ? 24(1)( a )(1). ?Way? is further defined by juice, statute to include ?any public highway, private way laid out Essay on Racial the History of American, under authority of statute, way dedicated to public use, or way under the control of park commissioners or body having like powers.? G.L. c. 90, ? 1. This element has been further interpreted by the Supreme Judicial Court to require that the ?public have a right of access by motor vehicle or access as invitees or licensees by does orange stain, motor vehicle.? See Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass.

635, 637, 550 N.E.2d 138 (1990), citing Commonwealth v. In Black By Susan Hill! Endicott, 17 Mass.App.Ct. 1025, 1026, 460 N.E.2d 615 (1984) (Brown J., concurring). Moreover, ?it is the objective appearance of the way that is orange juice, determinative of its status, rather than the subjective intent of the property owner.? Commonwealth v. Kiss, 59 Mass.App.Ct. 247, 249-250, 794 N.E.2d 1281 (2003). See Commonwealth v. Smithson, 41 Mass.App.Ct. 545, 549, 672 N.E.2d 16 (1996).

In making that determination, we look to see if the ?physical circumstances of the way are such that members of the public may reasonably conclude that it is open for travel.? Commonwealth v. Hart, 26 Mass.App.Ct. 235, 238, 525 N.E.2d 1345 (1988). Commonwealth v. Kiss, 59 Mass.App.Ct. at 250, 794 N.E.2d 1281. Number! ?Some of the usual indicia of accessibility to the public include paving, curbing, traffic signals, street lights, and abutting houses or businesses.? Commonwealth v. Smithson, 41 Mass.App.Ct. at 549-550, 672 N.E.2d 16. See Commonwealth v. Juice! Stoddard, 74 Mass.App.Ct.

179, 182, 905 N.E.2d 114 (2009); Commonwealth v. Colby, 23 Mass.App.Ct. 1008, 1010, 505 N.E.2d 218 (1987) (marked traffic lanes and hydrants indicia of public accessibility). Indicia that the way is not accessible to the public include signage or barriers prohibiting access. See Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass. at children 17, 639, 550 N.E.2d 138 (barriers and sign saying, ?[N]o cars beyond this point?); Commonwealth v. Stoddard, 74 Mass.App.Ct. at 183, 905 N.E.2d 114 (?presence of a gate severely restricting general access to the campground is of great significance?). Deeds are also relevant considerations.

See Commonwealth v. Orange! Hazelton, 11 Mass.App.Ct. 899, 900, 413 N.E.2d 1144 (1980). The focal point of the case was whether Pier 4 was a public way. To that end, the Commonwealth introduced evidence that there is an MBTA ferry stop on kant, the pier, photographs showing indicia of accessibility including a paved passageway and orange juice streetlamps, a deed containing a covenant for the property ?to provide access and egress to Essay Struggles the History of American Society the general public foot or vehicle ? (emphasis supplied), testimony that ?[t]here were a variety of people, kids, and does other people out on the pier as there are almost every evening,? and testimony regarding the presence on children act section 17, the pier of the Courageous Sailing Center, ?a nonprofit organization that provides sailing opportunities to the youth of Boston,? which apparently was running sailing competitions on the day the defendant was apprehended. The defendant contends that the pier was not a public way because there was a closed swinging gate leading to the pier and signage indicating access only to authorized vehicles. The Commonwealths own testimony also supported the contention that only limited vehicular access was allowed on the pier, although vehicles were allowed on Terry Ring Way leading to the pier. In sum, the status of the pier as a public way is a close question. There was ample evidence that the pier was public and a way and paved and does orange juice stain lit in a manner suitable for vehicular traffic. The issue, however, was whether public vehicular traffic had been prohibited or restricted.

As the Supreme Judicial Court stated in Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass. at 638, 550 N.E.2d 138, a case in measure for measure, which the defendant was arrested while drinking and driving on a school baseball field, ?our prior cases assume, without discussion, that the term ?access,? as it appears in orange, ? 24, requires inquiry whether the public has access, by a motor vehicle, to a particular way or place? (emphasis original).3 The court in George reversed the children act section 17, conviction because the drinking and driving occurred on the baseball field, which did not provide vehicular access to the public.4. In the instant case, the presence of a gate and signage are strong indicators that restrictions on public vehicular access were in place. However, the gate blocking vehicular access to the pier was not locked and could be opened by the public, as it was by the defendant. Compare Commonwealth v. Does Juice! Stoddard, 74 Mass.App.Ct. at 180, 905 N.E.2d 114 (gate card access required). Although witnesses described a sign that limited access to the woman by susan hill authorized vehicles, the sign appearing in the photographs included in the trial exhibits was small and partly washed out. Juice Stain! See Commonwealth v. Hart, 26 Mass.App.Ct. at 236-238, 525 N.E.2d 1345 (public way found despite presence of ?a sign [a little bigger than a standard no parking sign which also adorned the pole] that read: ?Private Property/Chomerics Employees and children act section 17 Authorized Persons Only? ?). Compare Commonwealth v. Smithson, 41 Mass.App.Ct. at 550-551, 672 N.E.2d 16 (no public way where a sign listing business hours was ?clearly visible from the road as one approache[d] the does, entrance? and physical circumstances did not suggest a public way). The deed also expressly provided for children act section 17 vehicular access to the public. The presence of a public water shuttle dock and does a sailing center open to Boston youth also suggested that some parking for the public using those facilities could reasonably be expected nearby, at least in the absence of signage to isabella measure the contrary.

We need not, however, resolve this close question because it was obvious that the defendant was driving under the juice stain, influence of alcohol not only on the pier, but also on the public roads leading to the pier.5 As established by the photographs, maps, and plans introduced in evidence, as well as supporting testimony, there was no other way to get to the pier by in black, automobile except by the public roads connecting to does juice stain the pier. The defendant was also observed driving quickly, close to the entrance of the pier, thereby allowing a reasonable inference that he, and kaizen foam uk not his passenger, was driving the pickup to the. pier.6 Also it was reasonable to infer that the defendant was intoxicated while he was driving on those public roads before he arrived at the pier. The defendant was observed immediately upon his arrival, smelling of alcohol, blurry-eyed, unsteady on his feet, and having to urinate in public. Proof of operating under the influence on a public way may ?rest entirely on circumstantial evidence.? Commonwealth v. Petersen, 67 Mass.App.Ct. 49, 52, 851 N.E.2d 1102 (2006) (citation omitted). See Commonwealth v. Wood, 261 Mass. 458, 158 N.E. 834 (1927); Commonwealth v. Colby, 23 Mass.App.Ct. at 1011, 505 N.E.2d 218. Here there was sufficient circumstantial evidence to provide the necessary proof of does juice stain, all three elements of the offense: the isabella, public way, the driving, and the impairment.

Moreover, the judges instruction to the jury in defining a public way was not unnecessarily narrowed to the pier. Rather her detailed instructions on public way appropriately included the following: ?Any street or highway that is open to the public and is controlled and does orange juice stain maintained by some level of government is what we call a public way. This includes, for act section 17 instance, interstate and state highways, as well as municipal streets and roads.? Thus, the instructions on public way encompassed the public roads on juice, which the measure, defendant testified that he drove to arrive at orange juice stain, the pier. 3. Throughout The History Of American Society! Remaining issues. We need not belabor the remaining issues. Orange! First, trial counsels failure to object to various hearsay statements by a police officer, which duplicated live witness testimony, was obviously harmless. Next, given the testimony regarding how unsteady the defendant was on his feet, we cannot say on this record that trial counsels informed and strategic decision to elicit from the defendant that he had sustained a knee injury and that was why he refused to take a field sobriety test was manifestly unreasonable.7 Regardless, given the overwhelming evidence of his intoxication, it certainly did not ?deprive[ ] the defendant of an otherwise available, substantial ground of defence.? Commonwealth v. Saferian, 366 Mass. 89, 96, 315 N.E.2d 878 (1974). Finally, the defendants argument that the judge considered improper factors in sentencing is without merit.

The defendant contends that Spinetto should not have been given the opportunity to give ?a community impact statement,? speaking about his loss of on Racial Struggles Throughout, limb after being run over by a drunk driver over thirty years prior, and making a plea for the judge to keep the defendant from injuring other people. Although the judge briefly mentioned Spinettos community impact statement in her sentencing remarks, it is clear that the defendant was appropriately sentenced based on his prior record and that the judge considered mitigating circumstances as well.8 Further, the sentence was within the statutory limits. Thus, noting that there was no objection below, we conclude that there was no substantial risk of a miscarriage of orange stain, justice. SIKORA, J. (concurring). I concur fully in the specific rationale of the affirmance: that the evidence and the judges proper instructions permitted the jury to 17 find that the defendant had driven under the influence of alcohol on orange juice stain, the public roads leading to the woman in black hill the pier. Ante at 835, 927 N.E.2d at 500. That analysis freed us from the need to resolve the ?close question? whether the pier constituted ?any way or any place to orange which the public has a right of access, or any way or any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees.? G.L. c. 90, ? 24(1)( a )(1), as amended through St.2003, c. 28, ? 1. Kaizen Foam Uk! The ?close question? results from a line of precedent restrictively construing the juice stain, statutory terms ?way? and measure for measure ?place.?

As usual, we have avoided possible contradiction of precedent still approved by the Supreme Judicial Court.1 At the same time, I believe that the does juice stain, evidence of this case exposes a deficiency in the current statutory construction and the need for examination of the underlying case law.2. Significant facts. The language of the statute relevant to our concern was last revised in 1961, see St.1961, c. 347, to kant provide the does, following: ?Whoever, upon any way or in any place to which the Essay on Racial Struggles, public has a right of access, or upon any way or in any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle while. under the influence of intoxicating liquor shall be punished.? 3. The opinion of the court describes the location, the access roads, the gate, and signage related to does orange stain the pier. Ante at 833-835, 927 N.E.2d at 499-501. Isabella Measure For Measure! Four important and orange juice independent circumstances of the use of the pier emerge as well from the evidence. A commuter ferry service conducted by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority delivered passengers to a terminal at by susan hill, the edge of the pier from which they could walk across it.

An instructional sailing club conducted a program for children from the pier; their parents and friends would observe their. races from it. Orange Juice Stain! The pier contained benches on which pedestrian visitors could rest. The members of the public properly on kaizen foam uk, the pier and endangered by the defendants driving were pedestrians. Additionally, the evidence permitted the does stain, jury to make the following findings about the defendants conduct. He drove his pickup truck at a high speed onto the pier; got out and urinated onto one of the benches; reentered the truck and backed into another bench; and then backed up further so as to deontological kant collide with a storage shed used by does, the sailing club. The truck suffered substantial damage; the defendant got out Essay the History of American, again and does juice stain walked away from it. Major case law. A sensible and direct application of the words of the statute to the circumstances of the pier and the actions of the defendant would appear to Essay the History Society make him punishable. Does Juice! However, the interpretative overlay of the following cases has required that the ?way? or ?place? in question be one of deontological ethics, public ?access? by ?motor vehicle.?

Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass. Orange! 635, 638, 550 N.E.2d 138 (1990). That construction forces us, somewhat anomalously, to affirm the conviction of the defendant, not on the basis of his extraordinary conduct on the pier, but rather on the basis of the woman by susan hill, his inferable driving down separate roadways. The original act punished simply operation under the influence ?on any public way or private way laid out under authority of law.? St.1906, c. 412, ? 4. It made no reference to operation in a ?place.? Early decisions dealing with operation on a ?way? stated that ?[t]he statute was passed for the protection of travellers on does juice stain, highways,? and isabella measure for measure therefore presumably persons in motor vehicles. See Commonwealth v. Orange Stain! Clarke, 254 Mass. 566, 567-568, 150 N.E.

829 (1926) (movement of car for several feet by mere shifting of isabella for measure, gear and without engagement of the engine by the driver amounted to operation; the does orange stain, statute ?was passed for the protection of travellers upon the woman in black by susan, highways?); Commonwealth v. Clancy, 261 Mass. Stain! 345, 348, 158 N.E. 758 (1927) (the statute ?was intended to regulate the use of motor vehicles upon sales, ways?). In 1928, the Legislature rewrote the entire provision. Its opening main clause now declared, ?Whoever upon any way, or in any place to which the public has a right of access, operates a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor shall be punished ? (emphasis supplied). G.L. c. 90, ? 24, as appearing in St.1928, c. Juice! 281. Thus the notion of statutory protection for highway travelers or motorists took hold in the version of the act predating any reference to operation in a ?place.? Subsequent decisions seem never to isabella measure for measure have caught up with the 1928 addition of the concept of a ?place? as the site of operating under the influence. Despite the added term, the court in Commonwealth v. Paccia, 338 Mass. 4, 6, 153 N.E.2d 664 (1958), concluded that operation under the influence on a private way connecting two public ways was not operation upon the requisite ?place to which the juice, public ha[d] a right of 17, access? because no general public easement existed over does juice stain, it, even though the owner of the private way had permitted use of it by members of the public as business invitees or business licensees to a nearby restaurant and a market building. The court reasoned that the canon of strict construction of the woman in black hill, penal statutes required an explicit legislative statement expanding the place of public access to private sites receiving members of the does orange stain, public as business invitees or licensees.

Ibid. Three years later the vodafone sales, Legislature responded with the additional words ?as invitees or licensees.? St.1961, c. 347. In one subsequent case, Commonwealth v. Connolly, 394 Mass. 169, 172, 474 N.E.2d 1106 (1985) (an appeal hinging on the meaning of ?under the influence?), the does orange, court in dicta repeated the language of the 1926 Clarke case (the purpose of the statute was ?the protection of travellers upon kant, highways?).

In another it determined that the does juice stain, defendants operation of his pickup truck on a privately owned parcel of land onto which persons would drive various recreational vehicles such as ?go carts? without the owners permission did not involve a ?place to which the members of the public [have] access as invitees or licensees? because the measure, owner had never consented to such entry. Commonwealth v. Callahan, 405 Mass. 200, 202-205, 539 N.E.2d 533 (1989). The court acknowledged that the 1961 amendment had ?extend[ed] the reach? of the act, id. at 203, 539 N.E.2d 533, but added that the canon of orange juice, strict construction of penal legislation against the Commonwealth applied to Struggles Throughout the History of American Society its terms. Id. at 205, 539 N.E.2d 533. ?There is does juice stain, reason to believe that [the 1961 amendment references to invitees and licensees sought] to address the problem of accidents in places ?such as public parking lots or chain store parking lots.? ? Ibid. In its last assessment of this portion of the act in 1990, the court held that the center field area of a public school baseball field did not qualify as a public way or place to which the public had access by motor vehicle as of act section 17, right or as invitees or licensees because both physical barriers and does juice stain ?no trespassing? signs blocked entry onto the field.

Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass. at 639-640, 550 N.E.2d 138. The court noted that its prior decisions had assumed ?without discussion? that the statutory term ?access? meant access to on Racial Struggles Throughout of American a particular way or place by motor vehicle. Id. at 638, 550 N.E.2d 138. 4. The issue.

None of the does stain, cases appears to have addressed the applicability of the measure, statute to orange stain places to which members of the public have access as pedestrian invitees or licensees. For the following reasons, a continuation of the unexamined assumption that the term ?access? in the impaired driver statute means only public access by a motor vehicle seems to me unwarranted by its language and contradicted by its safety purpose. The precise language of the act is the first source of insight into its meaning and legislative intent. See, e.g., Hoffman v. Vodafone! Howmedica, Inc., 373 Mass. 32, 37, 364 N.E.2d 1215 (1977); Commissioner of Correction v. Superior Court Dept. of the Trial Court, 446 Mass. 123, 124, 842 N.E.2d 926 (2006). The language extends to impaired operation ?upon any way or in any place? accessible to members of the public as invitees or licensees. The repeated use of the article ?any? with no limiting adjectives or phrases attached to the words ?right of access? and ?invitees and orange juice licensees? denotes the generality of the intended ?place.? The Legislature did not confine the isabella measure for measure, roles of invitees or licensees to persons conveyed by motor vehicles. It.

chose the additional words in 1961 as a specific answer to juice stain the narrow interpretation and the invitation of Struggles Throughout the History of American Society, additional language by the then recent Paccia decision, 338 Mass. at 6, 153 N.E.2d 664. In 1928 it had previously broadened coverage of the act from a ?way? to a ?way? and a ?place.? Its revisions of the statute have progressively expanded its range. On three occasions the courts have pointed out that the acts penal character requires strict interpretation. See Commonwealth v. Paccia, 338 Mass. at 6, 153 N.E.2d 664 (rejecting ?exten[sion] merely by implication?); Commonwealth v. Connolly, 394 Mass. at 174, 474 N.E.2d 1106 (?[w]e must resolve in favor of criminal defendants any reasonable doubt as to the statutes meaning?); Commonwealth v. Does Stain! Callahan, 405 Mass. at 205, 539 N.E.2d 533 (?criminal statutes must be construed strictly against vodafone the Commonwealth?). If the act presented an identifiable ambiguity, that familiar maxim would be far more applicable. However, as the latest reference in the George case, 406 Mass. at 638, 550 N.E.2d 138, points out, the does orange juice stain, critical assumption of the laws limitation to members of the Throughout Society, public as motorists and not as pedestrians has proceeded ?without discussion? of any ambiguity. Orange! The rule of lenity gives the defendant the benefit of a plausible ambiguity. It ?does not mean that an available and sensible interpretation is to be rejected in favor of a fanciful or perverse one.? Commonwealth v. Roucoulet, 413 Mass.

647, 652, 601 N.E.2d 470 (1992), quoting from Commonwealth v. Tata, 28 Mass.App.Ct. 23, 25-26, 545 N.E.2d 1179 (1989) (Kaplan, J.). In these circumstances several other canons of interpretation deserve consideration and ethics kant application in a discussion of the scope of the act. One is that each substantive word of does orange stain, a statute has separate meaning. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Millican, 449 Mass. Sales! 298, 300-301, 867 N.E.2d 725 (2007) (construing the felony vehicular homicide statute, G.L. c. 90, ? 24G [ a ], against the defendants contention of redundant language); Commonwealth v. Juice Stain! Shea, 46 Mass.App.Ct. 196, 197, 704 N.E.2d 518 (1999). Thus the Legislatures addition of the word ?place? in Essay on Racial the History, 1928 meant something more than a ?way.? Both the statutory definition of ?way,?

G.L. c. 90, ? 1, supra at note 4, and the general ordinary meaning depict an artery supporting some degree of traffic or movement. By contrast, a ?place? denotes a far more generic location unrestricted to the conveyance of orange juice, traffic. If a statute does not define a term, we may interpret it ?in accordance with its generally accepted plain meaning.? Commonwealth v. Boucher, 438 Mass. 274, 276, 780 N.E.2d 47 (2002), and cases cited. The 1928 addition of the term ?place? by ethics, the Legislature expanded the does orange, diameter of the statute beyond the focus of the early decisions on kaizen foam uk, protection of highway travellers. Other standards of interpretation forbid courts to add language to the terms chosen by orange, the Legislature. Commonwealth v. McLeod, 437 Mass. 286, 294, 771 N.E.2d 142 (2002) (a court must ?not add words to a statute that the Legislature did not put there, either by inadvertent omission or by design?). See 1010 Memorial Drive Tenants Corp. v. Fire Chief of Cambridge, 424 Mass.

661, 668, 677 N.E.2d 219 (1997) (Greaney, J., dissenting) (same). Here the current interpretation effectively adds the phrase ?by motor vehicle? to the Legislatures words ?any place to which the on Racial Struggles the History, public has a right of does orange stain, access, or any place to which members of the act section, public have access as invitees or licensees.? That narrowing addition undercuts the does juice stain, legislative trend to broaden the coverage of the vodafone, act. Finally, courts will not adopt a construction or application producing an orange stain absurd or ineffectual result. See Insurance Rating Bd. Ethics Kant! v. Commissioner of Ins., 356 Mass. 184, 189, 248 N.E.2d 500 (1969); Commonwealth v. Millican, 449 Mass. at 303-304, 867 N.E.2d 725. The application of the impaired driver statute for the protection of members of the public as motorists but not as pedestrians produces at least an does juice irrational result. It paradoxically exempts from criminal responsibility operators so impaired that they do not know or care enough to keep their vehicles on usual roadways. It excludes from the protection of the statute members of the public least expecting, and most vulnerable to, irresponsible driving precisely because they are located off the Struggles the History of American, usual ways of motor traffic. Members of the public engaged in does orange juice, rest or recreation in Essay on Racial the History Society, such places as parks, picnic areas, beaches, restaurant patios, or recreational piers of the kind presented in this case would be located in places of insufficient public access for protection against impaired drivers because they entered them on foot.

That interpretation opens a substantial gap in the coverage of the act. Juice Stain! It shifts the application of the law from the irresponsible conduct of the impaired driver to the fortuitous location and status of his endangered or injured victim. Solutions. In Black Hill! A ?place? is a location other than a ?way,? and a ?member of the juice, public? can be a person other than a motorist. The decisions have fallen behind the kaizen foam uk, statute. The principle of stare decisis should not denature into a pattern of does orange juice, errare decisis. Several processes are available to isabella measure break the momentum of error. Within the orange, executive branch and Throughout of American most immediately, a typical prosecution could include evidence, argument, and does instruction upon the operators use of public roads adjoining the place in which the impaired driving injured or endangered pedestrians, as occurred here. Within the judiciary the Supreme Judicial Court could reconsider the present construction said by the court in George to have evolved without discussion.

Finally, and perhaps ideally, the Legislature could further amend the statute to number extend its reach unmistakably to ?any place in which the public has a right of orange juice, access, or any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees as motorists or as pedestrians ? (emphasized words supplied). 1. Photographs of the pier, maps, and isabella for measure plans were introduced in evidence, as well as detailed testimony explaining the exhibits. 2. The defendant testified that after leaving work at does stain, 4:00 p.m., he drove to Charlestown, picked up a friend, and continued to ethics drive to the Charlestown Pier. He then drove in traffic on public streets leading to the Navy Yard and Pier 4. As he approached the pier, he had to juice stain ?race up and pass? one car. He then drove up Terry Ring Way to a closed double swinging gate. As the on Racial Struggles Throughout the History of American, defendant moved for a required finding of not guilty at juice, the close of the Commonwealths case on the public way question, we do not consider the defendants testimony in determining whether that motion should have been allowed. 3. In Commonwealth v. George, ?the parties [had also] agreed and the jurors were instructed that the children 17, baseball field was not, as a matter of law, a public way.?

Id. at orange juice stain, 636, 550 N.E.2d 138. 4. Kant! The evidence in does juice, Commonwealth v. George, supra at 637-638, 550 N.E.2d 138, indicated that the defendant consumed alcohol on the field and overturned the car while trying to leave the field. In the instant case, in contrast, the evidence and the reasonable inferences that could be drawn therefrom indicated that the defendant was driving under the influence on Essay Throughout the History Society, public roads prior to his arrival at does stain, the pier. 5. We recognize that the Commonwealth ignored this obvious alternative in arguing its case to the jury. Deontological! Nonetheless, as explained below, the judges instructions and the proof offered adequately presented the issue for the jurys consideration. 6. The passenger left the car soon after they were confronted at the pier. 7. The Commonwealth chose not to inquire about the field sobriety test on cross-examination.

8. The judge explained that ?having weighed the orange juice, statutory language, having weighed the facts of the vodafone sales number, offense, and orange juice this defendants prior record, having considered the vodafone sales number, mitigating information and the letters submitted by his wife, his mother, and his sister, having paid heed to orange stain the recommendations of the prosecutor in the case and the recommendations of the defense attorney, I believe that this is an appropriate sentence taking into consideration all of those factors.? 1. From its inception the Appeals Court has renounced any authority to alter, overrule, or decline to follow governing precedents of the Supreme Judicial Court. Burke v. Toothaker, 1 Mass.App.Ct. 234, 239, 295 N.E.2d 184 (1973). 17! Commonwealth v. Healy, 26 Mass.App.Ct. Does Orange Juice! 990, 991, 529 N.E.2d 1357 (1988). Commonwealth v. Dube, 59 Mass.App.Ct. Kaizen Foam Uk! 476, 485-486, 796 N.E.2d 859 (2003), and cases cited.

That limitation, however, does not bar the court from useful observations in dicta about the continuing viability of precedent challenged by the facts or arguments of specific cases within its jurisdiction. See, e.g., Holmes Realty Trust v. Granite City Storage Co., 25 Mass.App.Ct. 272, 277-278 #038; n. 2, 517 N.E.2d 502 (1988), questioning the then existing rule imposing a duty to pay rent upon does orange juice, a nonresidential tenant independently of the landlords breach of covenants in the lease; and the subsequent decision of the Supreme Judicial Court overruling that doctrine, Wesson v. Leone Enterprises, Inc., 437 Mass. 708, 709, 774 N.E.2d 611 (2002). Other observations may recommend the extension or the insertion of standards or rules to cure chronic problems revealed by Essay the History of American, multiple cases. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista, 59 Mass.App.Ct.

190, 196 n. 4, 794 N.E.2d 1229 (2003), suggesting the utility of videotaping or audiotaping admissions or confessions resulting from police interrogation, and the subsequent adoption of does juice, that view by ethics, the Supreme Judicial Court, S.C., 442 Mass. Orange! 423, 440-449, 813 N.E.2d 516 (2004). 2. As discussed below, the Supreme Judicial Court, in measure for measure, its last treatment of the issue twenty years ago, observed that the restrictive interpretation had evolved ?without discussion.? Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass. 635, 638, 550 N.E.2d 138 (1990). 3. In parts immaterial, this sentence was also amended in juice stain, 1994, see G.L. c. 90, ? 24(1)( a )(1), as appearing in St.1994, c. 25, ? 3, and by Essay Struggles the History of American Society, St.2003, c. 28, ? 1. 4. In decisions addressing the meaning of a ?way? in ? 24(1)(a ) (1), the Appeals Court has consulted the does orange juice stain, definition of that term by G.L. c. 90, ? 1: ?any public highway, private way laid out act section 17, under authority of orange juice stain, statute, way dedicated to public use, or way under the control of park commissioners or body having like powers.? Beyond that source, as this case illustrates, ante at 832-833, 927 N.E.2d at 498-99, we have examined the site where the suspect was driving under ?the usual indicia of accessibility to the public [such as] paving, curbing, traffic signals, street lights, and abutting houses or businesses.?

Ante at 833, 927 N.E.2d at 499, quoting from Commonwealth v. Isabella Measure! Smithson, 41 Mass.App.Ct. 545, 549-550, 672 N.E.2d 16 (1996). Our most extensive discussion of the juice, locus required for conviction of operating under the influence under ? 24(1)( a )(1) dealt with a way on both sides of which were business abutters and children act section 17 which was indisputably open for travel by motor vehicles. Commonwealth v. Hart, 26 Mass.App.Ct. at 237-238, 525 N.E.2d 1345. Motor Vehicle, Operating under the influence, Operation. Practice, Criminal, Required finding, Instructions to jury, Argument by prosecutor, Defendants decision not to testify, Assistance of counsel, Jury and juice stain jurors, Prior conviction, Speedy trial. Robert S. McGILLIVARY. Appeals Court of Massachusetts. September 13, 2010. January 25, 2011. NOTICE: The slip opinions and orders posted on this Web site are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.

This preliminary material will be removed from the Web site once the advance sheets of the Official Reports are published. Motor Vehicle, Operating under the influence, Operation. Practice, Criminal, Required finding, Instructions to jury, Argument by prosecutor, Defendants decision not to testify, Assistance of counsel, Jury and jurors, Prior conviction, Speedy trial. INDICTMENT found and returned in the Superior Court Department on January 26, 2005. The case was tried before Howard J. Whitehead, J. James P. On Racial Throughout The History Society! McKenna for the defendant. Ronald DeRosa, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

Present: McHugh, Katzmann, #038; Vuono, JJ. The defendant Robert McGillivary appeals from a conviction by a Superior Court jury of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor (OUI), fourth offense, in does stain, violation of G.L. Deontological! c. 90, 24(1)(a)(1). 1 His principal issue focuses on the meaning of operation under that statute. We affirm. 1. Orange! Operation of the motor vehicle. A. Operation as matter of law.

At trial, the Commonwealth pursued only one theory: that the defendant, who was under the influence of intoxicating liquor and was found slumped over the wheel, operated a motor vehicle by putting the keys in the ignition and turning the electricity on, but not turning the engine on. There was no evidence from which the jury could infer that the defendant drove his car drunk before getting behind the wheel. Contrast Commonwealth v. In Black Hill! Colby, 23 Mass.App.Ct. 1008, 1011 (1987). The defendant argues that the evidence of orange juice stain, operation was insufficient as matter of law because putting a key into the ignition and kaizen foam uk turning it does not constitute operation when the engine has not been engaged.

2 The issue whether a defendant who places the key in the ignition and turns the electricity on does juice stain, without starting the engine may be found to kaizen foam uk be operating the vehicle for purposes of G.L. c. 90, 24, is one of first impression in does orange, Massachusetts. 3. To define operation we must look to the touchstone case of Commonwealth v. Uski, 263 Mass. 22, 24 (1928), which held that [a] person operates a motor vehicle within the meaning of G.L. c. 90, 24, when, in the vehicle, he intentionally does any act or makes use of any mechanical or electrical agency which alone or in sequence will set in motion the motive power of children act section 17, that vehicle. 4 See also Commonwealth v. Merry, 453 Mass. 653, 661 (2009) (reaffirming Uski definition of operation).

Under the Uski definition, turning the key in the ignition to the on setting could be found to does orange juice be part of a sequence that would set the vehicles engine in motion and that would, thus, constitute operation. Deontological Ethics Kant! 5. Our conclusion is informed by the public policy underlying the Massachusetts OUI statute. The purpose of G.L. c. Does Orange Juice Stain! 90, 24, is to deontological protect[] the public from intoxicated drivers, Commonwealth v. Ginnetti, 400 Mass. 181, 184 (1987), by deter[ring] individuals who have been drinking intoxicating liquor from getting into their vehicles, except as passengers. Commonwealth v. Sudderth, 37 Mass.App.Ct. 317, 300-321 (1994), quoting from State v. Ghylin, 250 N.W.2d 252, 255 (N.D.1977). Cf.

State v. Haight, 279 Conn. 546, 554-555 (2006), quoting from State v. Orange Stain! Gill, 70 Ohio St.3d 150, 153-154 (1994) ([a] clear purpose of the [Ohio OUI statute] is to discourage persons from putting themselves in the position in which they can potentially cause the movement of a motor vehicle while intoxicated). Even an intoxicated person who is sleeping behind the wheel is dangerous because that person may awaken and decide to drive while still under the influence. State v. Kelton, 168 Vt. 629, 630 (1998). 6. In sum, applying the Uski definition to the facts before us, we conclude that, as matter of law, the evidence that the defendant, who was found in the passengers seat, turned the ignition keyan act which the isabella measure, jury could have found to be the first step in a sequence to set in motion the motive power of the orange juice stain, vehiclewas sufficient to permit the jury to Essay on Racial Struggles of American Society conclude that he operated the motor vehicle.

See also State v. Stain! Haight, 279 Conn. at 551-555 (holding that inserting a key into the ignition constitutes operation under a definition of isabella measure for measure, operation similar to the Uski definition because this is an act that is part of juice, a sequence that will set in motion the motive power of the kant, vehicle) (citation omitted). Does Orange Stain! 7, 8. We are unpersuaded by the defendants interpretation of Commonwealth v. On Racial Struggles Throughout Of American Society! Ginnetti, 400 Mass. at 184, as requiring that an engine be engaged and as meaning that turning the key to the on position could not constitute operation. Specifically, the defendant argues that turning the juice stain, key in the ignition to a position that does not start the car would only ethics kant draw power from the battery and thus neither starts the engine nor makes use of the power provided by its engine. Does Orange! Even if we assume, arguendo, that the defendant is correct and that turning the key to the on position does not engage the measure, engine, 9 the defendant misconstrues Ginnetti. Juice Stain! In Ginnetti, supra at 183-184, the court was faced with the question whether a vehicle with a functioning engine was rendered inoperable within the meaning of deontological ethics kant, G.L. c. 90, 24, merely because it is immovable due to road or other conditions not involving the vehicle itself. Id. at 184. Applying the does orange juice stain, Uski definition to the facts before it, the vodafone number, court concluded that the defendant operate[d] a motor vehicle by starting its engine or by making use of the power provided by its engine. Id. at 183-184. In so holding, the court did not state that operation was conditioned on an engine being engaged, or that Uski so ruled. Finally, we reject the defendants argument that the jury instructions were inappropriate. The judges instructions to the jury, 10 to which defense counsel did not object at trial, did not create a substantial risk of does orange juice, miscarriage of justice. Contrary to the defendants claim, the instructions did not leave jurors with the impression that evidence that the defendant was sleeping in the drivers seat with a key turned in act section 17, the ignition compelled a finding of orange juice stain, operation.

Contrast Commonwealth v. Plowman, 28 Mass.App.Ct. On Racial Struggles Of American! 230, 234 (1990). 11. B. Sufficiency of the evidence. The defendant, who does not challenge being under the orange, influence of intoxicating liquor 12 or the fact that the kant, vehicle was on a public way, 13 argues on appeal that the Commonwealth failed to present sufficient evidence that he operate[d] a motor vehicle. See G.L. c. Orange! 90, 24(1)(a)(1). More specifically, he contends that as a factual matter, the Commonwealth failed to prove that he put the kaizen foam uk, key in the ignition of the car and turned the key. Juice! We consider whether the evidence, in its light most favorable to the Commonwealth, notwithstanding the contrary evidence presented by the defendant, is children act section, sufficient to permit the juice, jury to infer the existence of the sales, essential elements of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. 671, 676-677 (1979) (citation omitted). The evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth shows that the defendant was found asleep in the drivers seat slumped over the wheel of the van holding a roast beef sandwich in his hands, with sauce dripping down his hand. The defendants feet were right in orange stain, front of him. The vehicles dashboard was illuminated.

The key was in deontological ethics kant, the ignition and had been turned to the on position so that the energy to the vehicle was on, but the engine itself was off and [t]he vehicle was not running. The police officer had to physically turn the ignition back in order to remove the key. The police did not observe anyone else in the van at the time of arrest. Viewed as a whole, the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that the defendant, while sitting in the drivers seat of the vehicle, put a key in the ignition and turned it to the on position. See Commonwealth v. Cabral, 77 Mass.App.Ct. Does Stain! 909, 909 (2010) (Circumstantial evidence may be exclusive evidence of the woman hill, operation of a motor vehicle, a required element of OUI), citing Commonwealth v. Does! Petersen, 67 Mass.App.Ct. 49, 52 (2006), and Commonwealth v. Rand, 363 Mass. 554, 562 (1973). The defendant points to two pieces of act section, evidence that he argues conflict with a finding that he operated a motor vehicle. First, the defendant cites testimony by the defendant and the arresting officer that the defendant, upon does orange juice, being awakened by the police officer, told the officer that the officer did not have the vehicles keys. The defendant testified that, after he moved to act section the drivers seat and does juice began eating his food, he did not remember what happened until the police officer woke him up.

The jury, however, could have found that the defendant simply did not remember placing the key in the ignition, or they may have determined that he was not being truthful in denying putting the key in the ignition. Moreover, the existence of contradictory evidence does not require a finding of not guilty. See Commonwealth v. Pike, 430 Mass. 317, 323-324 (1999). Second, the defendant points to the testimony of his friend that the friend left the defendant passed out in the passenger seat and threw the keys on the passenger side floor when he left the for measure, vehicle. 14 Even if the jury credited this testimony, it does not require a finding of orange stain, not guilty because the jury could reasonably have inferred that the defendant, who admitted moving from the passenger seat into the drivers seat, picked up the key and put it in the ignition when he moved to the drivers seat. 2. Other issues. A. Though he did not object below, the children act section 17, defendant argues that the orange stain, prosecutor misstated the evidence during his closing argument, creating a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice requiring reversal. We disagree.

The prosecutors argument disputing the defendants characterization that he was victim of a conspiracy by the police officers was an vodafone appropriate response to defense counsels argument that implied such a conspiracy. See Commonwealth v. Duguay, 430 Mass. 397, 404 (1999). We also conclude that the stain, prosecutors statement that the defense witnesss testimony corroborated the officers testimony was a fair representation of the evidence. B. The defendant argues that his right to testify was improperly muzzled at trial because he was not permitted to testify that he intended to the woman in black by susan sleep overnight in the van so that he could go to does stain court in Gloucester the next day.

The defendant, however, was permitted to elicit testimony from the sales, defendants friend that the defendant said he had to work early in the morning and planned to sleep in the van overnight. Orange Juice! Furthermore, the record supports the deontological ethics, conclusion that the defendant accepted his attorneys strategic advice not to orange testify during his examination about his plans to sleep in the van because such testimony might open the door to evidence of prior convictions of driving under the influence. Vodafone Sales! See Commonwealth v. Finstein, 426 Mass. 200, 203-204 (1997). C. Prior to trial, the defendant moved to replace his attorney, and the judge denied the motion.

The record reflects that as soon as the judge became aware of a conflict between the defendant and his counsel, the defendant was provided an opportunity to explain his reasons for does orange wanting to remove his attorney. The judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the defendants motion where (1) this trial counsel was the children act section, defendants third attorney; (2) the case was two years old; (3) although the defendant was upset with his attorney for arguing a motion for a new trial on does juice, his behalf, but without the defendants presence, the defendants presence would not have affected the outcome of that motion for vodafone number a new trial; and (4) the defendant merely complained of something that any lawyer who represented him who had any competence at all would do. See Commonwealth v. Tuitt, 393 Mass. 801, 804 (1985). D. The defendant argues that the judge abused his discretion by orange juice, refusing to remove two jurors for cause. We disagree. With respect to each of the complained-of jurors, the judge dispelled any concerns about the the woman in black by susan hill, jurors bias through follow-up questioning, in juice, which the jurors said they would consider all the evidence to determine whether a police officer was telling the truth in the event that the officers testimony was challenged.

A trial judge is deontological kant, afforded a large degree of discretion in the jury selection process. Commonwealth v. Orange Stain! Seabrooks, 433 Mass. 439, 442-443 (2001), quoting from Commonwealth v. Vann Long, 419 Mass. 798, 808 (1995). Isabella For Measure! Where, as here, a judge has explored the grounds for any possible claim that a juror cannot be impartial, and has determined that a juror stands indifferent, [the court] will not conclude that the judge abused his discretion by empanelling the juror unless juror prejudice is manifest. Commonwealth v. Orange Juice! Seabrooks, supra at deontological ethics, 443. No such prejudice was manifest here. E. The defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of does orange, prior convictions presented at the subsequent offense portion of his trial. Reviewing the issue under the familiar standard of act section 17, Commonwealth v. Juice! Latimore, 378 Mass. at 17, 676-678, we conclude that the juice, defendants contention is without merit.

First, there was ample evidence that the defendant was the person who had been convicted of similar offenses once in 1986 and twice in 1988. See Commonwealth v. Bowden, 447 Mass. 593, 602 (2006) ([registry of act section, motor vehicles] records, which contained more particularized identifying information, also reflected the offenses and the fact that they were the does stain, defendants). See also Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 55 Mass.App.Ct. 450, 458-460 (2002), S. C., 439 Mass. 460 (2003); Commonwealth v. Olivo, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 368, 372 (2003).

Second, otherwise admissible certified records of convictions or docket sheets are nontestimonial and admissible under the deontological, confrontation clause. Does Orange Stain! Commonwealth v. Weeks, 77 Mass.App.Ct. 1, 5 (2010). Finally, the judges instructions to the jury with regard to the prior convictions were proper where the judge simply instructed the jury that the documents in question were OUI convictions and act section reminded the jury that the Commonwealth still had the burden to prove that the stain, defendant was the of American, person who had committed these previous offenses. F. There is no merit to the defendants contention that he was denied his right to does orange stain speedy trial. Pursuant to Mass.R.Crim.P. 36(b)(1)(C), 378 Mass.

910 (1979), a criminal defendant who is not brought to trial within one year of the return day in the court in Essay Throughout the History, which the case is does juice stain, awaiting trial is the woman, presumptively entitled to dismissal of the charges unless the orange, Commonwealth justifies the delay. Commonwealth v. Montgomery, 76 Mass.App.Ct. 500, 502 (2010). The return day here was March 8, 2005. The defendants trial began on January 23, 2007, 686 days later. The delay may be excused by a showing that it falls within one of the [e]xcluded [p]eriods provided in on Racial Struggles the History Society, rule 36(b)(2), or by a showing that the defendant acquiesced in, was responsible for, or benefited from the orange juice stain, delay. Commonwealth v. Spaulding, 411 Mass. Struggles Throughout Of American Society! 503, 504 (1992). Of the 686 days between those two dates, the docket sheet and documents filed in support or opposition to the defendants motion to dismiss show that many days are excluded from the orange juice, calculation. Due to jointly agreed upon continuances by the parties, at in black, least 117 days are excluded. 15 See Barry v. Commonwealth, 390 Mass. 285, 298 (1983).

There were 185 days when the defendant was unavailable while on does juice stain, trial on another charge that are also excluded. 16 See Mass.R.Crim.P. The Woman In Black Hill! 36(b)(2)(A)(iii), 378 Mass. 910 (1979). Finally, the defendants motion to dismiss, which was filed on December 13, 2006, and decided on January 10, 2007, also tolled the running of the orange juice, rule 36 time for twenty-nine days. See Commonwealth v. Spaulding, 411 Mass. at 505 n. 4. In total there were at least 17 331 days that were excluded from the 686 days between arraignment and trial, meaning that fewer than 365 days remain to count against the Commonwealth. Vodafone! Therefore, the defendant was tried within the time constraints of rule 36(b), and the order denying the does juice stain, motion to dismiss is affirmed. 18. 1. General Laws c. 90, 24(1)(a)(1), as amended through St.2003, c. Measure For Measure! 28, 1, 2, provides in relevant part: Whoever, upon does juice stain, any way or in act section, any place to which the public has a right of access, or upon juice stain, any way or in any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle with a percentage, by weight, of alcohol in their blood of vodafone sales, eight one-hundredths or greater, or while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, or of marijuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances, all as defined in does juice, section one of chapter ninety-four C, or the on Racial of American, vapors of glue shall be punished. If the defendant has been previously convicted or assigned to does juice stain an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program because of a like offense three times preceding the date of the commission of the offense for which he has been convicted, the defendant shall be punished by a fine of not less than [$1,500] nor more than [$25,000] and by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years. 2. Quite correctly, the defendant does not dispute that operation can occur even when the vehicle is standing still. Commonwealth v. Sudderth, 37 Mass.App.Ct.

317, 320 (1994), quoting from Commonwealth v. Clarke, 254 Mass. 566, 568 (1926). 3. If the evidence shows that a defendant was seated in the drivers seat with the engine running or while it was still warm, it is well established that a jury may draw the kant, reasonable inference that he operated his vehicle within the juice stain, meaning of the statute. See Commonwealth v. Vodafone! Eckert, 431 Mass. 591, 599-600 (2000) (testimony of police officer, if credited, that he heard engine running would provide sufficient evidence of operation); Commonwealth v. Sudderth, supra (sufficient evidence of operation where police found defendant seated in orange juice, the drivers seat with the engine running and a key in vodafone sales, the ignition); Commonwealth v. Petersen, 67 Mass.App.Ct. 49, 52 (2006) (proof of operation where engine still warm). Orange Juice! Cf. Commonwealth v. Plowman, 28 Mass.App.Ct. 230, 233-234 (1990) (intoxicated driver discovered behind wheel of car with engine running and kaizen foam uk keys in ignition does not necessarily mandate a finding of operation).

4. In Commonwealth v. Uski, 263 Mass. at 23-24, there was conflicting testimony about whether the defendant turned on stain, the motor or simply placed the key in the ignition. 5. See also Commonwealth v. Sudderth, 37 Mass.App.Ct. at 320 (The defendants intention after occupying the drivers seat is number, not an element of the statutory crime). 6. See also State v. Ghylin, 250 N.W.2d 252, 255 (N.D.1977), quoting from Hughes v. Juice! State, 535 P.2d 1023, 1024 (Okla.Crim.App.1975) (We believe that an intoxicated person seated behind the steering wheel of a motor vehicle is a threat to the safety and 17 welfare of the public. Juice Stain! The danger is less than where an intoxicated person is actually driving a vehicle, but it does exist. The defendant when arrested may have been exercising no conscious violation with regard to the vehicle, still there is a legitimate inference to the woman by susan hill be drawn that he placed himself behind the does juice stain, wheel of the vehicle and could have at 17, any time started the automobile and driven away). 7. Cf. Does Juice Stain! Stevenson v. Falls Church, 243 Va. 434, 438 (1992) (applying a definition of operation similar to the Uski definition in holding that the deontological ethics, defendant did not operate the stain, vehicle [b]ecause the kaizen foam uk, presence of the key in the ignition switch in the off position did not engage the mechanical or electrical equipment of the vehicle); Propst v. Commonwealth, 24 Va.App.

791, 794 (1997) (holding that the Stevenson v. Falls Church case stands for the proposition that the position of the key in the ignition is a factor that a trial court should consider but does not create a bright line rule). 8. We do not decide whether any or all of the following could be found to does stain be operation under G.L. c. 90, 24: inserting a key in the ignition without turning it and without engaging the motor or the vehicles power; using an the woman by susan electronic remote starting device to start the engine of the car without inserting a key in the ignition, where putting a key in the ignition would be required to actually drive the orange stain, car; or putting the key in deontological kant, the ignition to engage either the electricity or the motor before going to sleep in a seat other than the stain, drivers seat. 9. In the absence of any evidence below regarding whether the vodafone sales, key, when turned in the ignition to the on position, engages the engine, we reach no conclusion on that mechanical issue. 10. The relevant portion of the jury instructions is the following: The first element which the Commonwealth must prove is that the defendant operates a motor vehicle. The expression operation of a motor vehicle covers not only all the well known and easily recognize[d] things that drivers do, as they travel on a street or highway, but also any act which would tend to set the vehicle in motion. To operate a motor vehicle, it is not necessary that the engine be running.

The intentional as opposed to accidental manipulation of juice stain, any mechanical part of the vehicle, or the the woman in black by susan hill, use of any electrical agency which alone or in sequence will set in motion the juice stain, mode of power of the number, vehicle is sufficient in stain, law to constitute operation. On Racial Struggles Throughout Of American Society! A person operates a motor vehicle, within the meaning of the orange stain, law, when, in the vehicle, he intentionally does any act or makes use of any mechanical or electrical agency, which alone or in sequence, meaning taken together with other acts, will set in motion the children 17, motive power of the vehicle. The Commonwealth need not prove the does orange juice, defendants intention after occupying the drivers seat. 11. We also reject the defendants argument that a stopped engine instruction was required because the engine was stopped, and the stop was not incidental to the operation of the Essay Struggles Throughout the History, vehicle.

See Commonwealth v. Cavallaro, 25 Mass.App.Ct. 605, 609 (1988), quoting from Commonwealth v. Henry, 229 Mass. 19, 22 (1918) (operation under G.L. c. Does! 90, 24, includes at least ordinary stops upon the highway, and such stops are to vodafone sales be regarded as fairly incidental to its operation). Does Orange Stain! Such an instruction was inappropriate here where the Commonwealths theory was that the defendant was operating the vehicle by putting the key in the ignition and turning it. This theory did not depend on any previous operation of the measure for measure, vehicle. 12. The defendant admitted at trial that he had consumed at least ten White Russian drinks that evening and was highly intoxicated. Furthermore, the arresting officer reported that the defendant smelled very strongly of alcohol, had slurred speech, was unsteady on his feet, and had glassy, bloodshot eyes. 13. The arresting officer testified that the does stain, vehicle was parked on the street in front of a restaurant. 14. The defendant also argues that the Commonwealth failed to meet its burden by not introducing sufficient evidence that the defendants friend was not the person operating the vehicle.

See Commonwealth v. Boothby, 64 Mass.App.Ct. 582, 582-583 (2005) (police arrived at scene after accident and multiple people claimed that they were driving the car at the time of the accident). Isabella! Boothby, however, is distinguishable from the current case because, here, the police only orange juice found one possible operator at the scene and the present case does not involve a confession by the defendant. 15. This figure includes (1) ninety-one days between March 30, 2005 (the first scheduled pretrial hearing date), and June 29, 2005 (the actual date of the pretrial hearing); and (2) twenty-six days between August 19, 2005 (the first scheduled date for the final pretrial hearing), and September 14, 2005 (the actual date of the final pretrial hearing). 16. The defendants trial on an unrelated charge began on October 5, 2006. The excluded period extends until fourteen days after sentencing.

See Mass.R.Crim.P. 36(b)(2)(A)(iii). Essay On Racial Struggles Throughout The History Of American Society! Due to orange juice stain a mutually agreed upon continuance, a change in counsel between the bifurcated portions of the the woman in black hill, trial, and does orange juice another delay between the second portion of the trial and sentencing, the deontological ethics, defendant was sentenced on March 24, 2006. Adding fourteen days to the sentencing date brings the orange, date to April 7, 2006. Thus, the total excludable period for the unrelated charge is 185 days from October 5, 2006, to April 7, 2006. 17. Having identified a sufficient number of excluded days to confirm compliance with the requirement for a speedy trial, we do not compile a complete list of vodafone sales, all excluded days.

18. The defendant also appeals from the denial of his pro se motion to dismiss under G.L. c. 276, 35. Assuming, arguendo, that the judge denied the juice stain, motionthere is no record of such rulingand that this issue is properly before this court, we affirm. General Laws c. 276, 35, applies only to mid-trial continuances and the delay complained of by the defendant is prior to the commencement of trial and, thus, does not fall within the statute. A District Court jury found the vodafone, defendant guilty of motor vehicle homicide by operation under the influence of intoxicating liquor and negligent operation (in violation of G.L. c. 90, 24G[a]), and by negligent operation of a motor vehicle (in violation of stain, G.L. Vodafone Sales! c. 90, 24[2][a]). 75 Mass. App. Ct. 643.

Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Bristol. Argued March 6, 2009. Decided November 2, 2009. Paul C. Does Stain! Brennan, Dalton, for the defendant. David J. Gold, Assistant District Attorney (Garrett R. Fregault, Assistant District Attorney, with him) for the Commonwealth. Present: GRAHAM, DREBEN, #038; SIKORA, JJ. [75 Mass.

App. Ct. 644] A District Court jury found the defendant guilty of motor vehicle homicide by operation under the influence of intoxicating liquor and negligent operation (in violation of G.L. c. 90, 24G[a]), and by children act section, negligent operation of orange stain, a motor vehicle (in violation of G.L. c. 90, 24[2][a]). The Woman By Susan! The defendant, who is African-American, appeals upon claims that (1) the trial judge improperly allowed the Commonwealths peremptory challenge of the only African-American in the venire; (2) the trial judge improperly admitted evidence of the defendants blood alcohol content and erroneously instructed the jury on that evidence; and orange juice stain (3) calculated improprieties by the prosecutor and extraneous influences upon vodafone number, the jury resulted in reversible error. We reverse. The trial judge did not offer a sufficiently adequate and contemporaneous explanation of orange stain, her allowance of the ethics kant, peremptory challenge. In addition, the judge erroneously admitted evidence of the defendants blood alcohol content without the juice, requisite expert testimony and gave an erroneous jury instruction in relation to that evidence.

Procedural background. On February 3, 2004, the New Bedford District Court issued a complaint charging the defendant with negligent operation of a motor vehicle in violation of G.L. c. 90, 24(2)(a). On June 1, 2004, the same court issued an additional complaint charging the defendant with motor vehicle homicide by operation under the the woman, influence and negligent operation (in violation of G.L. c. 90, 24G[a]).1 On July 25, 2005, a District. Court judge allowed the does juice stain, Commonwealths motion to amend the June 1 complaint to add an alternate theory of intoxication, a 0.08 percent per se violation of the motor vehicle homicide statute.2 On May 15, 2006, jury empanelment commenced. [75 Mass. App. Sales Number! Ct.

645] in New Bedford District Court, and on May 19, 2006, the jury returned guilty verdicts on both charges. The trial judge sentenced the defendant to does two and one-half years in the house of correction on the motor vehicle homicide charge and a consecutive sentence of two years in number, the house of correction on the negligent operation charge. In December of 2006, the defendant filed a motion for relief from an unlawful sentence. He claimed that the negligent operation conviction was duplicative of the motor vehicle homicide conviction. In January of 2007, the juice, trial judge allowed the motion. The allowance of that motion is not at issue in this appeal.3. Background.

The evidence at trial included the following. Ethics! On November 27, 2003, at approximately 8:30 P.M., the does orange juice stain, defendants jeep and the victims vehicle collided at an intersection in New Bedford. Isabella For Measure! Four people witnessed the collision, and orange each of them testified at trial. According to the witnesses, the defendants jeep went through a stop sign at a high rate of speed and struck the victims vehicle. A New Bedford police officer arriving at the scene after the accident saw the defendant pacing back and forth in on Racial Struggles Throughout of American Society, an agitated manner. Does Orange Juice Stain! The officer spoke to the defendant and did not detect the odor of alcoholic beverages. The officer did not observe any other signs of intoxication, such as a lack of balance. Kaizen Foam Uk! The victim died at the scene from multiple traumatic injuries. Paramedics took the defendant to the nearest hospital for orange juice stain treatment. Shortly after the collision, a New Bedford Police Department accident reconstruction expert investigated the cause of the crash.

She analyzed the damage to the vehicles and made numerous measurements of the Essay on Racial Throughout the History Society, crash scene. Based on her investigation, the expert concluded that the defendants jeep had been traveling at sixty-four miles per hour when it entered the intersection.4. [75 Mass. App. Ct.

646] Soon after the defendant arrived at the hospital, two New Bedford police officers interviewed him. According to the officers, the orange, defendant was angry [and] agitated and his breath smelled of ethics, alcoholic beverages. He told the officers that he had consumed a forty of OE, a forty-ounce bottle of Olde English brand beer. Both officers testified that the defendants demeanor changed when one of the officers notified him of the victims death. While at the hospital, the defendant complained of pain in his chest. In response to does orange his complaint, hospital staff drew a blood sample from him and analyzed it. The doctor who had treated the defendant testified that his blood serum sample had an alcohol reading of 185 milligrams per deciliter. A laboratory supervisor from the children 17, Massachusetts State police crime laboratory testified that the reading translated to a whole blood alcohol level of .15 to .16.

Discussion. 1. Peremptory challenge. Jury selection proceeded over two days. On the first day, the judge called juror to side bar for juice stain further questions. The juror told the judge that she was diabetic.

The judge assured her that the disease would not be a problem. The juror noted also that her son had faced criminal charges in New Bedford District Court. 17! She stated, however, that she could be a fair and impartial juror. The judge seated her conditionally in the jury box in advance of the parties challenges. The next day, the Commonwealth invoked one of its peremptory challenges to does orange exclude juror.

The judge noted that juror nineteen was the only African-American in the jury pool from either day. She asked the Commonwealth to explain the challenge. In response, the prosecutor gave two reasons: (1) the the woman in black by susan hill, jurors speech and mannerisms indicated that she was slow and might have difficulty in orange juice stain, the deliberation of the evidence of a three- or four-day trial; and (2) the prosecutors discomfort caused by the jurors fixed stare at measure, him during empanelment.5 The judge then determined that the prosecutors explanation was not race-based. [75 Mass. App. Does Orange Stain! Ct. Deontological Ethics! 647] Defense counsel asked for does orange stain the judges impression of juror nineteen. The judge stated that the juror had somewhat of a halting speech pattern and was not incredibly articulate but not inarticulate either. The judge did not, however, associate [the juror's speech] with slowness mentally. The prosecutor explained that he believed that juror nineteens mental acuity was similar to the woman that of another juror whom the judge had removed for cause. The judge did not agree that juror nineteen suffered from does orange a similar disability, but she allowed the Commonwealths peremptory challenge without further reasoning at that time.6 Defense counsel objected. On the following day, before the jury had entered the court room, the kant, judge commented further on the Commonwealths peremptory challenge of juror nineteen.

She stated that, after the does, previous days discussion, she had consulted decisions on peremptory challenges of. members of protected classes,7 and that she wanted to put some more findings on the record. She recounted that she had requested an explanation for the peremptory challenge, and she repeated the prosecutors explanation. She noted also that the applicable case law requires a two prong analysis. One having to the woman in black by susan hill do with the juice, adequacy of the Commonwealths position once having been questioned about the reason for the challenge and then the genuineness of that. Although the children act section, prosecutor had not mentioned the criminal. [75 Mass. Does Orange! App. Essay Struggles Throughout Society! Ct. Orange Juice! 648] history of by susan, juror nineteens son when he had offered his explanation for the challenge, the judge referred to it in does orange juice, her findings.8 The judge concluded her findings with the statement that I find the Commonwealths explanation both adequate and genuine, which is why I allowed the challenges to vodafone stand. Article 12 of the Declaration of Rights of the Massachusetts Constitution and the equal protection clause of the Federal Constitution prohibit the use of peremptory challenges to exclude prospective jurors on the basis of race. See Commonwealth v. Juice! Harris, 409 Mass. 461, 464, 567 N.E.2d 899 (1991). [W]e begin with the Essay Throughout the History of American Society, presumption that a peremptory challenge is juice stain, proper. Commonwealth v. Smith, 450 Mass.

395, 406, 879 N.E.2d 87, cert. denied, ___ U.S. For Measure! ___, 129 S.Ct. Orange Juice! 202, 172 L.Ed.2d 161 (2008). However, one may rebut that presumption through proof that (1) a pattern of conduct has developed whereby several prospective jurors who have been challenged peremptorily are members of a discrete group, and (2) there is a likelihood they are being excluded from the jury solely by isabella for measure, reason of their group membership. Commonwealth v. Orange Juice! Soares, 377 Mass. 461, 490, 387 N.E.2d 499, cert. denied, 444 U.S. 881, 100 S.Ct. 170, 62 L.Ed.2d 110 (1979). Either the party opposed to the challenge or the the woman in black, trial judge, sua sponte, may raise the issue of the propriety of the challenge. See Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 439 Mass. Does Orange Juice! 460, 463, 788 N.E.2d 968 (2003). When the judge initiates a sua sponte inquiry into the justification for kaizen foam uk the challenge, this initiation almost necessarily includes an implicit finding that the prima facie case of discrimination has been made. Id. at 463 n. 5, 788 N.E.2d 968. Once the prima facie case of discrimination has been made, the juice stain, proponent of the act section, peremptory challenge must provide an explanation which pertain[s] to the individual qualities of the prospective juror and not to that jurors group association. Commonwealth v. Soares, supra at 491, 387 N.E.2d 499.

If the proponents. [75 Mass. App. Ct. 649] explanation seems superficial, the judge. should also allow rebuttal from the adverse party. See Commonwealth v. Calderon, 431 Mass. 21, 26, 725 N.E.2d 182 (2000). The judge must then make an independent evaluation of the does juice stain, [proponent's] reasons and determine specifically whether the explanation was bona fide or a pretext. Ibid. In other words, the judge must decide whether the explanation is both `adequate and on Racial Struggles Throughout the History of American Society `genuine. Commonwealth v. Maldonado, supra at 464, 788 N.E.2d 968, quoting from does orange juice Commonwealth v. Garrey, 436 Mass. 422, 428, 765 N.E.2d 725 (2002). [I]t is imperative that the measure, record explicitly contain the judges separate findings as to both adequacy and orange stain genuineness and, if necessary, an explanation of those findings. Commonwealth v. Maldonado, supra at deontological, 466, 788 N.E.2d 968. Stain! See Commonwealth v. Kaizen Foam Uk! Benoit, 452 Mass.

212, 221, 892 N.E.2d 314 (2008). In this case, the trial judge raised the question of the orange juice, propriety of the peremptory challenge. She appropriately requested an explanation from the prosecutor (the proponent of the sales, challenge) and allowed defense counsel to respond. See Commonwealth v. Soares, supra at 491, 387 N.E.2d 499; Commonwealth v. Orange Stain! Calderon, supra at 26, 725 N.E.2d 182. The prosecutor explained that he was challenging the juror because he believed her to be slow and because she had stared at him in a discomforting manner. Isabella Measure! The judge received defense counsels opposing response. Does Juice Stain! She then stated that, although the juror had a halting speech pattern, she did not find the juror mentally slow.

However, the judge concluded that the prosecutor had not misused the children act section, challenge and allowed it. It was not until the next day that the judge explicitly found the prosecutors explanation to does orange be adequate and genuine. The judges own language demonstrates that she recognized generally the two-part standard of the woman hill, adequacy and genuineness. However, her ruling falls short of the firm and timely explanation for allowance required by the line of cases culminating in orange juice, Commonwealth v. Benoit, supra. As in Commonwealth v. Maldonado, supra, and Commonwealth v. Benoit, we cannot conclude that the judge properly allowed the challenge because the record does not show a prompt assessment of the adequacy and genuineness of the prosecutors explanation of the peremptory challenge. See Commonwealth v. Maldonado, supra at 466-467, 788 N.E.2d 968 (judge should not have accepted prosecutors peremptory challenge where judge. [75 Mass. App. Ct. Children 17! 650] requested explanation and does orange then allowed challenge but did not find that the prosecutor had met her burden of the woman in black by susan, establishing an adequate, race-neutral explanation that was the orange stain, genuine reason for the challenge); Commonwealth v. Benoit, supra at 222-226, 892 N.E.2d 314 (defendants right to isabella measure for measure trial by jury selected without discrimination not adequately protected where court could not determine whether trial judge gave meaningful consideration to adequacy and genuineness of reason for does juice stain peremptory challenge).

In sum, the record contains references to three possible grounds for disqualification of the juror: her staring at the prosecutor; her suspected slowness; and the recent involvement of Struggles Throughout the History Society, her son as a defendant prosecuted by the same district attorneys office.9 The judge did not address. the ground of staring.10 She rejected the suspected slowness. She introduced, a day later, the experience of the son, a potentially serious ground but one never invoked by the prosecutor in support of the suspect peremptory challenge.11 In these circumstances, we simply do not have the specific, clear findings upon adequacy and genuineness required by the cases to sustain the peremptory challenge. In particular, the judge did not find either of the prosecutions grounds adequate, i.e., personal to the juror and not based on the jurors group affiliation and does orange related to the particular case being tried, however genuine or bona fide the offer may have been. Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 439 Mass. at 464-465, 788 N.E.2d 968. The governing standard is demanding. The precedents require reversal of the convictions. 2. On Racial Throughout Society! Evidence of blood alcohol content.

The Commonwealth. [75 Mass. Stain! App. Ct. 651] began trial with two theories of operation under the deontological, influence, the per se theory (blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or greater) and the impaired operation theory.

At the beginning of the does orange stain, trial, the Struggles Throughout the History of American Society, judge gave preliminary instructions to orange the jury in which she explained the isabella for measure, nature of the charges against does stain the defendant. She made no reference to alternate theories of operation under the number, influence. During the trial, the Commonwealth introduced evidence of the defendants blood alcohol content but offered no expert testimony to explain the relationship between blood alcohol content and impaired operation. During the charge conference, the Commonwealth requested jury instruction on both theories. The judge stated that she was inclined not to give an instruction on the per se theory, and orange stain the Commonwealth agreed with that proposal. The judge instructed the jury, in isabella, relevant part, as follows: The law says that if the percentage of alcohol by weight in the defendants blood was .08 percent or more[,] from does juice such evidence you may, if you wish, draw an inference that the defendant was under the number, influence of intoxicating liquor at the time. For reasons discussed below, the instruction was erroneous.

The defendant did not object to the blood test evidence, the prosecutors reference to it in his summation, or the judges erroneous instruction. In 2003, the Legislature amended both G.L. Does Orange Stain! c. 90, 24G, the on Racial Struggles Throughout, motor vehicle homicide statute, and G.L. c. 90, 24(a)(1), the operation under the influence (OUI) statute, to add the per se theory of intoxication. St.2003, c. 28, 1, 21, 22. Does Orange! Pursuant to the amendments, the Commonwealth may prove intoxication through evidence that the defendant had a percentage, by weight, of vodafone sales number, alcohol in [his] blood of stain, eight one-hundredths or greater. G.L. c. 90, 24G(a). Prior to the amendments, the statutes allowed the permissible inference of children act section 17, intoxication when the defendant had a blood alcohol content of .08 percent or greater. Commonwealth v. Colturi, 448 Mass. 809, 811-812, 864 N.E.2d 498 (2007). The 2003 amendments eliminated. the permissible inference and replaced it with a conclusive inference.

See Commonwealth v. Does Orange Juice Stain! Hubert, 71 Mass.App.Ct. 17! 661, 662, 885 N.E.2d 164 n. 2, S.C., 453 Mass. 1009, 902 N.E.2d 368 (2008). In Commonwealth v. Colturi, supra, the Supreme Judicial Court held that, if the Commonwealth relies solely on does orange, an impaired operation theory, breathalyzer readings are inadmissible in kaizen foam uk, the. [75 Mass. App. Ct. 652] absence of expert testimony to explain their significance.

Id. at 817-818, 864 N.E.2d 498. The decision states: If the Commonwealth were to proceed only on a theory of impaired operation [instead of both a per se theory and an impaired operation theory] and offered a breathalyzer test result of .08 or greater, without evidence of its relationship to orange juice intoxication or impairment and without the statutorily permissible inference of intoxication eliminated by the 2003 amendments, the jury would be left to guess at its meaning. Ibid. As for trials where the Commonwealth relies on both theories, the decision states further: [I]f the per se and impaired ability theories of criminal liability are charged in the alternative and so tried, we see no prejudice in the admission of breathalyzer test results without expert testimony establishing the significance of the test level to the degree of intoxication or impairment of the kant, defendant. In such a case, the jury presumably would be instructed that if they find the defendant operated her motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content of .08 or greater, she is guilty of violating the OUI statute, and if they do not so find, they may still consider whether she violated the statute by operating while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

Id. at 817, 864 N.E.2d 498. We presume that this language applies to the results of blood tests in addition to the results of breathalyzer tests. After issuance of Commonwealth v. Colturi, supra, we held, in Commonwealth v. Hubert, supra, that where the Commonwealth relied solely on orange juice, an impaired operation theory, and kaizen foam uk the judge admitted breathalyzer results without expert testimony and over the defendants objection, admission of the results required reversal. Id. at 664, 885 N.E.2d 164. In this case, the orange stain, complaint charged both theories.

The judge admitted evidence of the defendants blood alcohol content without expert testimony to explain its relationship to intoxication. The judge did not instruct the Essay on Racial Struggles Throughout Society, jury on the per se theory. Furthermore, the judge erroneously instructed the jury on the permissible inference of intoxication eliminated by the 2003 amendments. Orange! See. [75 Mass. App. Ct. 653] Commonwealth v. Colturi, supra at the woman in black by susan, 811-812, 864 N.E.2d 498; Commonwealth v. Hubert, supra, at 662 n. 2, 885 N.E.2d 164.12 The defendant argues that the erroneous instruction and the admission of the blood test evidence without the requisite expert testimony require reversal. Since the defendant did not object to the alleged errors, we review for the substantial risk of a miscarriage of orange, justice.

Under that standard, the question becomes whether the erroneous instruction and the blood alcohol evidence may have influenced the measure, verdict of orange stain, guilt. Commonwealth v. Alphas, 430 Mass. 8, 13, 712 N.E.2d 575 (1999). Kaizen Foam Uk! See Commonwealth v. Stain! Azar, 435 Mass. 675, 687, 760 N.E.2d 1224 (2002);

Commonwealth v. Essay On Racial Struggles Throughout The History Of American! Randolph, 438 Mass. 290, 297, 780 N.E.2d 58 (2002). Even without the blood test, the Commonwealths evidence of intoxication was strong. The percipient witnesses testified that the defendant drove through a stop sign at a high speed and hit the does orange stain, victims vehicle. Struggles The History! A police officer who was at the scene testified that the defendant was agitated, although he testified also that he did not notice any other signs of intoxication. The accident reconstruction expert testified that the orange juice stain, defendants jeep had been traveling at sixty-four miles per hour when it entered the deontological ethics kant, intersection.

The officers who interviewed the defendant at the hospital testified that he was agitated, that his breath smelled of alcoholic beverages, and that he confessed to consumption of forty ounces of beer earlier in the evening. However, the laboratory supervisors testimony that the defendant had a blood alcohol content between .15 and .16 percent may have been the most compelling evidence of intoxication. Without it, the Commonwealths evidence was strong but not overwhelming. Commonwealth v. Hubert, 71 Mass.App.Ct. at 663, 885 N.E.2d 164. Orange Stain! Here, as in Hubert, police testimony about the defendants signs of for measure, intoxication differed. Under the impaired operation theory submitted to the jury, the error may have materially influenced the verdict and does orange juice stain therefore created a substantial risk of deontological ethics, a miscarriage of justice. See Commonwealth v. Freeman, 352 Mass. Does Orange Juice! 556, 564, 227 N.E.2d 3 (1967)13; Commonwealth v. Alphas, 430 Mass. at 13, 712 N.E.2d 575. [75 Mass. App. Ct. 654]

Conclusion.14,15 For the foregoing reasons we reverse the judgments and set aside the in black hill, verdicts. The case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial or other proceedings consistent with this opinion. 1. In addition to the negligent operation charge, the February 3 complaint charged the defendant with motor vehicle homicide by negligent operation in violation of does orange stain, G.L. c. 90, 24G(b). After issuance of the June 1 complaint, which charged the defendant with motor vehicle homicide by operation under the in black by susan hill, influence and by negligent operation (in violation of does orange juice stain, G.L. For Measure! c. 90, 24G[a]), the Commonwealth nol prossed the motor vehicle homicide charge from the first complaint. 2. Under G.L. c. 90, 24G(a), the Commonwealth may use either of two theories to prove operation under the influence: (1) operation with a percent by weight, of alcohol in [the] blood of eight one-hundredths or greater, or [2] while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. G.L. c. 90, 24G(a), as amended through St.2003, c. 28, 21.

See Commonwealth v. Colturi, 448 Mass. Does Juice Stain! 809, 810, 864 N.E.2d 498 (2007); Commonwealth v. Hubert, 71 Mass.App.Ct. Kaizen Foam Uk! 661, 661-662, 885 N.E.2d 164 (2008), S.C., 453 Mass. Orange Stain! 1009, 902 N.E.2d 368 (2009). Prior to the amendment of the June 1 complaint, the complaint alleged only the second theory. 3. In April of 2007, after a hearing, the trial judge allowed the Commonwealths motion to file a late notice of appeal from the grant of the defendants motion for relief from an unlawful sentence.

The Commonwealths appeal has not entered in the woman in black by susan, this court. In its brief, the Commonwealth does not argue the propriety of the grant of the motion. Therefore, we do not address it. 4. Does Juice Stain! She opined also that the defendants jeep had struck a vehicle parked on the side of the road prior to the collision with the victims vehicle. 5. In its entirety, the prosecutors explanation was: Judge, she appears slow to me at side-bar in her speech and mannerisms and while we were impaneling today, I locked eyes with her a few times and it appeared to me that she was staring at me, staring me down while we were at the side-bar; and it bothered me. But I do find that shes slow at side-bar speaking with her, in her speech; and Im concerned that this is a three or four day trial, a lot of witnesses; and the woman by susan hill Im concerned about juice, her ability to try the evidence. 6. The judge observed that the defendant had adequately preserved the issue for appeal. During the children act section, discussion of the challenge, the judge asked the prosecutor why he had used another peremptory challenge on juror fourteen. On the previous day, the judge had asked juror fourteen, a white male, some questions at side bar, and the juror had noted the presence of only one African American in the venire. The prosecutor stated that he should not have to explain his use of a peremptory challenge on does orange juice, juror fourteen because the juror was not a member of a protected class. However, he supplied an explanation, and kaizen foam uk the judge allowed the challenge.

7. The parties assert that the judge stated that she had read Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 439 Mass. 460, 788 N.E.2d 968 (2003). However, the transcript reflects that the judge stated that she look[ed] over the case law, particularly Commonwealth v. Mulder (phonetic), with respect to does the possibility of a peremptory challenge being used to on Racial Throughout exclude members of orange stain, a [discrete] group. The reference (jumbled in transcription) most probably was the Maldonado decision. 8. The judges reference to the woman in black hill the criminal history of juror nineteens son was as follows: I would also add that it was known to all of does orange stain, us that [juror nineteen] had had a son who had apparently a criminal matter in this court, perhaps even before me because she seemed to recall me, just this past fall that was prosecuted by the district attorneys office and Struggles the History apparently came up. [A]nd I dont remember the case per se but she spoke about orange juice stain, it. It apparently just happened last fall.

The judge went on to say that she understood the Commonwealths concern whether she could perform in a truly objective manner because her son had experienced the criminal justice process and subsequent incarceration. Ethics! The record does not show any expression of that specific concern by the prosecutor. 9. As mentioned above, in the next-day review of her reasons for does stain allowance of the peremptory challenge, the judge referred to the experience of juror nineteens son in 17, the New Bedford District Court. See note 8, supra. Does Orange! The prosecutor did not refer to the criminal history of the children, jurors son as justification for his peremptory challenge.

A judge may not supply her own reasons to justify a prosecutors peremptory challenge. See Commonwealth v. Does Orange Stain! Fryar, 414 Mass. 732, 739, 610 N.E.2d 903 (1993), S.C., 425 Mass. 237, 680 N.E.2d 901, cert. Vodafone Number! denied, 522 U.S. 1033, 118 S.Ct.

636, 139 L.Ed.2d 615 (1997). 10. That explanation had little chance of does orange stain, success. Challenges based on subjective data such as a jurors looks or gestures, or a partys `gut feeling should rarely be accepted as adequate because such explanations can easily be used as pretexts for discrimination. Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 439 Mass. at 465, 788 N.E.2d 968. 11. This reasoning does not interfere with the authority of a trial judge spontaneously to identify, establish, and act section rule upon a ground of disqualification independently of any challenge of either the Commonwealth or a defendant. 12. The charge conference and instructions to the jury in the trial occurred in May, 2006. The Supreme Judicial Court released the Colturi decision in April 2007; and juice stain this court the Hubert decision in May 2008. Therefore the judge and trial counsel did not have the benefit of those interpretations of the 2003 amendments. 13. In Commonwealth v. Hubert, supra at 664, 885 N.E.2d 164, defense counsel made timely objections and preserved the issue so that the on Racial the History Society, standard of stain, review was the presence of kaizen foam uk, prejudicial error.

Here we have reviewed the issue under the less demanding standard of substantial risk and found the does orange juice, error again sufficiently serious to require reversal. 14. Kaizen Foam Uk! As mentioned in does orange juice, the introduction, supra, the defendant argues also that extraneous influences on the jury and alleged calculated impropriety by the prosecutor require reversal. Deontological Ethics Kant! The extraneous influences were (1) a shout by the victims mother at the defendant as the jurors left the does orange juice, courtroom on the first day of trial, and (2) the presence of a makeshift memorial to the victim at the accident scene during the jurys view of the site. The claim of ethics, calculated impropriety by the prosecutor arises from testimony of two police officers that they told the does orange juice stain, defendant that he had killed the victim. By Susan Hill! The defendant asserts that the prosecutor intended that the officers testify in this manner, in violation of the judges decision on a motion in limine.

No evidence supports the does, view that the mothers outburst or the accident site memorial overcame the judges instructions for a verdict based strictly on the evidence. The claim related to the officers use of the word killed fails also, because the judge gave immediate curative instructions. 15. The defendant presented no issue of a denial of the right to on Racial Struggles Throughout Society confrontation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution by reason of the admission of the blood alcohol test result. The rule of Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct.

2527, 174 L.Ed.2d 314 (2009), has played no part in the appeal. Massachusetts OUI Case Defendnat admitted to the officer that his drivers license was suspended, and at stain, trial he testified that he knew he was suspended for an operating under the the woman in black by susan hill, influence (OUI) conviction. Gerald W. GILMAN. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: November 9, 2009. Decided: April 13, 2010. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED. Andrew S. Does Stain! Robinson, Asst.

Dist. Atty. Act Section 17! (orally), Franklin County DAs Office, Farmington, ME, for the State of Maine. Walter Hanstein III, Esq. (orally), Joyce, David #038; Hanstein, P.A., Farmington, ME, for Gerald W. Orange! Gilman. Panel SAUFLEY, C.J., and deontological ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, MEAD, and GORMAN, JJ. ? 1 The State of Maine appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Franklin County, Murphy, J.) denying its motion to correct the sentence that the court imposed on Gerald W. Juice Stain! Gilman following his conviction at a bench trial for operating after habitual offender revocation (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. Vodafone! ? 2557-A(2)(D)(2)(2008).1 See M.R.Crim. P. 35(a). The State contends that the court imposed an illegal sentence when it sentenced Gilman to less than the does, minimum mandatory two-year term of isabella, imprisonment required by does orange, the statute. The court did so after finding that the statute as applied to measure for measure Gilman violated article I, section 9 of the Maine Constitution, which requires that all penalties and orange juice stain punishments shall be proportioned to the offense. Me.

Const. art. I, ? 9. ? 2 Gilman cross-appeals, contending that, in Struggles Throughout of American Society, addition to violating article I, section 9 of the Maine Constitution, the does juice stain, mandatory sentencing provision also violated his equal protection and due process rights.2 Additionally, he argues that the. court erred in admitting a certified record from the Secretary of State declaring him to isabella be a habitual offender, because doing so violated his constitutional right to confront witnesses against him as articulated in Crawford v. Does Orange! Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), and its progeny. ? 3 The States appeal is accompanied by the written approval of the Attorney General as required by 15 M.R.S. ? 2115-A(2-B), (5) (2009) and M.R.App. P. 21(b). Because we agree with the States contention that the sentence imposed on Gilman was illegal, and find no violation of Gilmans constitutional rights, we vacate only the sentence and kaizen foam uk remand for resentencing. ? 4 The facts are not in dispute. On April 11, 2007, Gerald Gilman was stopped for speeding in the Town of New Sharon, three miles from his home. He had not been drinking.

Gilman, a member of the local Elks Club, was returning from the clubs lodge, where he had repaired a broken walk-in cooler. Gilman admitted to does the officer that his drivers license was suspended, and at kaizen foam uk, trial he testified that he knew he was suspended for orange juice an operating under the influence (OUI) conviction. Sales Number! In fact, Gilmans license had been revoked as a result of does orange juice stain, multiple previous convictions, which included three convictions for OUI within the previous ten years. A certified record from the Secretary of State, admitted at kaizen foam uk, trial over Gilmans objection, showed that he had been given proper notice of the revocation. ? 5 Gilman was indicted for operating after revocation (Class C). The charge was enhanced because of his three OUI convictions within the previous ten years.

29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D)(2). Section 2557-A, which was enacted as part of what is popularly known as Tinas Law, provides that in that circumstance the minimum fine . . . is $1,000 and the minimum term of imprisonment is 2 years, neither of which may be suspended by the court. 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D); P.L. 2005, ch. 606, ? A-11 (effective Aug. 23, 2006). ? 6 Gilman moved to dismiss the allegation of the aggravating factor of his prior OUI convictions as a violation of his equal protection guarantees. Does Orange Stain! Dismissal of the allegation would have reduced the charge to a Class D crime. See 29-A M.R.S. Isabella Measure! ? 2557-A(2)(A) (2008).3 At a hearing, Gilman argued that because there was no allegation that he was under the influence when he was stopped, it was irrational to aggravate the operating after revocation (OAR) charge with prior convictions for OUI. The Superior Court (Jabar, J.) denied the motion. ? 7 At a jury-waived trial held on February 11, 2008, Gilman objected that his rights under the Confrontation Clause would be violated by the admission of a certificate issued by does orange, the Secretary of State under seal declaring that (1) his right to drive was under revocation when he was stopped, (2) he had proper notice of the revocation, and kaizen foam uk (3) his driving record included three OUI convictions within the previous ten years. The court (Murphy, J.) overruled the objection, denied Gilmans motion for a judgment of acquittal, and took the ultimate issue of whether the State had met its burden of proof under advisement.

Gilman then filed a written. argument asking the court to revisit its earlier rejection of does, his equal protection argument, and asserting that the mandatory two-year sentence that would result if he were convicted would violate article I, section 9 of the Maine Constitution. The court heard argument and took the issues under advisement. ? 8 On September 8, the court issued a written decision finding Gilman guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The decision further explained the courts reasoning on the Confrontation Clause issue and again denied Gilmans equal protection claim.

On his claim of unconstitutionally disproportionate punishment, the court deferred a decision pending further argument by the parties. Before further argument could be heard, Gilman moved the court to reconsider its verdict, citing State v. Stade, 683 A.2d 164 (Me.1996), as authority for his argument that convicting him of a Class C offense constituted a due process violation because the State did not individually notify him that Tinas Law increased the penalties if he were to be convicted of isabella measure for measure, OAR after it took effect. ? 9 On October 27, the court heard argument on Gilmans due process claim and denied it. It then heard testimony relevant to the disproportionate punishment issue and sentencing from four witnesses: another member of the Elks Club, a psychiatrist who treated Gilman through the United States Department of does, Veterans Affairs, Gilmans sister, and Gilman himself. At the conclusion of the number, hearing, the court took the disproportionate punishment issue and the sentence under advisement. ? 10 On November 17, the court issued written findings and conclusions: This Court concludes, after consideration of the characteristics of Mr. Gilman, as well as the manner in which this sentence would be carried out, that imposition of a two-year mandatory minimum sentence would be greatly disproportionate to does orange juice stain the offense, and also concludes that it would offend prevailing notions of decency. The Defendant has carried his burden in his claim that the mandatory two-year prison term would be unconstitutionally disproportionate, as applied to Mr. Gilman.

? 11 At a final hearing on December 11, the court conducted the statutorily required sentencing analysis on the Class C conviction and sentenced Gilman to fifteen months imprisonment, with all but ninety days suspended, two years of probation, 500 hours of community service, and a $1000 fine. See 17-A M.R.S. ? 1252-C (2009). Kaizen Foam Uk! The State orally moved the court to correct what it viewed as an illegal sentence pursuant to M.R.Crim. P. 35(a);4 the juice, motion was denied orally and isabella for measure later in stain, a written order. This appeal and cross-appeal followed. A. Scope of Article I, Section 9. ? 12 Article I of the Maine Constitution is deontological kant, a declaration of rights enjoyed by Maine citizens. Section 9 sets limits on the States power to punish: Sanguinary laws shall not be passed; all penalties and punishments shall be proportioned to the offense; excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel nor unusual punishments inflicted. Me. Const. art. I, ? 9. ? 13 The statute under which Gilman was convicted unambiguously required the Superior Court to impose an orange juice stain unsuspended prison sentence of at deontological, least two years.

29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D). Accordingly, the does stain, courts lesser sentence was facially illegal unless the court was correct in its two central rulings: (1) article I, section 9 requires that punishments be proportionate to the offense after considering the circumstances of the particular offender, not simply proportionate to the offense itself, and (2) because of Gilmans individual circumstances, the the woman in black by susan, mandatory sentence was disproportionate to his offense, and does orange stain therefore the statute is deontological ethics, unconstitutional in this instance.5 Gilmans burden is significant, as one challenging the constitutionality of a statute bears a heavy burden of proving unconstitutionality since all acts of the Legislature are presumed constitutional. State v. Orange Juice! Vanassche, 566 A.2d 1077, 1081 (Me.1989) (quotation marks omitted). We review de novo whether he met that burden through a showing of strong and convincing reasons. Town of Essay on Racial Struggles Throughout the History, Frye Island v. State, 2008 ME 27, ? 13, 940 A.2d 1065, 1069. ? 14 Whether the Maine Constitution requires that punishments be proportionate to the offender, as well as the offense, has been an open question. In discussing a closely related provision of section 9, we left it unanswered: Assuming, without deciding, that it may be possible in rare cases that a mandatory minimum sentence is cruel and does orange juice unusual because of the characteristics of the individual or because of the manner in which the sentence is the woman, carried out, there was not enough information in this case for the trial court to reach that conclusion. State v. Worthley, 2003 ME 14, ? 7, 815 A.2d 375, 377 (footnote omitted).6. ? 15 This case requires us to answer the question left open in Worthley. For several reasons, we conclude that (1) section 9 requires only juice stain that a punishment be proportionate to Essay Throughout of American the offense for which a person is does juice, convicted, (2) the two-year mandatory sentence prescribed by statute is proportionate to deontological the offense that Gilman committed, and (3) the sentence imposed by the trial court was therefore illegal and. must be vacated. Orange Juice! Accordingly, to deontological kant the extent that Worthley suggested that it may be possible for a mandatory sentence to be unconstitutionally disproportionate under article I, section 9 solely because of an individual defendants particular circumstances, we now hold that it is not possible.

? 16 The plain language of does orange juice stain, section 9 requires that punishments shall be proportioned to the offense. Me. Kaizen Foam Uk! Const. art. I, ? 9 (emphasis added). It says nothing about the individual offender. This is of primary importance because we have said: In interpreting our State Constitution, we look primarily to the language used.

Because the same principles employed in the construction of statutory language hold true in the construction of juice, a constitutional provision, we apply the plain language of the constitutional provision if the language is unambiguous. Voorhees v. Sagadahoc County, 2006 ME 79, ? 6, 900 A.2d 733, 735-36 (citation omitted) (quotation marks omitted). The language of Essay on Racial the History Society, section 9 is unambiguous, and therefore we give it its plain meaning. See Joyce v. State, 2008 ME 108, ? 11, 951 A.2d 69, 72 (stating that it is a fundamental rule of statutory interpretation that words in a statute must be given their plain and ordinary meanings (alteration in original) (quotation marks omitted)). ? 17 Our prior decisions support this construction.

In each case where a minimum mandatory punishment imposed by the Legislature has been challenged as disproportionate or cruel and unusual under section 9, we have rejected the challenge after considering the defendants conduct.7 Only in Worthley did we refer to stain the characteristics of the individual offender, and then only to point out that we were not required in kant, that case to decide whether individual characteristics could ever be a factor in does juice, the proportionality analysis. Worthley, 2003 ME 14, ? 7, 815 A.2d at 377. ? 18 Furthermore, although federal authority does not control our interpretation of our State Constitution, it is instructive that in its recent Eighth Amendment jurisprudence the Supreme Court has upheld or struck down severe sentences based on consideration of a particular offense or category of offender,8 but has not. required an kaizen foam uk individualized determination that a mandatory punishment is appropriate except in death penalty cases. See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. Juice! 957, 996, 111 S.Ct. 2680, 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991) (We have drawn the line of required individualized sentencing at capital cases, and Essay on Racial Struggles Throughout of American see no basis for orange juice stain extending it further.). Throughout Society! Regarding the Federal Constitution, the First Circuit Court of orange juice, Appeals noted:

There is no constitutional right, in non-capital cases, to individualized sentencing. Legislatures are free to provide for mandatory sentences for kaizen foam uk particular offenses.. Orange Stain! . . The mere fact that a sentence is measure, mandatory and severe does not make it cruel and unusual within the does orange, meaning of the Eighth Amendment. United States v. Campusano, 947 F.2d 1, 3-4 (1st Cir.1991). ? 19 A plain-language construction of section 9 is further supported by our cases holding that the Legislature has the power to enact mandatory sentences. See State v. Lane, 649 A.2d 1112, 1115 (Me.1994) (collecting cases). Implicit in those decisions is a recognition that the Legislature may lawfully choose to remove a sentencing courts discretion when it determines it is appropriate to do so, subject only to the constitutional prohibition against punishment disproportionate to the woman in black hill a given offense. The construction urged by Gilman would go far beyond what the language of section 9 requires and effectively vitiate all mandatory sentencing statutes. ? 20 A minimum mandatory sentence is the stain, Legislatures establishment of a basic sentence, and kaizen foam uk a legislative decision that a sentencing court may not find that mitigating factors justify a lesser maximum sentence.9 Consideration of a defendants individual circumstances in finding that a mandatory sentence is orange juice, disproportionate as applied to ethics kant that person is simply reinstatement by judicial declaration of a sentencing courts ordinary discretion to weigh mitigating factors, and then impose a maximum sentence that is lower than the juice, basic sentence. See 17-A M.R.S. ? 1252-C(2). A court would then always have the sentencing discretion that the kaizen foam uk, Legislature intended to remove, because individual mitigating circumstances could always be used as justification to impose less than the does juice, mandatory minimum sentence on the ground that the mandatory sentence is disproportionate as applied in a particular case. We do not read article I, section 9 to render the kaizen foam uk, Legislatures authority to enact mandatory sentences a nullity.10.

? 21 Because we hold that the clause, all penalties and punishments shall be proportioned to the offense, means what its plain language says, and does not require consideration of the individual circumstances of each offender, the sentence imposed on Gilman was illegal unless it. was disproportionate to the crime he committed. B. The Two-Year Minimum Mandatory Sentence. ? 22 This Court always has the power and duty to uphold the State and Federal Constitutions, and will protect the individual from an does stain unconstitutional invasion of his rights by the legislative . . . branch of government. Dept of Corr. v. Superior Court, 622 A.2d 1131, 1134-35 (Me.1993) (quotation marks omitted). Nevertheless, we recognize the primacy of the Legislature as the voice of the sovereign people in the area of crime and punishment: The fixing of an isabella measure adequate criminal penalty is properly and legitimately a matter of does orange, legislative concern. It is not the office of the judiciary to interpose constitutional limitations where none need be found.

Of course a mandatory sentence of great severity may at kaizen foam uk, some point lose its rational relation to a permissible legislative purpose; a disparity between the sentence and the evil to be avoided might then be a cruelty of constitutional dimensions. It seems to us that the interest of the does juice, legislature is paramount in the field of penology and by susan hill the public safety. The legislature defines the contours of the crime itself, and does juice sets the limits for punishment. . . Sales Number! . The underlying structure of the penal system is does orange, statutory; the coherence of the system is to be found in legislative direction. State v. King, 330 A.2d 124, 127-28 (Me. 1974); see State v. Essay On Racial Struggles Throughout Society! Benner, 553 A.2d 219, 220 (Me.1989) (The power of punishment is vested in the legislative, not in the judicial department. It is the legislature, not the court, which is to define a crime and ordain its punishment. (quotation marks omitted)). ? 23 We have described the test for determining when a sentence is cruel and unusual as whether it is greatly disproportionate. . Orange Stain! . and whether it offends prevailing notions of decency, Worthley, 2003 ME 14, ? 6, 815 A.2d at 376; whether it shocks the conscience of the public, or our own respective or collective sense of kaizen foam uk, fairness, State v. Orange Juice Stain! Reardon, 486 A.2d 112, 121 (Me.1984); or whether it is act section, inhuman or barbarous, State v. Heald, 307 A.2d 188, 192 (Me.1973). Because the Legislature is the voice of the sovereign people, King, 330 A.2d at 127, and juice thus expresses the peoples will, only the most extreme punishment decided upon by that body as appropriate for an offense could so offend or shock the collective conscience of the people of Maine as to be unconstitutionally disproportionate, or cruel and unusual.11 In short, our system of government assumes that the in black by susan hill, judgment of the does orange juice stain, Legislature is the by susan, collective judgment of the people.

? 24 Gilman was convicted of a Class C crime, punishable by a maximum of five years imprisonment. See 17-A M.R.S. ? 1252(2)(C) (2009). The Legislature mandated a sentence for his conduct of two years, or forty percent of the maximum. Orange! 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2XD). It deemed that penalty necessary to prevent revoked drivers with three recent OUI convictions, who have repeatedly proved. that they are willing to endanger others by operating a motor vehicle while impaired, from continuing to drive under any circumstances. Kaizen Foam Uk! A mandated sentence for that conduct on the lower end of the does orange stain, zero-to-five-years scale is not the rare, extreme, or shocking case, and does not violate the proportionality requirement of article I, section 9. C. Equal Protection. ? 25 Gilman contends that, because he was not impaired when he was stopped for speeding, the Legislature had no rational basis for increasing his sentence for operating after revocation because of his prior OUI convictions.

He acknowledges that in order to reach the result he seeks, we would be required to kaizen foam uk overrule our decision in orange stain, State v. Chapin, where the same argument was advanced and rejected. Children! 610 A.2d 259, 261 (Me.1992). ? 26 In Chapin, we concluded that the danger created by drunk drivers was certainly strong enough to justify the imposition of does orange juice stain, a minimum mandatory sentence for habitual offenders with OUI convictions who continue to drive. Id. Gilman makes no showing that that danger has been reduced since 1992, when Chapin was decided, and we find that the rational relationship of prior OUI convictions to an enhanced sentence for operating after revocation remains intact.

? 27 Gilman next contends, on kaizen foam uk, the authority of State v. Stade, 683 A.2d 164, that because his license had been revoked, the State was required to individually notify him that the minimum statutory penalties for orange stain operating after revocationM had increased with the the woman in black, enactment of 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A. See P.L. 2005, ch. 606, ? A-11 (effective Aug. 23, 2006). ? 28 In Stade, we held that a defendants due process rights may be violated when an agent of the State makes affirmative misrepresentations that are then relied upon to the defendants detriment. 683 A.2d at 166. Here the State did not make any affirmative misrepresentation as to the penalties Gilman would face if he chose to drive and does orange juice stain thus knowingly violated the Struggles the History of American Society, law. The Legislature changed the statute, the Governor signed it into law, and Gilman is presumed to know what the law is. See Houghton v. Juice Stain! Hughes, 108 Me. 233, 236-37, 79 A. 909 (1911).

Contrary to Gilmans argument, due process did not require that he be individually notified of the change in order to ensure that he could conduct a thoughtful cost/benefit analysis before consciously choosing to break the law. Moreover, the law in children act section 17, effect at the time of his most recent OUI conviction provided that he could be sentenced to as long as five years in prison for the operation of any vehicle before his license was restored. Orange Stain! See 17-A M.R.S. ? 1252(2)(C); 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557(2)(B)(2) (2005).12. E. Isabella For Measure! Confrontation Clause. ? 29 Gilman finally contends that his Sixth Amendment right to does juice confront the witnesses against him was violated when the Superior Court admitted, over his objection, a certified record from the Secretary of State stating that his privilege to kaizen foam uk operate had been revoked, that he had received proper notice of the revocation, and orange stain that he had three OUI convictions within the preceding ten years. As. with his equal protection challenge, Gilman acknowledges that he can prevail only if we overrule recent precedent, specifically State v. Tayman, 2008 ME 177, 960 A.2d 1151. In Tayman, we held that a disputed Secretary of State certification did not offend the Confrontation Clause because the certification served only to confirm the authenticity of the underlying records of the vodafone, Violations Bureau, which themselves contain only orange routine, nontestimonial information. 2008 ME 177, ? 24, 960 A.2d at 1158; see also State v. Knight, 2009 ME 32, ? 10, 967 A.2d 723, 725 (relying on in black by susan, Tayman).

? 30 Gilman contends that Tayman must be overruled on the authority of the does orange juice stain, Supreme Courts decision in measure for measure, Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 2527, 174 L.Ed.2d 314 (2009). In Melendez-Diaz, the does stain, Court held that the admission of a chemists certificate stating that an analyzed substance was cocaine violated the Sixth Amendment, because although documents kept in the regular course of business may ordinarily be admitted at trial despite their hearsay status. . . that is not the case if the regularly conducted business activity is the production of evidence for use at trial. Id. at 2538, 174 L.Ed.2d at 328 (citation omitted). ? 31 We recently analyzed the impact of Melendez-Diaz on Tayman and concluded that Tayman remains good law. Deontological Ethics! State v. Murphy, 2010 ME 28, ? 26, 991 A.2d 35, 43. Tayman controls the result here and consequently Gilmans argument fails.

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Sentence vacated; remanded to the Superior Court for resentencing. 1 The statute provided: D. Does Orange! A person is guilty of a Class C crime if the person commits the crime of operating after habitual offender revocation and: (2) The person has 3 or more convictions for violating section 2411 Criminal OUI or former Title 29, section 1312-B within the previous 10 years. The minimum fine for a Class C crime under this paragraph is $1,000 and the minimum term of imprisonment is 2 years, neither of which may be suspended by the court. 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D) (2008). The statute has since been amended, though not in any way that affects this case. P.L.

2009, ch. 54, ? 5 (effective April 22, 2009) (codified at 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D)(2) (2009)). 2 Gilman does not specify whether his due process and equal protection claims are grounded in the United States or Maine Constitutions. In any event, those protections are coextensive. See Conlogue v. Kaizen Foam Uk! Conlogue, 2006 ME 12, ? 6, 890 A.2d 691, 694 (citing cases). 3 The statute has since been amended, though not in any way that affects this case. P.L. 2009, ch. Orange Juice Stain! 54, ? 5 (effective April 22, 2009) (codified at Struggles Throughout, 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(A) (2009)).

4 The Rule provides: On motion of the . . . Juice! attorney for the state . . . made within one year after a sentence is imposed, the justice or judge who imposed sentence may correct an illegal sentence or a sentence imposed in an illegal manner. M.R.Crim. Hill! P. 35(a). 5 At oral argument, Gilman suggested that the does, minimum mandatory sentence for isabella measure for measure his offense must also be proportional in context, that is, it must be proportionate not only to his specific crime, but also to the sentences imposed by the Legislature for other crimes. We find no support for his contention that we must place crimes and penalties on a continuum before deciding whether a particular penalty is constitutional, and we do not address this argument further. 6 Although the does orange juice, Maine Constitution, unlike the United States Constitution, delineates the protections against disproportionate punishments and cruel or unusual punishments separately, both the Supreme Court and this Court have understood them to Essay on Racial Struggles of American Society be related. See Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct.

2641, 171 L.Ed.2d 525, 538 (2008) (The Eighth Amendment proscribes all excessive punishments, as well as cruel and unusual punishments that may or may not be excessive. . . . The Eighth Amendments protection . Does Juice Stain! . The Woman Hill! . flows from the does, basic precept of justice that punishment for a crime should be graduated and proportioned to the offense. (quotation marks omitted)); State v. Worthley, 2003 ME 14, ? 6, 815 A.2d 375, 376 (In analyzing whether a sentence is cruel and unusual as applied, we look to whether the kaizen foam uk, sentence is greatly disproportionate to does juice stain the offense and whether it offends prevailing notions of decency.); State v. Frye, 390 A.2d 520, 521 (Me. 1978) (A mandatory sentence is not cruel and unusual punishment unless the sentence is greatly disproportionate to the offense or the punishment offends prevailing notions of on Racial Struggles the History of American Society, decency); Tinkle, The Maine State Constitution: A Reference Guide (1992) at orange stain, 43 (The interpretation of `cruel or unusual punishment also is informed by the requirement of proportionality.). 7 See Worthley, 2003 ME 14, ? 6, 815 A.2d at 376-77 (holding minimum mandatory sentence for OUI not disproportionate or cruel and unusual); State v. Vanassche, 566 A.2d 1077, 1080-81 (Me.1989) (holding forty-eight hour mandatory sentence for OUI with blood-alcohol level of 0.15% or more not disproportionate to the crime); State v. Frye, 390 A.2d 520, 521 (Me. 1978) (holding mandatory four-year sentence for by susan robbery with a firearm not disproportionate to the offense); State v. Briggs, 388 A.2d 507, 508 (Me. 1978) (holding mandatory $500 fine for does juice night hunting not excessive); State v. King, 330 A.2d 124, 125, 127 (Me.1974) (holding minimum mandatory sentence for sale of amphetamine not disproportionate and the woman thus not cruel and does orange unusual); State v. Farmer, 324 A.2d 739, 745-46 (Me. 1974) (holding minimum mandatory two-year sentence for armed assault not cruel and unusual); State v. Lubee, 93 Me. 418, 45 A. For Measure! 520 (1899) (holding fine for short lobsters not unconstitutionally excessive and value of orange juice stain, lobsters in particular case irrelevant); c.f. Essay On Racial Struggles Throughout The History Of American Society! State v. Juice Stain! Alexander, 257 A.2d 778, 783 (Me.

1969) (holding five-day sentence imposed by ethics kant, court in its discretion for contemptuous reprehensible conduct not excessive or cruel or unusual). 8 See Kennedy, 554 U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. Stain! 2641, 171 L.Ed.2d at 540 (holding death penalty for non-fatal rape of a child violates Eighth Amendment); Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. Kant! 551, 568, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) (holding death penalty for juveniles under age eighteen violates Eighth Amendment); Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11, 17-18, 30-31, 123 S.Ct. 1179, 155 L.Ed.2d 108 (2003) (holding sentence of twenty-five years to life for stealing three golf clubs under three strikes law not grossly disproportionate and therefore not cruel and unusual); Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S.

304, 321, 122 S.Ct. Orange Stain! 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002) (holding death penalty for mentally retarded offenders violates Eighth Amendment); Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 961, 995-96, 111 S.Ct. 2680, 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991) (holding mandatory sentence of life without parole for possessing 672 grams of cocaine not cruel and unusual). 9 In felony cases where the applicable statute does not specify a mandatory sentence, the children act section, sentencing court first determines a basic sentence considering the nature and does orange stain seriousness of the crime as committed, then considers aggravating and/or mitigating factors to arrive at a maximum sentence that may be higher or lower than the basic sentence, and finally determines whether any of the maximum sentence should be suspended in arriving at a final sentence.

17-A M.R.S. ? 1252-C. 10 For defendants such as Gilman who assert that a mandatory sentence is too harsh as applied, the by susan, Maine Constitution gives the Governor the equitable power to grant reprieves, commutations and pardons in individual cases. Me. Does Stain! Const. Vodafone Sales Number! art. V, pt.

1, ? 11. 11 Discussing what would qualify as disproportionate under the Eighth Amendment, the does, Supreme Court used the hypothetical example of a legislature making overtime parking a felony punishable by sales number, life imprisonment. Ewing, 538 U.S. at 21, 123 S.Ct. 1179 (plurality opinion) (quotation marks omitted). 12 Title 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557 was repealed and replaced by P.L. 2005, ch. 606, ?? A-10, A-11 (effective Aug. 23, 2006) (codified at 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A (2008)). The indictment against Gilman alleged that his most recent OUI conviction occurred on October 14, 2005.

Gautiers conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) subjects him to the enhancement provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act. 590 F.Supp.2d 214. UNITED STATES of America, Eddie GAUTIER, Defendant. Criminal No.

06cr0036-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 23, 2008. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

Oscar Cruz, Jr., Timothy G. Watkins, Federal Defenders Office District of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, for does orange stain Eddie Gautier. William D. Weinreb, United States Attorneys Office, John A. Kant! Wortmann, Jr., United States Attorneys Office, Boston, MA, for United States of America. GERTNER, District Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS. A. Does Orange Juice! Whether Gautiers 2001 Crime of Resisting Arrest under Mass. Act Section! Gen. 1. Orange Juice! Whether the Crime Defined by sales, Prong (2) of orange stain, 32B Is a Violent. 2. For Measure! Whether the Crime Defined by Prong (2) of 32B Is a Violent. B. Does Orange Juice! Whether the kaizen foam uk, 1998 Juvenile Offenses Were Committed on Different. 2. Whether the Inquiry Is Limited, to Shepard-approved Source. Three years ago, Boston police found a badly rusted gun and ammunition in the pocket of defendant Eddie Gautier (Gautier) one night in Roxbury.

The offense stemmed from a night of drunken carousing; the gun was completely inoperable.1 Though he was originally arrested by stain, state officers, possession of an inoperable gun did not constitute a crime under state law. Kaizen Foam Uk! The federal government took up the case, charging Gautier with being a felon in possession of a firearm, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Orange Juice Stain! 922(g)(1), because of children, his prior record. Orange Juice Stain! His prior convictions include two armed robberies from isabella for measure 1998, when he was 16, and a resisting arrest charge from 2001, when he was 20. (He is presently 27.) The Guideline sentencing range for Gautier, assuming a guilty plea, was 57-71 months. But the does orange stain, government wanted more punishment for in black by susan hill Gautier. Does Juice Stain! It contended that these convictions compelled the children, application of a fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). Does Orange Juice! See 924(e) (applying the kaizen foam uk, penalty to defendants with at least three previous convictions for violent felonies committed on separate occasions). I disagree.

In passing the ACCA, Congress focused its efforts on does, career offenders those who commit a large number of fairly serious crimes as their means of livelihood, and who, because they possess weapons, present at least a potential threat of harm to persons. Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 587-88, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). Gautiers criminal history consists of six episodes over ten years; two occurred when he was 16 and sales number two others were marijuana offenses.2 The. predicate offenses for the ACCA enhancement are the two serious juvenile offenses, and resisting.

After two rounds of juice, briefing and two sentencing hearings, I found that Gautier is not an measure armed career criminal under the terms of the statute. First, his resisting arrest conviction does not constitute a violent felony within the meaning of the ACCA. Second, and in does orange juice stain, the alternative, court records were ambiguous on the question of whether his 1998 offenses were committed on occasions different from one another as the isabella, statute requires. As a result, Gautier lacks the requisite three predicate offenses and the mandatory minimum does not apply. Accordingly, I sentenced Gautier to 57 months incarceration, in effect the Guideline felon in possession sentence, and three years supervised release, with a number of special requirements. This memorandum reflects the factual and legal bases for that sentence. On the night of January 6, 2006, Eddie Gautier had come to orange stain the Archdale Housing Project to visit his mother. He decided to meet four friends who were out celebrating two of their birthdays. About 10:30 p.m., two Boston police officers patrolling the Archdale Housing Project in deontological ethics kant, an unmarked police car approached the group. One of Gautiers friends, Salome Cabrera, peered into the vehicle and made movements toward his waistband.

The officers exited the car, badges displayed, and walked to Cabrera. Cabrera then allegedly shouted get the burner (slang for gun), a comment Gautier claimed he did not hear, and the police responded by drawing their weapons on the group. They arrested and searched all five, finding a .38 caliber gun loaded with three rounds of ammunition in Gautiers jacket pocket. An examination later revealed that the gun was completely inoperable.3. Gautier was transferred to federal custody on February 8, 2006, and indicted on February 15, 2006, on one count of felon in possession of a firearm and one count of felon in possession of does stain, ammunition, both pursuant to sales number 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1). Orange Juice! Subsequent to in black hill his arrest, he agreed to speak to does federal agents and police investigators, admitted to deontological ethics kant possessing the gun, and divulged where it had come from. Indeed, according to his counsel, the defendant repeatedly offered to plead guilty to the charge, but was advised against it because of the possibility of an ACCA minimum mandatory sentence of does orange juice stain, 15 years. Counsel for Gautier sought a pre-plea Pre Sentence Report (PSR). When the pre-plea PSR concluded that an ACCA enhancement was required, the defendant felt obliged to go to ethics kant trial. At trial, he fully admitted that he possessed a firearm and that he had a prior felony conviction. His defense was that he had picked up the gun and held it momentarily, to keep it from a group of does juice, younger, intoxicated friends in a dangerous area of vodafone number, Boston.

The jury rejected his claim, convicting him of both counts on juice stain, July 18, 2008. He has been incarcerated since his arrest on January 6, 2006. At the first sentencing hearing on in black by susan hill, October 15, I asked the government to brief whether resisting arrest qualifies as an ACCA predicate, an issue raised in the defendants objections to does orange stain the presentence report. Children Act Section! On that date, I also raised sua sponte the issue of whether the juvenile. offenses Gautier committed in does juice stain, 1998 were clearly separate predicates. At the final sentencing hearing on December 15, 2008, after reviewing the parties submissions, I concluded that the ACCA enhancement was not warranted, principally because of the resisting arrest conviction but based on alternative findings concerning the on Racial Throughout Society, two 1998 convictions, as well.

Gautiers conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) subjects him to the enhancement provision of the juice stain, Armed Career Criminal Act. That statute provides: In the case of a person who violates section 922(g) of this title and has three previous convictions by vodafone, any court referred to in section 922(g)(1) of this title for a violent felony or a serious drug offense, or both, committed on occasions different from one another, such person shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than fifteen years. 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(1). Gautiers sentencing memorandum and recent Supreme Court decisions raise two potential obstacles to juice stain the applicability of the the woman in black, sentencing enhancement: First, Gautiers conviction for resisting arrest may not be a violent felony under the does orange stain, ACCA. Second, the government may have difficulty establishing, on the basis of source material deemed appropriate by the Supreme Court, that the 1998 offenses were committed on occasions different from one another. A. Whether Gautiers 2001 Crime of Resisting Arrest under Mass.

Gen. Laws Ch. 268, 32B Is a Violent Felony. The ACCA defines violent felony as any crime punishable for a term exceeding one year that (i) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against in black by susan the person of another; or (ii) is burglary, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B). Courts are obliged to apply a categorical approach to juice determining whether a criminal offense is Essay Struggles Throughout the History Society, a violent felony; that is, they look to the statutory definition of the prior offense and not to the facts underlying the conviction. See Taylor, 495 U.S. at 600, 602, 110 S.Ct. 2143.

Put simply, the does juice, issue is what the children 17, defendant was convicted of, or what he pled to, or what he admitted in the sentencing proceeding, not what he actually did. Does Orange Stain! United States v. Shepard, 181 F.Supp.2d 14, 16 (D.Mass.2002).4 Where such a substantial enhancement is involved. as with the ACCA, the case law expressly cautions courts against engaging in a post hoc archeological dig of the woman in black by susan, prior convictions to determine what really happened. Problems of interpretation arise when a state statute on which the predicate charge was based encompasses both violent felonies, which may qualify for ACCA treatment, and nonviolent felonies, which do not. Does Stain! In such a case, while the sentencing judge may not hold a minitrial on the particular facts underlying the prior offense, see United States v. Dueno, 171 F.3d 3, 5 (1st Cir.1999) (citing United States v. Damon, 127 F.3d 139, 144 (1st Cir.1997); United States v. Meader, 118 F.3d 876, 882 (1st Cir.1997)), he or she may peek beneath the coverlet of the formal language to ascertain whether the Essay Throughout the History of American Society, conviction was for a violent or a nonviolent crime, see United States v. Winter, 22 F.3d 15, 18 (1st Cir.1994). The question, now unequivocally answered by the Supreme Court in Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005), is how far that peek can go. Not very far, is the does orange, answer. United States v. Children Act Section 17! Shepard, 125 F.Supp.2d 562, 569 (D.Mass.2000) (citing Taylor, 495 U.S. at 600-02, 110 S.Ct. 2143; Damon, 127 F.3d at does juice stain, 142-46.) If the defendant was convicted after a trial, the court is permitted to consider what the jury instructions suggested about the verdict. When a defendants conviction resulted from a guilty plea rather than trial, those sources include the kaizen foam uk, charging document, the plea agreement, a transcript of the plea colloquy, any facts confirmed by the defendant at sentencing, and stain any comparable judicial record.

See Shepard, 544 U.S. at 26, 125 S.Ct. 1254. Finally, if the relevant facts contained in the PSR are uncontested, the ethics kant, court may consider these as further admissions by the defendant. See Dueno, 171 F.3d at 7; United States v. Juice! Harris, 964 F.2d 1234,1236-37 (1st Cir.1992). Defendant claims that the Massachusetts resisting arrest statute embodies both violent and nonviolent offenses and, further, that nothing in the record of Gautiers 2002 plea to the charge establishes that the plea was to the violent version of the felony. Under the Essay Society, Massachusetts statute, a person is guilty of the offense if he knowingly prevents or attempts to prevent an officer from effecting an arrest by (1) using or threatening to use physical force or violence against the police officer or another; or (2) using any other means which creates a substantial risk of does, causing bodily injury to such police officer or another. Mass. Gen. Laws ch.

268, 32B(a). The government correctly points out that Prong (1) of this definition clearly defines an ACCA violent felony, as it has as an isabella for measure element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another. 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B)(i); see Govt Sent. Mem. 3 (document # 62). Prong (2) of the does orange juice stain, resisting arrest statute, however, does not. Importantly, there exists no tape or transcript of Gautiers colloquy, no plea agreement, and no other record indicating which type of resisting arrest Gautier admitted. While the PSR reviewed the police report of the offense, Gautier did not adopt the facts as true. Rather, he interposed a Shepard challenge to any peek at the underlying facts not comprised by the plea colloquy. Accordingly, as in children 17, Shepard, the criminal complaint to which Gautier pleaded is the only extant evidence I may consider, and it simply lists the offense and provides its full statutory definition.5 As there is no evidence that Gautier specifically pleaded guilty to the Prong (1) version of resisting arrest and as the. statute is structured in the disjunctive, the government must establish that Prong (2) defines a violent felony under the ACCA.

It cannot. 1. Whether the Crime Defined by Prong (2) of 32B Is a Violent Felony Under 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B)(i) By its own terms, the Prong (2) definition of resisting arrest does not qualify as a violent felony under the does, first definition laid out in the ACCA. That is, the language using any other means which creates a substantial risk of causing bodily injury to such police officer or another, Mass Gen. Laws. ch. 268, 32B(a), does not explicitly ha[ve] as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, 18 U.S.C. Kaizen Foam Uk! 924(e)(2)(B)(i). Moreover, the orange, fact that the Prong (1) definition of resisting arrest does contain such an element, coupled with Prong (2)s specification of resistance by other means, suggests that Prong (2) does not involve such an element by implication, either. 2. Whether the Crime Defined by Prong (2) of 32B Is a Violent Felony Under 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B)(ii)

If Prong (2) of the for measure, Massachusetts resisting arrest statute defines a violent felony for does orange the armed career criminal mandatory minimum, it must do so under the second definition provided by the ACCA. Since resisting arrest is obviously not one of the enumerated offensesburglary, arson, extortion, or a crime that involves the use of explosivesthe inquiry focuses on what has been called the residual clause of the the woman by susan, ACCA statute. Does Juice! See James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 1591, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007). The issue is whether resisting arrest using any other means which creates a substantial risk of causing bodily injury to vodafone sales such police officer or another, in orange juice stain, the language of the Massachusetts statute, Mass. Gen. Kaizen Foam Uk! Laws. ch. 268, 32B, involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to orange juice stain another, in the language of the ACCA, 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). At first pass, the question seems to answer itself, but the Supreme Court has required more than a textual comparison of the criminal statute and the ACCA under the residual clause.

In Begay v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1581, 170 L.Ed.2d 490 (2008), in which the Supreme Court ruled that drunk driving was not a violent felony under the ACCA, Justice Breyer described a twostep process for determining whether a conviction is a violent felony under the residual provision of deontological ethics kant, 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). Where the offense in question is not one of those enumerated in the statute, a court must determine not only (1) whether that offense involves conduct that presents a serious risk of physical injury to another, but also (2) whether the crime is roughly similar, in kind as well as in orange, degree of risk posed, to the enumerated offenses. Id. at 1585. The latter step is critical here. Number! It requires a court to stain decide whether the offense in question typically involves purposeful, violent, and vodafone sales number aggressive behaviorthe defining feature of the enumerated offenses. The Court based the Begay test on the text of the ACCA, its legislative history, and its underlying purpose. As to text, the juice, court noted that the presence of the sales, enumerated offenses of burglary, arson, extortion and crimes involving explosives indicates that the statute covers only orange juice similar crimes, rather than every crime that `presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. Id. The Woman Hill! Had Congress intended the statute to cover all crimes creating serious risk of injury, it would have omitted the examples. As to history, the Court noted that in 1986 Congress rejected a broad proposal that would have covered every [such] offense. Id. at 1586.

Finally, the Court noted that this interpretation served the stain, ACCAs purpose of kaizen foam uk, punish[ing] only a particular subset of offender, namely career criminals. Id. at 1588: The listed crimes all typically involve purposeful, violent, and aggressive conduct. Does! That conduct is such that it makes [it] more likely that an offender, later possessing a gun, will use that gun deliberately to harm a victim. Were we to the woman in black hill read the statute without this distinction, its 15-year mandatory minimum sentence would apply to a host of crimes which, though dangerous, are not typically committed by those whom one normally labels armed career criminals. Id. at 1586-87 (citations omitted). In Begay, the Court assumed without deciding that drunk driving involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. Id. at 1584. Even so, it held under the second step of the analysis that a conviction for driving under the influence (DUI) falls outside the scope of the residual clause because [i]t is simply too unlike the provisions listed examples for us to believe that Congress intended the provision to cover it. Id. at 1584. Moreover, the Supreme Court has held that in conducting this analysis, courts need not analyze every conceivable factual offense covered by a statute, but rather should consider the ordinary case of the orange stain, offense. James, 127 S.Ct. at by susan, 1597. In the words of the First Circuit, I must evaluate the degree of risk posed by the mine-run of conduct that falls within the does orange, heartland of the statute. United States v. De Jesus, 984 F.2d 21, 24 (1st Cir.1993); see also United States v. Vodafone Sales Number! Doe, 960 F.2d 221, 224-25 (1st Cir.1992) (holding that the crime of being a felon in possession of a firearm is not a violent felony under the does, ACCA because risk of physical harm does not often accompany[] the conduct that normally constitutes the offense); United States v. Sacko, 178 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1999) (approving the district courts understanding that it had to consider whats the typical, usual type of conduct constituting statutory rape); Damon, 127 F.3d at 143 (holding that aggravated criminal mischief is a crime of violence if and only if a serious potential risk of physical injury to another is a `normal, usual, or customary concomitant of the predicate offense); Winter, 22 F.3d at 20 (A categorical approach is not concerned with testing either the outer limits of statutory language or the myriad of possibilities girdled by that language; instead, a categorical approach is concerned with the usual type of conduct that the statute purports to isabella measure for measure proscribe.). To determine the mine-run of conduct encompassed by Prong (2) of the resisting arrest statute, I examine its application in the Massachusetts state courts.

There have been relatively few cases interpreting that part of the statute. In Commonwealth v. Grandison, 433 Mass. 135, 741 N.E.2d 25 (2001), the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the defendants stiffening his arms and pulling one away for a second to orange stain avoid being handcuffed constituted resisting arrest by a means which creates a substantial risk of causing bodily injury to the officers involved. Id. at 144-45, 741 N.E.2d 25. In Commonwealth v. Maylott, 65 Mass.App.Ct. 466, 841 N.E.2d 717 (2006), an intermediate appellate court likewise held that a defendant resisted arrest under Prong (2) when he stiffened his arms and refused to vodafone sales number put his hands behind his back.6 Id. at 468-69, 841 N.E.2d 717. Orange Stain! In another case, a state court declined to. decide whether flight over fences without physical resistance constitutes resisting arrest under Prong (2) of the statutory definition. Commonwealth v. Measure For Measure! Grant, 71 Mass.

App.Ct. 205, 210 n. 2, 880 N.E.2d 820 (2008). These cases indicate that while Prong (1) of the resisting arrest statute covers the actual or threatened use of force, the mine-run of conduct criminalized by juice stain, Prong (2) involves a lesser version of number, active, physical refusal to submit to the authority of the arresting officers: paradigmatically, the stiffening of ones arms to resist handcuffing. Maylott, 65 Mass.App. Juice Stain! Ct. at 469, 841 N.E.2d 717.7. Under the first prong of the Begay analysis, I must determine whether the Prong (2) definition of resisting arrest presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. Stiffening ones arms to prevent handcuffing, the usual conduct prosecuted under Prong (2), sometimes does and sometimes does not present a serious risk of vodafone, injury, and at least one court has suggested this inconsistency as a ground for finding that a criminal offense fails to satisfy this part of the test. See United States v. Urbano, No.

07-10160-01-MLB, 2008 WL 1995074, at *2 (D.Kan. Does Juice! May 6, 2008) (holding on these grounds that fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer in a motor vehicle is not a violent felony for ACCA purposes) (While an individual can, and of American Society often does, cause serious personal injury or death while attempting to flee from the police, the statute also charges behavior which would arguably not cause serious personal injury.). In Grandison, however, the Supreme Judicial Court explained that resisting being handcuffed, and particularly pulling ones arm free, is [t]he type of resistance [that] could have caused one of the officers to be struck or otherwise injured, especially at the moment [the defendant] freed his arm. 433 Mass. at 145, 741 N.E.2d 25. Even assuming arguendo that the conduct typically prosecuted under Prong (2) of the resisting arrest statute presents a serious potential risk of injury to another, that form of resisting arrest cannot fulfill the second part of the Begay test. The crime is not roughly similar, in juice stain, kind as well as in for measure, degree of risk posed, to the enumerated offenses. Begay, 128 S.Ct. at 1585. First, looking to the degree of risk: Even if the orange stain, Grandison court is deontological, correct that stiffening ones arms and pulling away present a serious risk of harm to another, the degree of that risk does not approach that posed by burglary, arson, extortion, or crime involving use of explosives. The Supreme Court has explained that burglary presents a high risk of does juice, violence due to for measure the possibility of a face-to-face confrontation between the burglar and a third party who comes to investigate. James, 127 S.Ct. at 1594; see also United States v. Winn, 364 F.3d 7, 11 (1st Cir.2004) (describing this as the powder keg rationale). The element of surprise that spooks a burglar into personal violence is not present where police are already in the process of arresting a suspect.8 It is. measurably less likely that injury will result from the orange juice stain, stiffening of ones arms than that it will result from a burglary, the setting of a structure on fire, unlawfully demanding property or services through threat of harm, or the detonation of explosive devices.9.

Second, looking to deontological kant the in kind test, whether Prong (2) resistance is similar in kind to the enumerated offenses: This inquiry requires me to determine whether the offense involves purposeful, violent, and aggressive behavior. In Begay, the Court held that drunk driving does not fulfill the test because the juice, offender does not possess the purpose or intentional aggression that characterizes the enumerated offenses. 128 S.Ct. at 1586-87 ([S]tatutes that forbid driving under the act section 17, influence criminaliz[e] conduct in stain, respect to isabella which the offender need not have had any criminal intent at all.); see also United States v. Gray, 535 F.3d 128, 131-32 (2d Cir.2008) (holding that reckless endangerment is juice stain, not a crime of violence because it is not intentional). But as the First Circuit recognized in measure for measure, United States v. Williams, 529 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.2008), some crimes fall neither within the safe harbor of offenses with limited scienter requirements and uncertain consequences (like DUI ), nor among those that have deliberate violence as a necessary element or even as an does orange almost inevitable concomitant. Id. at 7 (citation omitted). Prong (2) resistance is such a crime. The First Circuit recently explained that all three types of conducti.e., purposeful, violent and aggressiveare necessary for a predicate crime to qualify as a `violent felony under ACCA. United States v. Herrick, 545 F.3d 53, 58-59 (1st Cir.2008). The court also provided more precise meanings for those characteristics. It explained: The Supreme Court use[d] purposeful interchangeably with intentional. [Begay, 128 S.Ct.] at 1587-88. Perhaps because it is common sense that a DUI is not violent or aggressive in children act section 17, an ordinary sense, the Supreme Court did not define those terms or explain in other than conclusory terms why a DUI was not violent or aggressive. We note, therefore, that aggressive may be defined as tending toward or exhibiting aggression, which in turn is defined as a forceful action or procedure (as an orange juice stain unprovoked attack) esp. when intended to dominate or master. Merriam-Websters Collegiate Dictionary 24 (11th ed. 2003).

Violence may be defined as marked by extreme force or sudden intense activity. Id. at 58. Applying these definitions, the court held that a conviction under a Wisconsin statute for kaizen foam uk homicide by negligent operation of a motor vehicle was not a crime of violence under the does stain, career offender sentencing guidelines.10 Id. at kaizen foam uk, 59. While the offense undoubtedly presented a serious potential risk of potential injury to. another, it was not purposeful or aggressive enough to orange juice be similar in kind to the enumerated offenses. Id. A similar conclusion obtains here.

To be sure, the for measure, Prong (2) form of resisting arrest is purposeful in that a defendant who stiffens or pulls away his arm certainly intends to orange juice do so (though he may not intend to expose others to risk of deontological ethics, injury). It is differently purposeful, however, from the interstate transport of a minor for prostitution, which the First Circuit held in Williams constituted a crime of violence under the career offender provision of the sentencing guidelines. 529 F.3d at 7-8. A defendant who prostitutes minors is aware of the risks that the prostituted minor will face and the risk of harm is easily foreseen by the defendant, id. at orange juice stain, 7; a defendant who stiffens his arm to children act section avoid handcuffing exhibits no such intent or clairvoyance that harm will result to those around him. Moreover, Prong (2) resistance cannot be said to approach the aggression or violence of the enumerated offenses. See, e.g., Taylor, 495 U.S. at orange stain, 581, 110 S.Ct. 2143 (noting that Congress considered burglary one of the `most damaging crimes to society because it involves invasion of [victims'] homes or workplaces, violation of their privacy, and loss of deontological ethics kant, their most personal and does orange juice valued possessions (quoting H.R.Rep. No.

98-1073, at the woman in black, 1, 3, 1984 U.S.Code Cong. Does Stain! #038; Admin.News 3661, 3663)). Arm-stiffening is not characterized by the force or domination impulse that the the woman in black by susan hill, First Circuit has held defines aggression, and it lacks the extreme force and does sudden intenseness required by the courts definition of violence. See Herrick, 545 F.3d at ethics, 60. Nor does it resemble those offenses previously held by the First Circuit and the district courts in its jurisdiction to constitute violent felonies or crimes of violence under the residual clause. See United States v. Walter, 434 F.3d 30 (1st Cir.2006) (manslaughter); United States v. Sherwood, 156 F.3d 219 (1st Cir.1998) (child molestation); United States v. Fernandez, 121 F.3d 777 (1st Cir.1997) (assault and battery on does orange stain, a police officer); United States v. Schofield, 114 F.3d 350 (1st Cir.1997) (breaking and entering a commercial or public building); United States v. Kaizen Foam Uk! De Jesus, 984 F.2d 21 (1st Cir.1993) (larceny from does stain a person); United States v. Fiore, 983 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1992) (breaking and entering a commercial or public building); United States v. The Woman In Black! Patterson, 882 F.2d 595 (1st Cir.1989) (unauthorized entry of the premises of another); United States v. Does! Cadieux, 350 F.Supp.2d 275 (D.Me.2004) (indecent assault and battery on in black hill, a child under 14); United States v. Sanford, 327 F.Supp.2d 54 (D.Me.2004) (assault and battery); Mooney v. United States, 2004 WL 1571643 (D.Me. Apr. 30, 2004) (breaking and entering a commercial building); United States v. Lepore, 304 F.Supp.2d 183, 189 (D.Mass.2004) (indecent assault and battery on a person over orange juice stain, 14 years old).

And those cases predated Begay, when the kaizen foam uk, standard for finding an offense to be a violent felony was easier to does stain satisfy. In light of the difference in aggression and violence between resisting arrest and the offenses previously held to be ACCA predicates, Prong (2) resistance does not resemble the enumerated offenses in the `way or manner in which it produces risk of injury. Vodafone! Begay, 128 S.Ct. at 1586. To be sure, some courtsincluding within this districthave found that resisting arrest is an ACCA predicate, but all of these cases predate Begay.11 Begay. charted a new course in interpreting the critical violent felony definition of the juice, Armed Career Criminal Act. Williams, 529 F.3d at 6. Significantly, in deontological ethics, a recent post-Begay case in this court, Judge Zobel rejected the governments contention that a prior conviction under the Massachusetts resisting arrest statute constituted a crime of does orange juice stain, violence under the career offender guidelines. United States v. Kristopher Gray, No. 07-10337-RWZ, 2008 WL 2563378 (D.Mass. Jun. 24, 2008) (sentencing defendant without written opinion to twenty-four months imprisonment for conviction under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)). In another post-Begay case on resisting arrest, the U.S.

District Court for the District of Kansas held that the crime of fleeing and eluding an officer is not a crime of for measure, violence because the statute also charges behavior which would arguably not cause serious personal injury and because resisting arrest is not similar to the listed crimes set forth in 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). Urbano, 2008 WL 1995074, at juice stain, *2. Importantly, the district court so held despite the isabella measure for measure, existence of a 2005 precedent concluding that the resisting arrest was a crime of violence. Juice! The court explained its about-face as required by Begay. Id. at number, *2. In light of the Supreme Courts pronouncement in Begay, then, I find that the Prong (2) version of orange juice stain, resisting arrest is not a violent felony under the ACCA.

The usual conduct underlying a conviction under that definition involves the stiffening of ones arms, not the application of force to another. Even assuming that such conduct creates a serious potential risk of deontological ethics kant, physical injury, it certainly does not resemble the enumerated offenses either in degree of risk or in kind. The state court criminal complaint charges Gautier with the full definition of resisting arrest. Because the does juice, government cannot establish that he pleaded to Prong (1) rather than to Prong (2)as it must it cannot look to this conviction for a qualifying violent felony. Gautier has at most two statutory predicatestoo few to Essay Struggles trigger the fifteen-year mandatory minimum.

B. Whether the 1998 Juvenile Offenses Were Committed on Different Occasions. 1. Legal Standard. That Gautiers resisting arrest conviction is not a violent felony is enough to preclude the application of the ACCA enhancement. In the alternative, I find the enhancement is also flawed for a second reason: his 1998 juvenile offenses were not committed on occasions different from one another as required to constitute independent predicate offenses.12 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(1). The First Circuit has held that the `occasions inquiry requires a case-by-case examination of the totality of the circumstances. United States v. Stearns, 387 F.3d 104, 108 (1st Cir.2004). Factors in that examination include the identity of the victim; the type of crime; the time interval between the crimes; the location of the crimes; the continuity vel non of the orange juice, defendants conduct; and/or the apparent motive for the crimes. Id. As one would expect from Congress use of the isabella, word occasion, the First Circuit has focused on the element of time. The Stearns court summarized that the statute distinguishes between, on orange, the one hand, a time interval during which defendant successfully has completed his first crime, safely escaped, and which affords defendant a `breather, viz., a period (however brief) which is devoid of criminal activity and in vodafone, which he may contemplate whether or not to commit the second crime, and on the other, a time lapse which does not mark the endpoint of the first crime, but merely the natural consequence of a continuous course of extended criminal conduct.13 387 F.3d at 108 (defendant who burglarized the same warehouse on consecutive days had committed offenses on different occasions); see also United States v. Ramirez, No.

CR-05-71-B-W, 2007 WL 4571143, at does orange stain, *6 (D.Me. Dec. 21, 2007) (two robberies committed over five weeks apart against different victims in different locations occurred on different occasions); United States v. Mastera, 435 F.3d 56, 60 (1st Cir.2006) (stalking and breaking and entering occurred on different occasions because they were committed on consecutive days); United States v. Mollo, No. Kaizen Foam Uk! 97-1922, 1997 WL 781582, at *1 (1st Cir. Juice! Dec. 17, 1997) (per curiam) (defendant who robbed liquor store in Greenwich and children thirty minutes later robbed variety store in Stamford had committed offenses on different occasions); Harris, 964 F.2d at 1237 (two assault and does orange juice stain battery offenses qualified as separate predicate offenses because they occurred two months apart, even though they involved the same victim and defendant was convicted and sentenced for both on the same day); United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 497 (1st Cir.1988) (armed robberies of kaizen foam uk, different drugstores on consecutive days occurred on different occasions for the purposes of the ACCA, even though defendant received concurrent sentences).

2. Whether the Inquiry Is Limited to Shepard-approved Source Material. Again, in order to apply the above legal standard to juice the facts of Gautiers prior felony convictions, I must answer an antecedent question: from what sources may I glean those facts? As explained above, the Supreme Court has directed courts to apply a categorical approach to kaizen foam uk determining whether a prior conviction qualifies as a violent felony and thus predicate offense under the ACCA. Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. Does Juice Stain! 575, 588, 110 S.Ct. The Woman Hill! 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). In the case of does juice stain, a guilty plea, the Court has limited district courts to the terms of the kant, charging document, the terms of a plea agreement or transcript of colloquy between judge and defendant in which the factual basis for the plea was confirmed by the defendant, or to some comparable judicial record of this information. Shepard, 544 U.S. at does orange stain, 26, 125 S.Ct. 1254. The issue I confront here is whether this same source restriction applies to vodafone number my consideration of whether two offenses were committed on occasions different from one another. 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(1). The First Circuit has never ruled on this issue. In a pre-Shepard case, the court express[ed] no opinion on does, the lower courts citation of Taylor for the proposition that district courts normally should not look beyond the indictment when determining whether a prior conviction is the type countable under the vodafone sales, ACCA. Stearns, 387 F.3d at 107.

In that case, the defendant sought an evidentiary hearing to develop his argument that two of his predicate offenses should be counted as occurring on one occasion. The district court interpreted Taylor to forbid such an involved inquiry and orange juice stain denied his motion, but because the defendant accepted the judges ruling without objection, the First Circuit held he could not raise the issue on appeal. In a post-Shepard case, United States v. Walter, 434 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 2006), the First Circuit again declined to resolve the issue. The defendant argued it was error for kaizen foam uk the district court to use facts gleaned from police reports and described in the PSR to find that two drug offenses disposed of on the same day were in fact committed on occasions different from juice one another. Id. at 38. The court of appeals opted not to address his argument, finding that even counting the contested offenses as one the defendant had enough predicates to trigger the ACCA. Id. at 40.

At least three circuit courts have held that the source restriction applies to the occasions inquiry. The Fourth Circuit held in United States v. Thompson, 421 F.3d 278 (4th Cir.2005), that the ACCAs use of the term `occasion requires recourse only to data normally found in conclusive judicial records, such as the children act section, date and location of an offense, upon which Taylor and Shepard say we may rely. Id. at 286 (upholding trial judges reliance on the PSR to find that three burglaries occurred on separate occasions where that information was derived from Shepard-approved sources such as indictments and where defendant never objected to the details in the PSR); see also United States v. Williams, 223 Fed.Appx. Juice! 280, 283 (4th Cir. 2007) (assuming that the occasions inquiry can be conducted by reference to Shepard-approved sources only). In United States v. Fuller, 453 F.3d 274 (5th Cir.2006), the Fifth Circuit vacated an ACCA enhancement where the court could not establish on the basis of deontological, Shepard-approved material that the predicate offenses were committed on different occasions. Id. at 279; see also United States v. Bookman, 197 Fed. Appx. 349, 350 (5th Cir.2006) (per curiam) (vacating defendants sentence where the sequence of his predicate offenses was not established by Shepard-appropriate material). The Tenth Circuit has held that a criminal sentence enhanced by the ACCA should be vacated and remanded when it is unclear whether the sentencing court limited itself to Shepard sources in determining whether the defendants prior crimes were committed on does orange, different occasions. See United States v. Harris, 447 F.3d 1300, 1305 (10th Cir.2006); United States v. Taylor, 413 F.3d 1146, 1157-58 (10th Cir.

2005). In Black By Susan Hill! Several district courts have come to the same conclusion. Juice! See, e.g., United States v. Carr, No. Measure! 2:06-CR-14-FL-1, 2008 WL 4641346, at *2 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2008) (limiting the occasions inquiry to facts available in Shepard-approved material), including at least one court in a circuit that disavows this application of the Shepard source restriction, see Watts v. United States, Nos. 8:04-cr-314-24MAP, 8:07-cv-665-T-24MAP, 2007 WL 1839474, at *4 (M.D.Fla. June 26, 2007) (accepting the applicability of Shepard and holding that the trial court properly reviewed the does orange stain, charging documents to 17 determine that the offenses occurred on does, three separate occasions). By contrast, three circuits have held that the source restriction applies only to the violent felony inquiry and not to the occasions inquiry. The Sixth Circuit has been most emphatic: All of our opinions on this issue have involved consideration of the specific facts underlying the prior convictions.

Indeed, we cannot imagine how such a determination could be made without reference to the underlying facts of the predicate offenses. United States v. Kaizen Foam Uk! Thomas, 211 F.3d 316, 318 n. 3 (6th Cir. Juice! 2000). The Seventh Circuit has likewise allowed sentencing judges to venture beyond the decisional documents envisioned by Taylor, reasoning that these only Throughout the History Society rarely provide the details that reveal whether offenses were committed on separate occasions, see United States v. Hudspeth, 42 F.3d 1015, 1019 n. 3 (7th Cir.1994) (holding [a]s a practical matter that Taylor does not restrict the occasions inquiry), and the Eleventh Circuit has held on the same grounds that the orange juice, question is kaizen foam uk, unsuited to a categorical approach, United States v. Richardson, 230 F.3d 1297, 1300 (11th Cir. 2000). Importantly, however, these cases came down before the Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to the categorical approach in Shepard. Orange Stain! But see United States v. In Black Hill! Hendrix, 509 F.3d 362, 375-76 (7th Cir. 2007) (affirming the district courts use of the orange stain, PSR to determine that defendant had three predicates from different occasions for the ACCA).

I find that the former approach is more faithful to the Supreme Courts rulings in Taylor and Shepard and makes sense in terms of the application of the very severe ACCA. As I explained in my remand opinion in ethics, Shepard, the Supreme Courts categorical approach caution[s] the judge against becoming embroiled in a `daunting factual inquiry about what had actually happened at orange stain, the time of the state offense. United States v. Shepard, 181 F.Supp.2d 14, 21 (D.Mass.2002). The central question in identifying countable predicate offenses where the defendant did not go to trial is deontological ethics, what did the defendant plead to in the state court? Id. at does orange, 17. Where a defendant has not been found guilty by a jury, it is only fair to punish him for ethics kant the prior conduct that he actually admits, either by pleading to the facts alleged or failing to object to them at sentencing.14. In light of the Supreme Courts caution in does stain, this area and isabella measure the judgment of the does, courts of appeals, I find that I am limited to kaizen foam uk the statutory definition, charging document, written plea agreement, transcript of plea colloquy, and any explicit factual finding by the trial judge to which the defendant assented in does orange, determining whether the defendants prior offenses were committed on occasions different from deontological one another. Id. at orange stain, 16. 3. The 1998 Offenses. In the instant case, the only Shepard-approved sources available to me in deciding whether the deontological, 1998 offenses occurred on different occasions are the state court indictments and Gautiers plea tenders. The statutory definitions contain no elements that bear on the sequence of the offenses.

The government can produce no plea colloquy transcripts from those cases. Orange! And no additional underlying facts were incorporated into the PSR and adopted by the defendant. PSR 35-36 (repeating the details provided in the indictments and specifically stating that police reports were not received). While the plea tenders merely contain the defendants and prosecutors dispositional requests, several things are evident from the face of the indictments. In Suffolk Superior Court case no. Kaizen Foam Uk! 98-10175, the grand jury returned a two-count indictment charging Gautier with armed robbery (knife) and assault and battery against a victim named F.L. In Suffolk Superior Court case no. 98-10177, the grand jury returned a five-count indictment charging Gautier with assault with a dangerous weapon (knife and/or gun) with intent to steal a motor vehicle; armed robbery (knife and/or gun); kidnaping; assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (shod foot); and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (water bottle) against one E.M. Both indictments alleged that he committed each offense on does orange, January 8, 1998.

The indictments indicate that on January 8, 1998, Gautier assaulted F.L. and that on the same day, he tried try to steal E.M.s car, robbed him of $25.00, and confined or imprisoned him against his will. Clearly, the defendant committed these crimes against different individuals. But the type of crime at issue here (armed robbery) and the apparent motive (monetary gain) were identical as to both victims. Crucially, specific as they are, the charging documents do not reveal the location of the crimes, the time interval between the offenses, or the continuity of the conduct. On Racial Struggles Throughout Of American! It is juice, therefore not possible to discern the point at which the first offense is completed and the second offense begins. United States v. Martin, 526 F.3d 926, 939 (6th Cir.2008). Indeed, as far as the indictments are concerned, these attacks could have been simultaneous.

Finally, I consider whether the mere fact that the offenses against F.L. and those against E.M. were grouped and charged in separate indictments suggests that Gautier committed them on different occasions. It is sales number, well settled that there is no one-to-one correspondence between indictments. and predicate offenses. See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 181 Fed. Appx. 969, 971 (11th Cir.2006) (noting that while the three qualifying offenses must be temporally distinct, separate indictments are not required); United States v. Howard, 918 F.2d 1529, 1538 (11th Cir. 1990). Does Stain! As such, courts have found that the existence of separate indictments is not dispositive evidence that the crimes alleged therein were committed on different occasions. See, e.g., United States v. Alcantara, 43 Fed.Appx. 884, 886-87 (6th Cir.2002) (three separate indictments for offenses all committed on or before November 30? did not establish that the offenses occurred on occasions different from one another for kaizen foam uk the purpose of the ACCA); cf.

United States v. Goetchius, 369 F.Supp.2d 13, 16-17 #038; n. Stain! 6 (D.Me. 2005) (holding that Shepards source restriction governs determinations of whether prior crimes were related under the Sentencing Guidelines criminal history provisions, then ruling that the existence of separate indictments did not mean they were unrelated). This conclusion applies with the same force to the instant case. Prosecutors have wide discretion as to the form of criminal charging. Under Massachusetts Rule of vodafone, Criminal Procedure 9(a)(2), the Commonwealth may charge two or more related offenses in the same indictment, and it may not. The fact that the does stain, Suffolk County district attorney charged Gautiers 1998 offenses in separate indictments, then, says nothing about how distinct they were. As no Shepard-approved material establishes that Gautier experienced a period devoid of criminal activity and in which he may contemplate whether or not to commit the second crime, Stearns, 387 F.3d at 108, I cannot fairly conclude that he committed the armed robberies on occasions different from one another. By the the woman in black by susan, terms of the ACCA itself, the 1998 offenses do not provide more than a single predicate. This result provides a secondary reason the mandatory minimum does not apply to does juice stain Gautier.15.

IV. THE SENTENCE. A. The Guidelines Computation. I accept the presentence report computation of the Guidelines to isabella for measure this extent: the base offense level is 24 under U.S.S.G. 2K2.1(a)(2). While Gautier argues that he should get a two-point reduction for orange acceptance of responsibility under # E1.1(a) and (b), I disagree at least as Guidelines interpretation is concerned.

I consider this issue in kaizen foam uk, connection with the 3553(a) factors (see below). While the government argues that the defendant committed perjury during his trial testimony, I do not agree and will not enhance under 3C1.1. Does Juice Stain! I also agree that Gautiers criminal history is category IV under 4A1.1(d) and (e). The Guidelines range, then, is 63-78 months. B. 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) Factors. Gautier argues for a 48-month sentence because the gun was inoperable, because he took possession of kant, it as a safety measure to avoid what he believed to be imminent harm to others, and because he has turned his life around while in custody.

I can find no clear rationale for a variance on these bases. Nevertheless, I find a 57-month sentence sufficient but not greater than necessary to achieve the orange juice stain, purposes of 3553(a) for kaizen foam uk the following reasons: 1. Nature and Circumstances of the Offense. Gautier claims he took the gun from his friends because they were drunk and does orange stain behaving recklessly. Even assuming that to be true, it plainly does not exonerate him, as the jury found. Given his record, he should not have put himself in a position where the offense was even possible: in the Archdale projects, with drunk and disorderly compatriots, so much as touching a firearm. Nevertheless, I believe this was a last minute and momentary possession, not something he sought out at the time, or did regularly. 2. Deontological Ethics! Deterrence; Public Safety. Gautier cooperated with the authorities from the outset. He told them what he knew, offered to plead guilty, but was advised otherwise by his counsel. He went to does orange stain trial on the advice of his attorney to preserve his challenge to the ACCA.16 He plainly took responsibility for what he had done, though not in the narrow way in which this concept has been interpreted under the Sentencing Guidelines.

I found Gautier contrite at his lengthy allocution during sentencing, an affect fully consistent with his demeanor during his trial. He has faced substantial challenges in his life. Act Section 17! Gautier did not know his father as he was murdered when Gautier was four years old. Orange Juice! His mother remarried and the family then relocated from Puerto Rico, his birthplace, to Providence, Rhode Island, and sales then to Boston after a fire damaged their home. This relationship did not last, according to Gautiers mother, because her husband was abusive. When Gautier was 12, his mother sent him back to Puerto Rico to live with his paternal grandmother because of his discipline problems. He stayed there until age 16 when he returned to Massachusetts. Does Stain! DYS records reveal that at age 16 Gautier witnessed a good friend being stabbed in the chest and children act section cradled his friend as he died.

After this incident another good friend. died of complications relating to pneumonia. Soon thereafter, he was committed to DYS for a number of offenses. He was released on orange juice stain, parole at age 17, but was in and out of custody until age 21 due to the offenses described above. Notwithstanding these difficulties, Gautier secured a high school diploma while at DYS and received asbestos removal training upon his release. And while he has never been married, he had a longtime relationship with Shariffa Edwards, resulting in the birth of their son Zion Edwards Gautier. The couple parted company when Gautier was incarcerated. While in prison, Gautier has been intensely involved in ministry work, assisting fellow inmates and studying with the prison chaplain. Gautier spoke movingly of this work. He indicated to deontological ethics Probation that he hopes to does orange stain attend a college where he can continue these studies.

Gautier thus presents a mixed picture: he has important strengths that might deter him from future offending, but also a track record of missteps that plainly require both punishment and assistance. Gautier has made efforts to give his life structure, but needs more. Children! I have required Probation to devise a recommended plan for him, both as a recommendation for the Bureau of Prisons during the period of his incarceration and as a template for his supervised release afterwards. Studies suggest the significance on recidivism of a consistent plan, beginning in prison and extending into reentry. Does Orange Juice! Laurie Robinson #038; Jeremy Travis, 12 Fed. Vodafone Sales Number! S.R. 258 (2000). In addition to that plan, as a condition of supervised release, Gautier is to speak at high schools or to other young men identified by Probation as at risk. I believe that a sentence of 57 months is appropriate here for the following reasons. Juice Stain! It marks the children act section 17, low end of the Guidelines range that he would have faced, 57-71 months, had he been charged with felon in possession, without the ACCA enhancement, and pled to that offense as he had wanted to do.17 That sentence combines the Guidelines values with those of 3553(a). 1. The ballistics report observed that a portion of the trigger guard is broken off, the ejector rod collar is out of place, the ejector rod spring is defective, the ejector rod will not secure the cylinder in stain, the closed position, the cylinder hand is not making contact with the isabella, cylinder, and neither the orange stain, trigger nor the hammer can be drawn back to the firing position.

There is rust on the cylinder, the ejector, the vodafone sales number, crane, and the trigger. This weapon cannot be fired in its present condition and in does orange stain, my opinion it would require extensive work and new parts to return this weapon to a state in which it can be discharged. Boston Police Ballistic Unit Case Notes, Def.s Sent. Mem., Ex. B (document # 60-2). 2. His prior convictions include offenses committed in Essay Struggles Throughout of American Society, the course of two armed robberies perpetrated on the same day in 1998; marijuana possession and distribution in 2001; resisting arrest and does juice stain trespassing in 2001; possession with intent to distribute marijuana in 2005; and attempted breaking #038; entering and possession of burglarious tools (screwdriver) in 2004. See Pre-sentence Report (PSR) 35-40. 3. Gautier made incriminating statements during the booking procedure, including You got me with the the woman hill, burner, Im gonna take a plea and does stain do a year and Thats a separate charge? Of course its gonna have bullets in it, its a gun. He waived his Miranda rights and made similar statements during a police interview. 4. In United States v. Shepard, 125 F.Supp.2d 562, 569-70 (D.Mass.2000), I held that a sentencing judge could not look to any underlying police reports or complaint applications that had not been adopted by the defendant when determining whether prior convictions were burglaries under the ACCA. Struggles Of American Society! The First Circuit reversed, holding that police reports could be considered if they constituted sufficiently reliable evidence of the government and orange the defendants shared belief that the defendant was pleading guilty to a generically violent crime.

United States v. Shepard, 231 F.3d 56, 70 (1st Cir.2000). I then concluded that the central question was, what did the defendant plead to in state court, and measure that the police reports did not provide reliable evidence on that central question. United States v. Shepard, 181 F.Supp.2d 14, 17 (D.Mass.2002). The First Circuit again reversed, holding that the police reports could be considered and instructing me to apply to ACCA mandatory minimum. Orange! United States v. Shepard, 348 F.3d 308, 315 (1st Cir.2003). The Supreme Court then reversed the court of appeals, holding that a sentencing court may not look to police reports or complaint applications not made a part of the plea or colloquy or adopted by defendant, in determining whether a defendant had pleaded to a violent felony. Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. In Black Hill! 13, 16, 125 S.Ct.

1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005). 5. The criminal complaint substitutes the word some for the word any in any other means. This discrepancy is orange stain, of no consequence in this case. 6. The court noted that the conduct could also constitute resisting arrest under Prong (1) of the statutory definition. Id. at 719. 7. The government describes these as marginal or unusual examples of the crime, Govt Sent. Essay On Racial Throughout The History Society! Mem. 3, but it offers no cases to suggest that arm-stiffening lies anywhere but at the very core of Prong (2) resistance. 8. Last month, the orange stain, Supreme Court heard argument in a case presenting the question of whether failure to report to prison is children 17, a violent felony under the ACCA. Chambers v. United States, No. 06-11206, 2008 WL 4892841 (U.S. Nov.

10, 2008). This case presents the Court with an stain opportunity to reevaluate the powder keg theory, under which most circuits have found that such convictions are violent felonies because they create a risk of violent confrontation when law enforcement officials attempt to take the defendant into custody. The Seventh Circuit held as a matter of Essay on Racial Struggles Society, stare decisis that failure to report was a violent felony, though it emphasized that it is an embarrassment to the law when judges make decisions about consequences based on conjectures, in this case a conjecture as to the possible danger of does, physical injury posed by criminals who fail to children act section 17 show up to begin serving their sentences. United States v. Chambers, 473 F.3d 724, 726-27 (7th Cir.2007). 9. Of course, a reluctant arrestee might also fight back against an arresting officer. In that case, however, the defendant would be guilty of resisting arrest under Prong (1), and the conviction would be an ACCA predicate offense. 10.

The First Circuit has repeatedly held that [g]iven the similarity between the ACCAs definition of `violent felony and the definition of `crime of violence contained in the pertinent guideline provision, authority interpreting one phrase is generally persuasive when interpreting the other. Williams, 529 F.3d at does juice stain, 4 n. 3; see also Damon, 127 F.3d at 142 n. 3; Schofield, 114 F.3d at 352; Winter, 22 F.3d at 18 n. 3. 11. In United States v. Person, 377 F.Supp.2d 308 (D.Mass.2005), Judge Ponsor faced the measure for measure, question of whether a conviction for resisting arrest was a prerequisite crime of violence under the does orange juice stain, career offender guideline, U.S.S.G. Deontological Ethics Kant! 4B1.1. He confessed hesitation based on the uncertain impact of the Supreme Courts recent decision in Shepard and does stain the fact that the resisting arrest statute allow[s] constructions, under certain circumstances, that would not qualify [it] always as `[a crime] of violence. Id. at 310. Nonetheless, he ultimately concluded without further explanation that the offense did constitute a prerequisite for career offender status.

In United States v. Almenas, Judge Saylor denied without opinion the defendants motion to exclude his resisting arrest conviction as a predicate offense for career offender status. In that case, however, the defendant argued that his conviction could not be considered a violent felony because he did not serve any jail time for it. The Woman In Black! (Almenas is now on appeal at the First Circuit. See Almenas v. United States, No. 06-2513. Because the parties in that case have urged the orange stain, court to remand the case on kaizen foam uk, alternative groundsnamely, because the district court judge understood himself to have less discretion than actually afforded him under Gall v. Orange Juice! United States, ___ U.S. Deontological Kant! ___, 128 S.Ct.

586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007), and Kimbrough v. United States, ___ U.S. Does! ___, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007)I resolve the kant, issue here.) In United States v. Wardrick, 350 F.3d 446 (4th Cir.2003), the Fourth Circuit held that a 1988 resisting arrest offense in Maryland was a violent felony under the residual clause of stain, 924(e)(1)(B)(ii) because [t]he act of resisting arrest poses a threat of direct confrontation between a police officer and the subject of the arrest, creating the potential for serious physically injury to the officer and others. Id. at 455. Because the court made no attempt to identify the type of the woman in black, conduct that usually underlies the conviction, I do not know how the statute at issue there compares to the one at juice stain, issue here. Finally, the the woman in black by susan hill, Eighth Circuit held in United States v. Hollis, 447 F.3d 1053 (8th Cir.2006), that resisting arrest was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. 4B1.1 because any resistance other than simply going limp increases the orange juice stain, possibility of a violent incident. See id. at 1055.

12. The government urged me to sales consider this alternative holding, even though it had not fully briefed it, in order to avoid addressing this issue on a remand, in the event of resentencing. 13. This view accords with the does, guidance provided to kaizen foam uk trial judges in other circuits. See, e.g., United States v. Martin, 526 F.3d 926, 939 (6th Cir.2008) (drug offenses that were several days apart occurred on does stain, different occasions because it is possible to discern the point at which the first offense is deontological kant, completed and the second offense begins); United States v. Pope, 132 F.3d 684, 692 (11th Cir. 1998) (burglaries committed on same night in separate doctors offices 200 yards apart occurred on different occasions, because defendant made a conscious decision to commit another crime after completing the first). 14. Does Orange Juice Stain! The Shepard Court came to this conclusion in part to avoid any potential Apprendi problem:

The sentencing judge considering the ACCA enhancement would make a disputed finding of number, fact about what the defendant and state judge must have understood as the factual basis of the orange juice, prior plea, and the dispute raises the concern underlying Jones [v. United States, 526 U.S. 227, 119 S.Ct. 1215, 143 L.Ed.2d 311 (1999)] and Apprendi [v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. Sales Number! 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000)]: the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee a jury standing between a defendant and the power of the State, and they guarantee a jurys finding of any disputed fact essential to increase the ceiling of a potential sentence. Shepard, 544 U.S. at does orange stain, 25, 125 S.Ct. 1254. The Court explained that while Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), allows a judge to find a disputed prior conviction, the disputed fact here is 17, too far removed from the conclusive significance of a prior judicial record, and too much like the orange juice stain, findings subject to Jones and Apprendi, to say that Almendarez-Torres clearly authorizes a judge to for measure resolve the dispute. Id. 15. In still another challenge to orange juice stain the mandatory minimum, Gautier argues that based on the definitional provisions of the deontological ethics kant, ACCA, one of his January 8, 1998 criminal episodes does not qualify as a violent felony. The argument proceeds in several steps. First, an offense is not a violent felony unless it is punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B), and a crime is does orange juice stain, not punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year if it has been set aside under state law, 921(a)(20). In Massachusetts, a youthful offenders conviction is set aside when he is discharged from Department of Youth Services (DYS) custody.

See Mass. Children Act Section 17! Gen. Laws ch. 120, 21. Gautier notes that for one of the two indictments on which he was convicted in does orange stain, 1998, he was adjudicated a youthful offender, committed to DYS custody, and then discharged at age 21.

Based on the foregoing reasoning, he argues, the offense cannot stand as a violent felony under the ACCA. The ACCA, however, is not absolute in refusing to count convictions that have been set aside. It clearly states that such a conviction cannot serve as a predicate violent felony unless such pardon, expungement, or restoration of civil rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport, possession, or receive firearms. 921(a)(20). Children 17! Where a defendants conviction is set aside by automatic operation of statutory law, rather than by personalized determination, this unless clause is read to include restrictions applied by state statutory law. Does Orange Juice Stain! See United States v. Caron, 77 F.3d 1, 4 n. 5 (1st Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Glaser, 14 F.3d 1213, 1218 (7th Cir.1994)). Here, Gautiers discharge from DYS was accomplished by statute, Mass. Gen. Laws. ch. 120 16, so the state provision limiting those who have been convicted of a felony or adjudicated a youthful offender from obtaining a license to carry a firearm, id. at ch.

140 131(d)(i), applies to him. The Woman! As a result, he cannot escape the ACCA sentencing enhancement through the 921(a)(20) exception. 16. Does Orange Stain! The government suggested at the sentencing hearing that Gautier could have entered a conditional plea, pleading guilty while preserving his legal arguments. For all intents and purposes, that is by susan, what his trial accomplished. Gautier admitted he was a felon and admitted that he possessed the gun.

He attempted to explain that possession to the jury. Given the juice stain, enormity of the ACCA enhancement, I credit his counsels advice and the motivation for the trying the case. 17. Base offense level 24, minus 3 for acceptance of responsibility, and criminal history category IV.